this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

204 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The goalpost for individuals is pushed further to make up for what corporations are doing, which is...(reads notes)...nothing.

[–] kilgore@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Came here to essentially say this. Our individual contributions are meaningless in the face of the abuses by corporations and wealthy individuals.

[–] lightstream@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you vote? Because it's the same principle - how one person votes might be irrelevant, but millions of people voting is powerful. This is true even though corporations have outsized influence on the political process.

Likewise, a single person deciding to not eat meat one day a week or replace one car journey with cycling is nothing in the global scheme of things, but a billion people all doing it will have more impact on the environment than any corporation ever could.

[–] kilgore@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I see your point, though I think the comparison isn't quite accurate. My one vote doesn't get canceled out many times over by the vote of a billionaire (though I suppose you could argue that lobbying by that billionaire could indeed cancel it out.

I guess I'm just growing pessimistic. For as much as I personally do, I feel its a drop in the water that is negated 1000 times over by corporations and wealthy individuals. I'm also tired of the narrative being focused on individual effort instead of pressuring corporations etc. to take more responsibility. But both individual and corporate/government action are needed, I suppose, if we're going to save ourselves...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] catarina@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but all the people taking multiple flights a year for weekend getaways aren't solely the responsibility of the "corporations", are they?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

That's not true. Corporations concede nothing until forced. And many countries are foceing corporations to do things.

For example, it's illegal in many countries for corporations to have short-distance flights where a train route is available.

We need more laws like this and corporations will do better.

[–] MxRemy@lemmy.one 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I gave up both, problem solved lol

[–] BedSharkPal@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] MxRemy@lemmy.one 5 points 1 year ago

You're extremely not wrong! 😅

[–] HotDogFingies@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

How about you redirect this question to the people actually responsible for setting the planet on fire and inevitably turning my children's futures to smoldering ash? I can only just barely afford to eat meat, certainly not every day, and any form of travel is a distant, impossible pipedream.

This is not my fault or responsibility. Life under capitalism hasn't afforded me that luxury. I do not get to make decisions, they are too expensive.

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

I've grown up under capitalism to and giving up meat was easy.

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

Both are necessary.

[–] argv_minus_one 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Why are we asking this question, and not asking where all the electrically powered planes and synthetic burgers are?

You don't advance as a civilization by throwing your hands in the air, giving up, and going back to the bad old days. You do it by finding a better way to do what you want to do.

[–] ondoyant 3 points 1 year ago (8 children)

many of the advancements to our civilization are directly powering our current apocalypse, and are leading to the collapse of ecosystems right now, not whenever we figure out how do things better.

i'm not a luddite, technology has made our lives easier in so many fucking ways, but right now we are catastrophically overburdening our planet with our consumption of resources, and we need to stop doing that also right now, and the very recent phenomenon of eating meat for every meal and moving through space faster than any human before the modern era ever traveled happen to both be luxuries we can live without, with disproportionate impacts on the viability of life on Earth.

we don't advance as a civilization by throwing our hands up in the air and going back to the bad old days, but we also don't advance as a civilization by being utterly unconcerned with the consequences of our actions. some technologies are fundamentally not worth the cost. especially industrial animal agriculture. if we can find better ways of doing things, sure, lets put them into action, but an attitude of unchecked growth will and currently is running up against the hard ceiling of the resources the Earth can produce, and every step we take over that energy budget makes life harder for everybody. unless you have your solution ready now, and you can be sure that whatever tech it is won't expand to consume as much energy as possible just like our current tech, slowing down and scaling back industries that contribute to ecological collapse and aren't necessary for human thriving is the solution.

load more comments (8 replies)
[–] MisterD@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago

Just make private jets illegal or tax the fk out of each trip

Ban bunker oil. It's used in shipping container boats. It's the most polluting fuel out there.

[–] P1r4nha@feddit.de 11 points 1 year ago

Haven't eaten meat for over 10 years. Other than having to manage my feelings of superiority nothing much has changed.

Change needs to be a lot more radical than reducing global CO2 by.. maybe 20%?

If we live plant-based we'll need a lot of less land. We'd need some serious land to free up this land for the wild and rebuild eco systems. And it would still not be enough, because the rising heat will just destroy it anyway.

So expensive sequestering technology at source needs to be made mandatory globally and everybody will feel the hit of that. Producing (and sequestering) CO2 will be so expensive that the market will find viable, cheaper alternatives.

[–] theodewere@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

man we need to start being a little more creative, and end all this binary thinking about everything.. THIS OR THAT: CHOOSE there has to be some hybrid solution here.. flying meat of some kind, i don't know, i'm not an architect of meat solutions.. but we have to find creative solutions, that ease transitions for economical reasons and shit.. maybe highly mobile buns..

[–] bandario@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The answer is the illustrious fifth meat...it's people.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] autumn 10 points 1 year ago

i gave up meat some 15+ years ago. easy peasy.

