Someone recently told me about the 3 questions. I've been trying to apply it as much as possible, especially online. I'm happy to see this in the wild. Thanks!
I guess that's fair.
I kinda had the same feeling after reading it, I'm disappointed that I wasn't surprised, as in, I kind of figured the cops were all in these groups anyway but the confirmation doesn't give me the feel goods.
I think that they're talking about the wholesale rejection of all that is feminine. Especially growing up, any boy that demonstrated any kind of feminine traits or who was not "all boy" was ridiculed. That's what needs to change. Any weakness ridiculed, any sensitivity crushed... It's a wonder that there are any kind men at all.
Realistically speaking, there are some good ones. Practically speaking, if you aren't acting as if they're all bad, you're a fool.
Agreed on punitive justice though.
More crime? Great! Make more money for the cops (overtime) and the private prisons. Gotta keep OCP in business!
Yep. That's what I read. I don't like the idea of an app that examines other apps memory unless it's either the OS or antivirus.
This, I think, is a symptom of the failure to properly treat mental illness.
Nobody in their right mind does this.
Came here to say this; The state's actions show a disturbing pattern where they:
Refused to help Brittany Wise with $10,000 in housing debt when she proactively asked for assistance to keep her family together
Then spent at least $6,200 per month (likely much more given special needs) to separate her children and place them in foster care - far exceeding what it would have cost to simply help with housing
Made her children's situation actively worse by:
Choice of policy priorities is telling: The state dedicates less than 0.5% of its $450 million family preservation budget to housing assistance, despite housing being the third most common reason for separating families
The math alone exposes the reality - this isn't about costs or helping families. If it were, they would spend the smaller amount on housing assistance rather than the larger amount on foster care. The system seems designed to punish poverty by taking children from struggling parents rather than helping stabilize families in crisis.
When the state chooses to spend more money to break up a family than it would cost to keep them together, that reveals the true priority isn't the wellbeing of children or fiscal responsibility - it's exerting control and punishing parents for being poor.
I feel like this is probably pretty effective. I feel like it should be a thing.
E: see also https://beehaw.org/post/16953380 E2: https://19thnews.org/2024/11/4b-movement-south-korea-social-media-trump-presidency/
China accused the US of infiltrating Huawei Technologies Co. servers beginning in 2009, part of a broad-based effort to steal data that culminated in tens of thousands of cyber-attacks against Chinese targets last year.
The Tailored Access Operations unit of the National Security Agency carried out the attacks in 2009, which then continuously monitored the servers, China’s Ministry of State Security said in a post on its official WeChat account on Wednesday. It didn’t provide details of attacks since 2009.
Cyberattacks are a point of tension between Washington and Beijing, which has accused its political rival of orchestrating attacks against Chinese targets ever since Edward Snowden made explosive allegations about US spying. Washington and cybersecurity researchers have said the Asian country has sponsored attacks against the West.
The ministry’s accusations emerged as the two countries battle for technological supremacy. Huawei in particular has spurred alarm in Washington since the telecom leader unveiled a smartphone powered by an advanced chip it designed, which was made by Semiconductor Manufacturing International Corp. That’s in spite of years-long US sanctions intended to cut Huawei off from the American technology it needs to design sophisticated chips and phones.
Read more: US Probes Made-in-China Chip as Tensions Flare Over Technology
The US has been “over-stretching” the concept of national security with its clampdown on Chinese enterprises, Foreign Ministry spokeswoman Mao Ning told reporters at a regular press briefing in Beijing on Wednesday.
“What we want to tell the US is that suppression and containing of China will not stop China’s development. It will only make us more resolved in our development,” Mao said.
On Tuesday, US Commerce Secretary Gina Raimondo said she was “upset” when Huawei released the Mate 60 Pro during her visit to China last month, but noted the US has no evidence the Asian nation can make the advanced semiconductors powering the handset “at scale.”
This is so strange, it's almost as if having easily to obtain healthy food improves medical outcomes. Huh. /s