this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
61 points (100.0% liked)

Green - An environmentalist community

204 readers
1 users here now

This is the place to discuss environmentalism, preservation, direct action and anything related to it!


RULES:

1- Remember the human

2- Link posts should come from a reputable source

3- All opinions are allowed but discussion must be in good faith


Related communities:


Unofficial Chat rooms:

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] AnonTwo@kbin.social 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

The goalpost for individuals is pushed further to make up for what corporations are doing, which is...(reads notes)...nothing.

[–] kilgore@feddit.de 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Came here to essentially say this. Our individual contributions are meaningless in the face of the abuses by corporations and wealthy individuals.

[–] lightstream@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Do you vote? Because it's the same principle - how one person votes might be irrelevant, but millions of people voting is powerful. This is true even though corporations have outsized influence on the political process.

Likewise, a single person deciding to not eat meat one day a week or replace one car journey with cycling is nothing in the global scheme of things, but a billion people all doing it will have more impact on the environment than any corporation ever could.

[–] kilgore@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I see your point, though I think the comparison isn't quite accurate. My one vote doesn't get canceled out many times over by the vote of a billionaire (though I suppose you could argue that lobbying by that billionaire could indeed cancel it out.

I guess I'm just growing pessimistic. For as much as I personally do, I feel its a drop in the water that is negated 1000 times over by corporations and wealthy individuals. I'm also tired of the narrative being focused on individual effort instead of pressuring corporations etc. to take more responsibility. But both individual and corporate/government action are needed, I suppose, if we're going to save ourselves...

[–] TheBurlapBandit 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That billionaire doing the right thing is going to force the same lifestyle changes anyway. Meat tycoon shuts down operations. Now no meat is available for purchase- vegan is the only option. Coal plants shut down. Blackout hours are enforced while battery infrastructure catches up. Auto makers shut down operations. Public transit is clogged until capacity increases, more people start biking. Airlines drastically cut available flights. No long distance travel for you until high speed rail can be built. Shipping magnates vessels are decommissioned. Many goods are either more expensive or entirely unavailable.

[–] kilgore@feddit.de 2 points 1 year ago

I agree! And I think that's the only way we'll actually get a critical mass of people to change their ways.

[–] catarina@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, but all the people taking multiple flights a year for weekend getaways aren't solely the responsibility of the "corporations", are they?

[–] itchy_lizard@feddit.it 3 points 1 year ago

That's not true. Corporations concede nothing until forced. And many countries are foceing corporations to do things.

For example, it's illegal in many countries for corporations to have short-distance flights where a train route is available.

We need more laws like this and corporations will do better.