Gaywallet

joined 2 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Gaywallet 4 points 22 hours ago* (last edited 21 hours ago) (1 children)

It's a big step up from literally drowning lab rats as an experiment, but we've got a long way to go before we get even reasonably ethical with lab animals 😔

To be fair if anyone was gonna not kill them when they're done, this lab seems like they might be the ones.

[–] Gaywallet 3 points 1 day ago
[–] Gaywallet 3 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) (1 children)

compress the image first, there's a max upload size and I think a max pixel size (I forget)

[–] Gaywallet 4 points 3 days ago (1 children)

Yes, but if a review board were to sign off on them and then someone managed to significantly hurt or damage themselves, one could theoretically apply some of the blame to the review board for not doing their job to ensure that a study was safe. The whole idea of having ethics as a part of the review board was born of some of the studies they used to sign off on that were ultimately problematic and resulted in seriously damaging some individuals, such as minorities and kids.

[–] Gaywallet 12 points 3 days ago

Been really disappointed in my states recent measure track record. NIMBYism is currently winning and we're headed back towards a tough on crime approach that never worked. It's really sad to see

[–] Gaywallet 6 points 3 days ago

Sorry by experimental what I meant here is something which is not ready to be tested in humans - this scientist was skipping a bunch of the necessary steps to show this is a safe thing to do (in lab grown cells first, for example) to proceed to human experimentation.

[–] Gaywallet 17 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) (6 children)

Ethically speaking, we should not be experimenting on humans, even with their explicit consent. It's not allowed by any credible review board (such as the IRB) and in many countries you can be held legally liable for doing experiments on humans.

With that being said, there have been exceptions to this, in that in some countries we allow unproven treatments to be given to terminal patients (patients who are going to die from a condition). We also generally don't have repercussions for folks who experiment on themselves because they are perhaps the only people capable of truly weighing the pros and cons, of not being mislead by figures of authority (although I do think there is merit of discussing this with regards to being influenced by peers), and they are the only ones for which consent cannot be misconstrued.

[–] Gaywallet 8 points 1 week ago

Bbhh hope you've been well friend 💜

[–] Gaywallet 8 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Would love to see you start posts and discussions about what next! I've personally been really energized by all the activity I've been seeing in activism, queer, and anarchist groups since the election results were clear.

[–] Gaywallet 41 points 1 week ago

Absolutely. If someone is being openly fash, please report them so we can remove them.

But I've seen a lot of really heated infighting where people were treating others in bad faith. Let's not do that.

 

We know tensions are high. Many of us are feeling upset and disappointed. Some are feeling helpless, overwhelmed, anxious, a deep sense of dread, and other very strong feelings. You have every right to experience those feelings and those feelings are extremely valid.

However, those feelings can often blind you - they can tint your world in a color which shapes how you are interpreting the words of others. They might stop you from picking up on key words someone else is using which signal their agreement with you or they might make you interpret neutral words as a signal of disagreement. These emotions can also push you to say things which might be more confrontational than usual or they might make you more emotionally vulnerable or volatile. These are all natural and normal parts of being a human and being emotional.

But we are operating in a space with others and we need to remember to center the humanity of everyone present. If you're finding yourself unable to give people the benefit of the doubt or to treat them with good faith and to provide space and questions placed in good faith to understand what they are saying without letting your biases creep in, it might be time for you to take some space away from a charged environment like politics. I've seen some nasty behavior in the last 24 hours. As a team, we've tried our best to clean up some of the worst of it, but I also know I've given a bit more leeway to some infighting than I normally would because I know emotions are high. But I'm reminding you all that you are better than this. I'm asking you all to help keep this a nice space and we can only do if we do it together.

[–] Gaywallet 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Removing this comment for your final sentence. You're welcome to be upset and air your frustrations. You are not welcome to be sexist while doing so. You're better than this.

[–] Gaywallet 1 points 1 week ago

My dude, I told you to chill and take a step back. People were reporting you for being confrontational. I flagged my comment to help you understand that this was me helping you understand how we do things on Beehaw. If you think someone reminding you of the rules, asking you to take a step back, asking you to not be confrontational and doing their best to treat your comment with good faith and providing you educational material is "rude and condescending" or that it is "talking down to others" then you're probably not a good fit for this instance.

I'm going to time you out from our instance for 7 days. Please take that time to reflect. If you repeatedly show this behavior on our instance, you may find yourself with longer timeouts or even being removed.

9
What "misinformation" is usually about (mikecaulfield.substack.com)
submitted 1 month ago by Gaywallet to c/politics
view more: next ›