this post was submitted on 29 Jun 2023
39 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30567 readers
13 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Ubisoft has announced its first ever Web3 game, Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles, which will launch on the Oasys blockchain.

Oasys is a blockchain which was established in February 2022 and is backed by multiple companies, including Bandai Namco, Sega, Ubisoft, and Square Enix. It is marketed as a specialist blockchain for games.

Ubisoft describes Champions Tactics: Grimoria Chronicles is a "PvP tactical RPG experimental game" and is currently in development for PC. You can take a look at a trailer below: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sKPixIolnYw

Ubisoft hasn't fared well in its previous attempts with blockchain. Its NFT plaform Quartz was criticised by French trade union Solidaires Informatique, which represented Ubisoft Paris employees. Following this, those in charge at Ubisoft said players "don't get it", whilst giving away special Ghost Recon Breakpoint NFTs to the game's developers to thank them for their efforts, rather than monetary compensation.

In September, Ubisoft CEO Yves told Eurogamer the company was continuing to look at "all the Web3 capabilities", despite a lack of success with Ubisoft Quartz and internal pushback from staff.

Other gaming companies which are validators for Oasys have also been involved with NFTs, blockchain, or Web3 previously. Square Enix announced Symbiogenesis, which it touted as a "unique experience" in a "virtual (turn-based) adventure", earlier this year. The company also sold Final Fantasy 7 NFTs as part of the game's 25th anniversary celebrations.

At the beginning of 2022, it was also revealed that Sega had filed trademarks for two projects called Sega Classics NFT Collection and Sega NFT. Sega CEO Haruki Satomi said the company "would like to try out various experiments" with regards to NFTs and play-to-earn, though it would be guided by "what will be accepted and what will not be by the users".

top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Ranessin 37 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Welcome to 2020's fad Ubisoft. Nowadays we hype AI parsers and generators if we want VC money.

[–] Erk@cdda.social 22 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I have no idea what blockchain possibly adds to game development except an out of date buzzword.

[–] MoiraPrime@lib.lgbt 3 points 1 year ago

Basically just NFTs and speculation. They love it because they can program the NFTs to give them a cut of the payment every time it's bought/sold, on TOP of the initial purchase.

They want everything to be a microtransaction, and everything to require money in order to participate in even the most basic of things.

[–] OmegaMouse@feddit.uk 17 points 1 year ago (2 children)

What exactly does it mean for a game to 'launch on the Blockchain'? Is that a fancy way of saying that weapons/clothing in-game will be NFTs?

[–] gk99@kbin.social 18 points 1 year ago (3 children)

In essence, yes. These blockchain games exist for two reasons:

  1. They want "play to earn" gameplay where people are grinding to get items of real value to sell, like a job.
  2. They want it on everything, not just Steam where the community market already exists.

Problem is nobody likes or wants NFTs.

[–] Goronmon@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

Problem is nobody likes or wants NFTs.

That's not true. /r/superstonk is definitely on board. As is anyone hoping to pump and dump NFT markets.

Outside of that though, yeah, no one really wants NFTs.

[–] brsrklf@compuverse.uk 2 points 1 year ago

"play to earn"

Since the NFT craze happened, this has been my new most hated video game-related "concept".

Impressive given the manipulative crap we got.

[–] HKayn@dormi.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Man I miss the times when we weren't expected to treat games like full-time jobs.

[–] ComMcNeil@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I was just thinking about that, what exactly is the added benefit of a blockchain game?
I can only imagine it being about drops being NFTs. However even then I do not see any tangible benefit for the players, I mean trading items can be done without NFTs as well.

[–] t3rmit3 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only. single. sole. use I can think of would be if you had distributed, self-hosted multiplayer servers, and wanted a way to keep/port your items across them.

So if your friend A is running a gameserver, and you find a super rare item, if it can be verified as attached to your account you could go to friend B's server and have it be trusted that you do in fact have that item.

The thing is, this doesn't actually happen. No one is building distributed video games like that, least of all the companies who are actually using this crap.

[–] vanquesse@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I don't think most people consider the support nightmare having ingame assets live on a blockchain will bring. Not to mention the drama if a popular, rare and expensive type of item gets nerfed.

[–] Steinsprut@szmer.info 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Sounds like an exec read about web3 somewhere and decided they want a web3 game now

[–] Thalestr 4 points 1 year ago

Yup, this is basically "Shareholders told us to do it: The Game"

[–] brezelradar@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

Worked well for reddit, didn't it? ... oh, wait...

[–] Sneptaur@pawb.social 12 points 1 year ago

I’m sure people will flock to this and start playing it immediately. /s

[–] ICastFist@programming.dev 8 points 1 year ago

Wow, they really didn't learn shit from the whole fiasco with that Ghost Recon NFT

[–] king_dead 3 points 1 year ago

Just what the video game space needed, more Decentralands

load more comments
view more: next ›