[–] PowerCrazy@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 year ago

Fortunately as an individual I don't have to give up either and it's pointless for me as well. As a member of society I will automatically adjust my habits to how we structure society. If society has decided to get rid of cars, then we are free to fly and eat meat while still massively decreasing total greenhouse gases to well below sustainable levels.

For some reason, petroleum industry sponsored "think pieces" like this that proliferate through green communities always structure the problem as an individual one. I wonder why they are always framed that way?

[–] NuPNuA@lemm.ee 9 points 1 year ago

Given I haven't eaten meat in 19 years, how many airmiles does that buy me?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 7 points 1 year ago

Givung up meat is 100 times easier.

Every market sells rice, beans, and veggies. But I'm still looking for that trans oceanic passenger ferry.

[–] MrsEaves@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Definitely meat - I’ve been vegetarian for a very long time and vegan since COVID, and no plans of stopping anytime soon! Flying is a bit more difficult, but I work from home and when my work requires me to travel, I’m lucky that I have the ability to take a train, so I do that. I do like traveling occasionally, and for some of the places I want to go, I can’t realistically avoid flying.

If anyone here is interested in giving up or reducing meat intake but needs a little advice or extra support to get started, please let me know. I’m happy to share any knowledge and tips I can!

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] LibertyLizard@slrpnk.net 6 points 1 year ago

Meat for sure. Giving up flying means giving up seeing my family. Probably one of the last things I would sacrifice, personally.

[–] RickyRigatoni@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

I haven't had a reason to fly since 2004, and I last ate meat 3 hours ago. I think my answer is obvious.

[–] noqturn@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Meat. I live on the other side of the country from my family, and the only way I can have enough time to visit them is by some form of high speed transit. Since there’s no high speed train in the US, I’m stuck flying.

[–] HorrorSpirit@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Flying. I already hate it because of sensory issues and the general stress it causes me, helping the environment is a bonus. Sadly i live in the US, so i need to take flights to get anywhere vaguely far away, even within my own damned country.

Of course if we are talking the environment then the only things that can be done to have any actual impact will reduce the profits of corporations and as such will not happen.

[–] buwho@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago

Definitely meat. I'm omnivorous now, but have been vegan for years and vegetarian years before that. Its actually ideal if you can afford it/ find the right dumpsters.

I have not found an efficient and fast way to travel across the ocean as i am not an experienced large vessel sailor and/or do not have access to a deep ocean worthy vessel.

[–] Vaggumon@midwest.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Flying, I haven't been on a plane in 25 years, and I have no plans to ever get on one again. But I love a good steak.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't know how long it has been, but I haven't had a compelling reason to fly since before 9/11/2001. I guess that's about 25 years.

[–] WimpyWoodchuck@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

For me, both price and time are very compelling reasons to fly, unfortunately.

The state of the environment is an even more compelling reason for me not to. But for many people it's not. That's why the price of flying must be raised enough, and alternatives like traveling by train must be made more attractive. So that there is enough reason not to fly for everyone.

[–] dingus@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

High speed trains exist, just not in places like the USA. We could have more environmentally friendly coupled with similar time convenience. It's truly unfortunate that it's never been invested in, because its a viable and much less damaging alternative.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Send_me_nude_girls@feddit.de 4 points 1 year ago

Since I fly only like once every 20 years, I say neither.

[–] RealAccountNameHere 4 points 1 year ago

If forced to choose, I'd give up flying. As I'm scared of it anyway, that makes the most sense. :)

That said, I think that if we all just did less of those things, it would be good too. Take more vacations near home. Eat meat only a few times a week. That sort of thing.

[–] nbailey@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

If I got 3x the vacation time from work to let me travel by oceanliner or airship I’d happily stop flying — but that would never happen. So instead we just have to use discretion for both. Eat more mushrooms & beans; take trips closer to home by rail. And yes once in a while enjoy a nice steak or take a trip overseas. Moderation is key.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Nemo@midwest.social 4 points 1 year ago

I'd do both and gladly. I've already reduced both significantly below average.

[–] Zozano@aussie.zone 3 points 1 year ago

Been vegan for 3 years now. I lost my superpowers once when a restaurant gave me cheese when I asked for none. I wasn't going to waste food.

Flying sucks ass. So, I'll give up both?

[–] dylanmorgan@slrpnk.net 3 points 1 year ago

I gave up flying a while ago, so I guess I’ll keep that up.

[–] reclipse@lemdro.id 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is it even possible to give up flying?

[–] Nemo@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago (7 children)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 3 points 1 year ago

Flying. I don’t like that shit anyway.

[–] PurliWhite 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

i’ve been trying to have less meals with meat. we had delicious butternut squash curry that was flavorful and filling over rice, and i was super proud of it.

then my husband made chicken to put in all the leftovers… 🤦🏻‍♀️

can’t people just fly less private jets please?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 2 points 1 year ago

I think I'd schedule a movie night for Earthlings every time he did some asshole move like that

[–] eleefece@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

If Taylor Swift stops flying how many of us does it count for?

[–] BurriedCondor@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

Could I give up meat for year if I plan on going on vacation that year and eat meat on non travel years?

load more comments
view more: next ›