Gaywallet

joined 3 years ago
MODERATOR OF
[–] Gaywallet 14 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

wholesome content, thank you for sharing

[–] Gaywallet 3 points 5 days ago

To me it seems the original comment was simply someone providing an example of how binary trans folks can be upset at being referred to as they/them, an experience that many have also shared in here. Those who have chimed in have even stated it is mostly a pet peeve or an annoyance at best. I'm not sure I share your opinion that anyone was getting their "panties in a twist" so much as they were educating and sharing, which is completely reasonable on a website of this size in an area where folks who are not queer can read and comment.

Your response makes plenty of sense given the severity of problems happening right now. I wonder, however, if your energy is not better spent elsewhere? Infighting does not serve anyone, something which I see even you preaching, yet you are even replying to my comment where I simply am reminding you to be nice (which I made as an admin only because you were reported) with strong language deriding your fellow queers and allies.

[–] Gaywallet 7 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I do not think it's particularly nice to escalate and get mad at someone who is trying gently to educate you.

This comment was reported, please remember our only rule on this website and try to be nice in the future.

[–] Gaywallet 10 points 2 weeks ago (1 children)

There's a lot of generalizations going on here. I'm going to leave space for you to vent, but please keep in mind we have one rule on this instance and it is to be(e) nice.

[–] Gaywallet 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

In complete agreement here, but also I understand the need for folks to be able to vent about a fucked up situation 😔

[–] Gaywallet 5 points 1 month ago

On the good side of things: It literally changed my life. I had no idea how poorly I had been sleeping, and once I did have some healing, and started getting good, consistent sleep, many of the things I struggled with just suddenly disappeared. I didn’t have the rapid mood swings. I didn’t struggle with anger. I could think more clearly, and focus on tasks. Life was truly a fundamentally different experience for me.

Interesting, thank you for sharing this.

[–] Gaywallet 6 points 1 month ago

Woah, okay yea I get sick a fair deal but now I'm wondering how much has to do with the tonsils

[–] Gaywallet 4 points 1 month ago

The 3D medium had some fantastic art. There were a lot of gimmicks in movies you'd expect, like harold and kumar go to whitecastle (not meant to be a serious movie). But there were also fantastic shots and art direction such as in tron: legacy and prometheus, where 3D provided a much deeper feel of space and made certain shots that much more emotionally resonant and beautiful.

There were a lot more misses than wins, as most directors saw it as a gimmick, but not everyone did. The folks who thought carefully about how extra dimensions would affect a shot (even when it was done in post rather than shot on 3D cameras) made some wonderful art, and it's a shame so many folks missed out on it because they weren't able to see past it as a gimmick either.

 

I'm currently sick with strep! 4th time in a year, doc said maybe it's time to get the tonsils out. I'm not sure I'm sold on the idea - outside of the last 2ish years I feel like I don't get strep all that often. Anyone else have their tonsils out as an adult? What was your experience?

[–] Gaywallet 2 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The quantity of disinformation is irrelevant if people don’t fall for it

I don't know about you, but I find it increasingly difficult to find unbiased takes and find myself spending more time digging than I previously did. Because of this I find myself increasingly mislead about things, because the real truth might be so obscured that I need to find an actual academic to parse what information is out there and separate primary source from other mislead individuals.

Not to say I don't disagree with your point, I think you make a fair one, but I do believe that the quantity of disinformation is absolutely relevant, especially in an age where not only anyone can share their misinformed belief online, but one where this is increasingly happening by malicious actors as well as AI.

[–] Gaywallet 2 points 1 month ago

Just dropping by here to remind you to treat others on this instance in good faith, even when you disagree.

[–] Gaywallet 3 points 1 month ago

This has been reported on account of the source. I'm not sure it's worth removing necessarily, and would direct people to look at @spit_evil_olive_tips@beehaw.org comment for another source and an excellent summary.

[–] Gaywallet 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Don't get me wrong, it's not a way to solve everything. But an authoritative body can build credibility and hold onto it. People should still be skeptical and still review, but that's a normal part of the scientific process. Knowing what's more and less credible is a normal process of research, and learning to assess credibility is important too. Peer review doesn't need to be torn down as a concept, it just needs to be taken with a healthy grain of salt, like all processes. This is part of why I mentioned how some journals are more reputable than others - it's a reflection of how often their peer review misses important things, not a reflection of how bullet-proof their science is. Everyone makes mistakes, the goal should always be to make less.

Also, to be clear, I'm talking about the post-research and pre-publish step, not the pre-research proposal step - that form of peer review can fuck right off.

Also of great importance which I should have probably highlighted in my initial post - this is really dependent on the field itself. In medicine people put in effort for that kind of review. I've peer reviewed quite a few papers and I've received really good advice from peer reviewers on some of the papers I'm on. Certainly this can happen in environments where this kind of review isn't necessary, but the institutions that exist do make it a lot easier. An open source self-hosted model would make it really hard to get an idea of how many eyes were on a particular paper, and would make keeping up with continuing education difficult.... of course unless groups of people made their career reviewing everything that emerges and putting together summaries or otherwise helping to sift through the noise.

37
submitted 2 months ago by Gaywallet to c/science
view more: next ›