I hate to link to Reddit (and I'm too old to know how to get to the original video), but this also seems pretty relevant: https://www.reddit.com/r/TikTokCringe/comments/1i302rf/if_tiktok_being_banned_doesnt_radicalize_you_as/
t3rmit3
In the beginning, sure. But all the TikTok users actively choosing Chinese alternatives would seem to disagree with that, now.
You’re argument is basically that you should have the right to to ruin yourself.
Look, I agree with you that TikTok is bad, but... YES, freedom means the ability to choose, good or bad.
If you want someone to blame for this, blame the US government for allowing US tech companies to become so predatory and gross that young people literally prefer a foreign product that may be profiling them. It's not like data collection and censorship isn't rife on Xitter or FB, and the reality for most Americans is that the US government has more ability to use their data to directly harm them than the CCP does. No one is worried that the Chinese government is going to show up in Alabama with CPS in tow because a teen revealed they're trans online.
It’s also worth stressing that German states are still far less powerful and less independent than American states (there’s no equivalent to the national guard, for example, and legislative powers are also far more limited beyond education) despite being literally conceived to prevent a Fascist government from taking over.
The National Guard is a major threat to US stability right now, because it has no legal hurdles to overcome in being deployed internally, and the Federal government can call up any state's units for federal use, even overriding the state governors. Trump has already floated using NG units to assist ICE in deportations in Blue states.
This is also not hypothetical. In 2020 Trump used Natl. guard troops against the wishes of the DC city government, from another state, for policing actions, which is supposed to violate the Posse Commitatus Act, but did an end-run around this by saying they weren't really federalized. Legal scholars have been objecting ever since, but that's the precedent now. The author tries to pretend otherwise by rationalizing DC as an unusual edge cases, but the DC government specifically opposed the NG deployment, and was ignored, and now the president is legally immune for any "presidential acts" for term 2.
tl;dr the National Guard has created a legal gray area where the President can order troops into unwilling states, including for policing actions that were supposed to be explicitly prohibited, and maybe not violate the Constitution. Since it's not 100% clear-cut, no Blue state is going to risk deploying their NG forces or LEOs against them, since it could (literally) be ruled as treason, especially with our SCOTUS.
I don't know German law around deploying the military internally, but from a cursory glance online it appears to require parliamentary approval and be highly restricted in it's activities, and never seems to allow for simple policing actions. US Natl. Guard bypasses congress entirely in its current incarnation, and appears unlikely to be restricted by the courts.
That's a feature, but sadly many don't realize that
Zuckerberg is just cynically following the political winds to avoid Trump going after Meta at Elmo's behest. He doesn't care any way about anything other than getting and keeping (not) his money. The second Democrats control all 3 branches, if that ever happens again, he'll make another 180. Don't give him the credit of saying these are his true, "mask off" morals or beliefs; he has no morals or beliefs.
Starting into the article, I got the impression that it was heading for a "centralization ultimately better" argument, so I'm glad it concludes on decentralization and federation's advantages.
There are no issues that exist on federated and distributed channels as individual nodes that don't also exist on centralized ones, differences only emerge when you try to treat or exercise control over distributed systems as a group. Facebook is completely centralized, but they still have to deal with third party content making its way onto their platform via bots, API posts, integrations, ads, etc. The big difference is that with a centralized platform, you have a Single Point of Failure, and that's bad all-around.
There is literally no advantage to a centralized platform that I can think of (though I'm sure that people less opposed to authority/ hierarchy would disagree).
Wasn't part of the point that the mindset necessary to create Iron Man would inevitably lead to Ultron?
Automation to increase power (productivity) beyond what humans alone could do -> Iron Man -> Cutting out humans once they are the chokepoint/ limiter in power (productivity) -> Ultron
Companies want automation because they don't want human limits on productivity to restrict their profits. That mindset is the problem. If we accept that mindset as a valid business operating model, it will never not lead to wanting to remove humans as much as possible.
Turns out the Luddites were right, and the company-owned factory automation was a scheme to dilute worker pay and value. That we're now fighting not to have workers cut out of the equation entirely kind of proves that it was in fact a slope we've slipped down.
9 hours a day, 9 days a week, 6 years a year
I love TypeMoon's series, especially Fate and Kara no Kyoukai! I'm not sure if there's enough specific interest to need a dedicated community, though. It can be difficult to introduce people to TypeMoon stuff, in my experience, if they're not already into anime in general (or if they've already started to 'grow out' of a lot of it).
The person quoted in the OP who said
I’m probably being too hopeful
The fact that Congress could come together so rapidly and so unanimously to do something so stupid, at a time when our country is falling apart, says so much about their priorities. They work for the Capitalist class, not us.