this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
169 points (100.0% liked)

196

667 readers
38 users here now

Be sure to follow the rule before you head out.

Rule: You must post before you leave.

^other^ ^rules^

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
169
Rule (lemmy.blahaj.zone)
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by ShaggyDemiurge@lemmy.blahaj.zone to c/196@lemmy.blahaj.zone
 

Btw, bigotry does not need to be conscious or intentional or malicious to be real and cause harm, and you can be transphobic even when you're not trying to or believe you're are not

top 28 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] ShaggyDemiurge@lemmy.blahaj.zone 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Btw, bigotry does not need to be conscious or intentional or malicious to be real and cause harm, and you can be transphobic even when you’re not trying to or believe you’re are not, just saying.

[–] DigitalAudio@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

This is why educating people on what being trans actually is and dispelling a lot of harmful and ill-intentioned myths is key in combating transphobia.

People always say that there's no point in talking to bigots and that they won't listen to reason. But I actually think there will always be merits to open and honest discussion if bigotry comes from a place of ignorance and not of malice. And since we can't know that for sure, open and honest discussions will always have at least some merit to them in my opinion.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Education is always the go-to way to combat these ideas. But of course, there will always be some people that will remain voluntarily ignorant. (And the other side, also wants to use it for the other way around.)

As said in another comment, I am cis and know nobody that isn't. This of course leaves me with little outside of the wild west of the internet. For this I ask you, do you have any resource (books, documentaries, videos...) that can help me understand the concept better so I can be a better supporter?

[–] PeterBronez@hachyderm.io 3 points 1 year ago

@SSUPII @DigitalAudio the most useful resource I’ve come across is this Philosophy Tube video: https://youtu.be/AITRzvm0Xtg

[–] Track_Shovel@slrpnk.net 4 points 1 year ago

Seriously this.

I'm not a deliberate shitlord, and actively work on making people of all walks of life and ages welcome in my presence. That said, the trans movement is relatively new, and I'm still learning, despite living under a rock

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 19 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

That one thread of the dude saying he isn't attracted to post-op trans men because he likes tits and the comment section that is just "trans people are too sensitive". If you don't wanna date trans people it's fine. But being like "oh nooo, your boobs are gonna go away" is a joke

[–] Vlaxtocia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

Oh gross, I didn't go super deep into the comment section but that is awful

[–] unmarketableplushie@pawb.social 19 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Oh, you saw that comment section too, huh?

Yeah it fucking sucks. I hope that it won't become the norm for Lemmy's 196.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Responding to you here because fuck that thread so much. I have no idea how someone can essentially say "Yeah I'd date a trans man if they didn't have a masculine body" and see no issues with it. Fine with dating someone pre-transition because they're who you want them to be and not who they want to be? It's insane what "allies" say.

They really need to take a long hard look in the mirror.

[–] conneru64@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 1 year ago

I'm pretty sure that commenter cited that reason as why it would be a bad idea.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Lemmy's 196 has been way more liberal than Reddit 196, and I'm really not a fan of it. Some of these comment sections are full of the "Not all men!" Crowd and it's annoying AF.

[–] ohkoifishy@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Bsck when i used reddit i was told on 196 that I was being misogynistic when I, a trans man, talked about how I was receiving death threats irl after the Nashville shooting.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

196 has always had its disappointing moments, I'm really sorry you had to go through that though. The amount of transphobia that case brought out of people was really hard to live with out in the Midwest.

[–] Sekoia@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago

I think it's because 196 here is "bigger" in relative terms, so it shows up more in c/all, so you get more people from other places getting exposed.

[–] unmarketableplushie@pawb.social 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Why do non-queer people have to ruin everything? :(

[–] unmarketableplushie@pawb.social 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ironically, the moderator who keeps insisting that it wasn't transphobic is actually trans.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

I'm not surprised. I mean after seeing him clarify what he meant to say, I don't really think it's the end of the world. Even without that though, I wouldn't care about the comment if it wasn't posted by a mod afterwards. The thread that followed has so much fully transphobic shit in it and I find it disappointing that a mod would create the space for that.

196 was never the shining beacon of trans-understanding but migration seems to have made it messier.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It really depends on context.

If it really wasn't intentional, is it fault of the person speaking? Or is more of an issue of the environment it is living in?

[–] ShaggyDemiurge@lemmy.blahaj.zone 23 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Transphobia is transphobia. Malicious transphobia is obviously worse, but unintentional one, created by biases that person internalized by living in transphobic society, is still transphobia. Doesn't make you a bad person automatically, but being called out should act as an encouragement to reflect on these biases, not double down and go "I'm actually not transphobic, and it's you ~~trann~~ trans people who are too sensitive"

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 7 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Absolutely, but the call out or response must be done appropriately without putting the other person in the defensive. This is true for any type of discussion.

I am cis an not know anyone that isn't. This means that everything I know about the community is via internet or television, and you know that can escalate, how information can start conflicting or just downright provide false dangerous information.

Writing this response, I actually found out I have a sensitivity bias due to all those Twitter posts screenshots about people getting very mad at others for something written. This is not good, because I do always think about what I write online but in this argument I am thinking more than I do usually. Thanks for making me notice it, I don't want this. I probably just need to talk more about this topic.

[–] Nalivai@discuss.tchncs.de 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

That's the thing, you recognize that it's not nice being addressed the way you don't want to. You don't want to be called out the way you don't want to, use this feeling to understand how it's not nice to be referred to in transphobic manner.

[–] SSUPII@sopuli.xyz 2 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Of course, I do not put a single gram of doubt into that.

I wanted to come out with something I noticed I did wrong, despite me not having to because I want to always get to a better version of myself and it being on topic.

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 year ago

Yeah, some of the best allies I've ever had also had their unintentionally transphobic moments. When I first came out, there was an old woman I worked with who referred to me as "The queer". She'd also ask if I needed to go to the restroom anytime she went because she knew I was terrified to go in the women's bathroom alone. She'd chew people out on my behalf for being even slightly disrespectful. Even if I had the courage to do it (I didn't) I wouldn't have been able to advocate for myself like I needed to because I'm a trans woman. It's like how sometimes you gotta find a man to say something to another man so that they'll actually listen.

I spoke to her about it, she said she understood the discomfort and she'd just been using it as a term for so long that she didn't see it as an insult. She never stopped calling me that although the frequency did go down. She never said "Well I do all this for you as a friend, why are you even mentioning this?". She saw that she was unintentionally making her friend uncomfortable and wanted to do better. She still slipped up sometimes afterwards, and that was perfectly fine with me.

That's the difference between an ally that isn't perfect and someone who uses allyship to boost their ego

[–] funbreaker@kbin.run 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Kinda fucked up that that‘s being tolerated on blåhaj zone of all places

[–] LeylaaLovee@lemmy.blahaj.zone 12 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Not just tolerated, a mod straight up posted a report and said stop reporting it because it wasn't transphobic. Explicitly allowed and defended. If this was just some random comment, I wouldn't care that much, people can be a little problematic I don't care. But I don't want the sort of horrendous bullshit in that thread the mod posted in what I'd call a queer community.