this post was submitted on 05 Dec 2023
737 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

430 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 7 points 10 months ago (4 children)
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 11 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Kinda, Not really.

The Suzuki Carry has a bed width of 1585mm (62.4") the Silverado has a max bed width of 64.8" (1646mm) so 60mm/2.5" wider. But the Silverado's bed isn't rectangular, ie if you want to lay something flat, the widest it can be is 50" (1270mm). That's a foot narrower than the Suzuki.

The Silverado has higher walls which imo isn't really a plus or minus. (More bulk materials, and less need to tie things down, but harder to access the things).

There are a lot of other differences in available configurations. I think the reason a lot of people prefer Silverados boil down to esthetics, and the perceptions of others. I think that for a lot of men, pickup trucks are an expression of their masculinity. They want something big and powerful that they can take into the woods and be manly^tm^ with.

A Carry is very practical and if I owned a landscaping business I think that's what I'd want my crews to be driving.

But also, I'm not a business owner. I'm a man and I get it. Honestly I'd way rather own that enormous impractical pickup. I'm more likely to be hauling hockey gear than lumber and drywall. I'm tall and girthy, I appreciate a spacious cab. I have child seats in my car.

Maybe men should stop pretending they don't care a lot about fun.

Edit to add: but I do agree we need society to be less car/truck centric.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago

The Suzuki Carry, like many kei trucks has foldable bed sidewalls, like those home Depot trucks. So Americans would never go for it as it's not sexy.

At $14,000 for a used 94 variant, not sure if it's worth it.

[–] Belzebubulubu@mujico.org 6 points 10 months ago

It's not about what you have, it's what you do with it. I have carried things in my small sedan that you would never believe. You are just underestimating japanese tech and Mexican capacity for not giving an f.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (2 children)

And taller. And it can haul far more weight. And simultaneously carry a team of workers.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 11 points 10 months ago (2 children)

Haven't seen a single one of those (right) hauling workers. On the other (left) hand, I've seen those haul workers every single time.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

That's anecdotal evidence, I've never even seen a kei truck in real life but that doesn't mean I think they aren't out there, and sure you could fit a couple guys up front. But I've seen plenty of teams of 4 or sometimes even more come piling out of a work truck. I'm currently in one with four people right now! And just to be clear I agree there are far too many trucks and not every suburban dad needs one, but you blame the driver not the truck. There are absolutely instances where a full size truck is the best vehicle for the job, just like there are instances where a kei truck makes far more sense.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 4 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Of course, but that doesn't mean one should get it. If you are gonna haul wood once a year, you are not BUYING a log trailer and just tow it behind you vehicle through the city all year - like a sensible person, you rent one for a day or two.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

I mean I literally said I agree with this in the comment you are replying too.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 3 points 10 months ago (1 children)

You did, but said I blame the driver not the truck. Who else to blame? The driver bought and is using the vehicle. I am not against using a vehicle for it's job, but so many drivers just don't do that.

I am sure the F-150 has a legitimate use, but it's seldom used to it's full potential, and for some reason it's MOSTLY used legitimately.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Yeah exactly get mad at the driver who buys a truck they don't need. But don't be mad at trucks simply for existing, they have good reasons to exist. That's the only point I'm trying to make.

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 10 months ago (1 children)

But I WAS blaming the drivers.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Idk why I thought otherwise lol that's my bad but yeah looking back I agree with all your comments lmao, it seems like there are others in this thread that just straight up don't think trucks should exist though lol

[–] derpgon@programming.dev 2 points 9 months ago

No problem, I misread stuff aswell. Let's agree to agree!

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Of course not, those are for construction managers. I usually see the workers driving Honda civics.

[–] PersnickityPenguin@lemm.ee 6 points 10 months ago (1 children)
[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 3 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Lol that thing is pretty cool! But there are a lot of jobs it couldn't do that you'd need a full size truck for!

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 7 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Ok this one then.

Or maybe a van which does all of the above and also keeps your stuff dry and locked away.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

Again, those are nice vehicles but can't replace a truck for certain things. A truck can haul much more weight and I wouldn't want a van because a lot of the time the stuff we're hauling is too big to fit inside or just straight up garbage and debris that I'd rather have in an outside bed.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

Ford F150 max payload: 1508kg

Renault Master max payload: 1,610kg

I mean the whole rest of the world seems to manage just fine without these, and we have tradesmen as well? The cabins can be as clean or dirty as you need, I've seen everything, loading trash or debris is also fine. If you're really carrying mostly gravel or other type of stuff like that then you'd have something specialized for that with a much bigger box than on your pickups, or rent it for the job.

But looking at your other comments in the thread I see that you're just set in your ideas and just looking at finding justifications for niche cases where it might be a superior vehicle, which I don't deny certainly exist, but that's not the problem, the problem is these are a dime a dozen if not the majority on your roads, and they're not at all good as normal vehicles whereas the vans are. Also they're honestly just superior in pretty much every way, flat bottom, low load-in height, can accept pallets, stuff stays dry, locked, engines are efficient and not crazy oversize and gaz-guzzling, they have good viewing angles at the front (e.g. you would see a child in front of the vehicle), etc etc etc.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 1 points 10 months ago (1 children)

So you agree with me than? Idk how many times I have to say yes I agree most people don't need trucks, I don't personally like trucks nor have I ever had one and I don't plan on ever getting one, but they should still exist for those niche cases (although there seems to be more than you think exist). I'll admit I was wrong about a trucks payload when compared to a van but it still wouldn't work for most of the work I do. If you wanna carry the four person team that I work with they'd have to sit in the back taking away from the space required to haul materials, not to mention even if we wanted to drop two guys and have the full cargo space we still wouldn't be able to haul as much as we can in our truck bed.

Also I agree vans are superior in a lot of ways, if they work for you I would absolutely suggest getting one instead of a truck, and some of your points are great but I gotta ask. You think trucks can't accept pallets?! I feel like it's far easier to put a pallet in a truck than a van lol. Not to mention you can stack multiple pallets on a truck! Also the low flat bottom is certainly a plus for some cases but that's negative for when we need to haul materials off road on some shitty lumpy mud trails. And as far as gas guzzling goes trucks have become a lot more efficient over the years, obviously they're still about the worst personal vehicles you can get as far as gas mileage goes but vans aren't that much better.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 2 points 10 months ago* (last edited 10 months ago) (1 children)

I think we do agree, it's hard to tell sometimes haha. I base my view that they're not needed by 99% of the population on the fact I see much less than 1% of them on our roads (thankfully) and everyone seems to be doing just fine.

I get it, they're kind of a middle ground trying to do it all but it fails at doing so imo and in the process, creates dangerous and polluting vehicles, compounded by the fact they're getting bought on whim or as social status but then never see the use they're supposed to be made for, just terrible all around.

But indeed I don't deny they can be good specialized vehicles, I just think these cases are <1% of the population like if you're chasing bears in the arctic or something, and certainly trades people etc would generally not need them and be better served by alternatives.

[–] SuperNinjaFury@lemm.ee 2 points 10 months ago

Lol I hear ya, especially over the internet! But yeah, we definitely agree that there are far too many trucks on the road and too many people buying trucks for dumb reasons.

[–] Cannacheques@slrpnk.net 1 points 10 months ago

Tbh I was going to say that at least some of the new fangled pick ups have easy to remove wheels, most of that stuff is easy to check, replace tires etc, but besides that from what I've been told they're as much a pain to drive as they are to giveaway to