this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
424 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37707 readers
34 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Whelp, here we go again

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] vertelleus 16 points 1 year ago (8 children)

Anyone hoping there will be a mass exodus from YouTube to other--maybe fediverse YouTube alternatives, reminiscent of the Reddit exodus?

[–] cupcakezealot@lemmy.blahaj.zone 18 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Video hosting is way too expensive and complex to be decentralised.

[–] flop@lemmy.fmhy.ml 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

PeerTube is a thing, though it seriously lacks content. It uses WebTorrent, so similar to how more popular torrents end up being faster rather than more taxed, wider use could lead to better stream stability. It's hard to compete with literally the largest video platform in the world, but there is a world were the tech could give a solid alternative community similar to mastodon or lemmy.

[–] soulsource@mastodon.gamedev.place 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@cupcakezealot @vertelleus Didn't Vuze (aka Azureus) try to build a decentralized streaming service once? I could see how this might work, if built on top of Kademlia and WebSeeds.

[–] itsmect@monero.town 1 points 1 year ago

It's too expensive to host videos for free, but paying fractional cents to different providers is difficult and none of us want to deal with the current ad-financed model either.

[–] amanneedsamaid@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

This. The only real alternative would need a great p2p video protocol and be extremely decentralized.

[–] SaltySalamander@lemmy.fmhy.ml 12 points 1 year ago (1 children)

fediverse YouTube alternatives

Yea, so who's hosting the videos and providing the bandwidth?

[–] Helix@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago

With peertube it's kinda all of us.

[–] Chobbes 9 points 1 year ago

YouTube is a very different scale of platform... There's probably ways that it could be done, and I know things like PeerTube do exist, but... Storing video is expensive, serving video is expensive, transcoding video is expensive... While I'd love to see it, I'd also worry a little bit about the retention of videos over time. YouTube's video archive is kind of insanely valuable, and it'd be a shame to have it disappear. Not that I necessarily think it's safe in Google's hands, mind you, I just worry that people self-hosting video would drop out pretty quickly.

[–] Invader753@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago

Yes I hope, but I don't see it happening. Creators will go where the masses are and where the money is.

[–] OneRedFox 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Well, PeerTube exists, but IDK how good it actually is since basically no one uses it. I also think professional content creators aren't going to like the Fediverse very much since there is significantly less money in it, but for hobbyists it could work. Of all the big social media platforms, video hosting/streaming is the hardest case to replace. It'll be interesting though. I hear PeerTube works like torrents.

[–] vertelleus 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I found rumble.com yesterday but I don't know much about it. It looks like at minimum it has Lofi Girl.

[–] OneRedFox 2 points 1 year ago

It's a chud site. I'd avoid it for the same reasons as Gab and Voat.

[–] menturi 4 points 1 year ago

I have heard of peertube as a fediverse-based alternative, but I have not heard of anybody actually talk about really using it.

[–] Evergreen5970 2 points 1 year ago

I’d really like one that allows timestamps. The only reason I haven’t taken my own unlisted personal videos off of YouTube is because they’re pretty long and really benefit from having timestamps I can easily click on, and because the video lengths and filesizes are longer than any alternative I know supports. I’d rather have the one big file instead of teeny little separated files. (I have been using YouTube as my video backup service for over a decade now.)

If you know of any private FOSS service even, that is less video sharing and more one-person-video-storage that has this feature I would love to know.

[–] SevYote@pawb.social 1 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't think video streaming is likely to be viable with a fedi-like model, unfortunately. Would love to see more creators move to Nebula, though. I don't think that would work for the casual youtubers I follow, but for the bigger producers, it'd be great.

[–] averyminya 1 points 1 year ago

Not quite the same but Odyssey formerly LBRY has always seems like a reasonable use of decentralized blockchain.