this post was submitted on 07 May 2024
62 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30561 readers
21 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] FiniteBanjo@lemmy.today 21 points 6 months ago (17 children)

Idk, Kotaku isn't exactly a good source for ethics in this industry. They list something that every single large game company does: buy studios, move talent around, close the old studios. They also talk about how he claims to champion preservation and emulation, something we all agree with.

I vote he stays.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 17 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Yeah their head editors just left saying that they were being forced to write lower quality stories and things with agendas. I wouldn't trust Kotaku much anymore.

[–] Hdcase 5 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No one's asking you to trust them.

[–] scrubbles@poptalk.scrubbles.tech 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Just as a heads up, when you post an article, unless otherwise stated, you are telling people that the source can be trusted. So, yes in a way you are asking us to trust them

[–] regul@lemm.ee 8 points 6 months ago

It's an opinion piece. This isn't reporting. It says "Commentary" up at the top of the article.

I think you can "trust" when someone tells you that their opinion is actually their opinion. That's the only question of "trust" here.

There's an op-ed in the NYT right now titled At the Met Gala, Celebrities Are Nearly Nude. Are We Not Aroused? Do you trust that?

[–] t3rmit3 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

I vote he stays.

The article didn't say he needs to go, they said people need to stop treating him as though he is actually on the side of consumers and employees, rather than investors.

The literal last line of the article is

I hope moving forward Xbox fans and the media hold Spencer more accountable for future mistakes, cuts, and failures.

load more comments (15 replies)
[–] t3rmit3 19 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

As someone who used to really like Phil, I agree with this. He's clearly banking on his popularity as a "celebrity" within the gaming community to put a smiling spin on what is a clearly horrible business record.

The question here is not whether Microsoft does the same things that all businesses do (i.e. be evil Capitalist monstrosities that run people's livelihoods over in the name of investor greed)- that much is obvious.

The question is whether Phil Spencer is actively enabling this behavior and also covering for it- which he is.

And that is why, as the article suggests, people need to stop treating him as anything other than a corporate representative who wants to extract as much value as he can before it all runs into the ground.