m0darn

joined 1 year ago
[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I don't like homeless encampments, tent cities, favelas etc. They are unsafe, unclean and foster destructive behavior.

Let's destroy them by building safe, permanent homes for people.

It's so strange to me that "free market capitalism" lovers can't see that encampments are a market response. There is a large supply of unenclosed space (parks, sidewalks, underpasses) and an unmet demand for shelter. They shouldn't be surprised when market participants convert the former into the latter.

How effective do they think it will be to police every unenclosed space in the region vs building adequate shelter. Building shelter has all sorts of associated benefits too.

11
submitted 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) by m0darn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

Canadian homeless encampments have become increasingly visible in recent years, and those residing within them have faced a fair bit of variation in how local governments react to their presence. Today, let's look at a remarkable legal case that may change the game regarding how homeless encampments are considered under Canadian law and the Charter of Rights and Freedoms.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 2 weeks ago

Shockingly close

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 10 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

Imo the article writers probably feel that they are decrying the way people are demeaning her, but it's just adding visibility for the judgemental.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 3 weeks ago

You should look up time management strategies for people with ADHD because these are both classic symptoms.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago

I don't think endangering people is a good idea.

I'm surprised we haven't seen more infrastructure sabotage from ecoactivists. Train rails out of coal mines and into coal ports seem pretty vulnerable to acts that would reduce the profitability of burning coal.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I've also gotten the sense of a major schism between Jesse and the employees. I don't keep track of which employee has what views do in not really sure what you mean by Jan Wong's red scare.

I don't think Jesse was amplifying Israel's bullshit, I think he was pushing back against it.

I don't know if it's drifting right or not.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

Canadaland focuses on Canada, so Jesse tries to ask questions that are relevant to Canadians

journalism is supposed to be about distributing factual information

I have a friend in Canada that I know is trying to figure out if he should send his daughter to public school (eventually, she is still quite young) where she could face anti-Semitic treatment from peers/teachers, or Jewish day school where she could be murdered by extremists. (I think he was already more inclined towards public schools)

His concern is because of the increase in attacks on centers of Jewish community (eg schools & synagogues) in Canada. The increase in those attacks is because of Israel's disproportionate response to the Oct 7th attacks.

The question of Israel's accountability is probably quite relevant to him.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I agree it's strange and possibly inappropriate that the fact check was a text document, not a podcast.

But I really don't think he was acting as a mouthpiece the way you're accusing him. He repeatedly asked about the head of the Israeli military characterizing events as Jewish terrorism.

I think it's important to ask what responsibility Israel has for the safety of Jewish Canadians when hatecrimes rise as a result of Israeli military operations.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago (4 children)

Do you mean that the ambassador lied so much that his views shouldn't have been aired, or that the fact checking is unacceptably anti-Israel.

Or something else? I'm not sure how to interpret your statement.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 month ago

Yeah, coverage of Israeli/Palestinian conflict is notoriously filled with half truths and misleading implications. I think having a fact check co-published is quite useful.

I don't know what that guy's problem is.

I think Jesse did a good job. I'm extremely skeptical of the ambassador's explanation of the invitation to collaborate.

15
submitted 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) by m0darn@lemmy.ca to c/canada@lemmy.ca
 

...and a fact check of the statements made in the interview.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

I look at your diagram and see:

ϴ= L/(L+R)

And

2π-ϴ = L/R

I solved those (using substitution, then the quadratic formula) and got

L= π-1 ± √(1+π²) ~= 5.44 or -1.16

Whether or not a negative length is meaningful in this context is an exercise left to the reader

Giving (for L=5.44):

ϴ~= 0.845 ~~48.4° 

I'm surprised that it solved to a single number, maybe I made a mistake.

[–] m0darn@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Was that G7/8 kettling?

 

I'm trying to achieve variable speed control on two brushed DC motors powered by a 3s or 4s LiPo battery (~12V or 15V). This is for a nerf blaster I'm modifying, which is why I'm not using a pre-made speed control ie I want control over the shape/layout. I'd like to vary projectile speed with a thumb knob.

I just finished watching ElectricMonkeyBrain's YouTube video on the TL494 PWM chip.

I was initially planning to vary the duty cycle with a potentiometer on the chip's control pin, to get a PWM signal and feed that into a MOSFET. But in the video he mentions that the chip has an integrated over current protection function. Ie the chip will

monitor the voltage across a sense resistor in series with the load 

and will

kill the output if the sensed voltage/current goes above a reference voltage

It occured to me that I could actually adjust the reference voltage as a way to control the motor speed.

Would this be a better way to achieve speed control and protect my motors/battery? Or is it a terrible idea altogether.

 

I met a Ukrainian today. He is my age. I met him at school drop off, our sons are in the same kindergarten class.

They recently arrived here from overseas. I welcome them, but I wish we had done more to help Ukraine.

There are numerous places in the world where people are being displaced by state violence, but I don't think there's anywhere that it's being done by a global power so directly. It's similar to Gaza/Palestine & Israel, but Russia can end the war by simply going home.

If we had been meeting our NATO obligations for the last 30 years, would this family have been driven out of their home? I don't know. (I actually know almost nothing about their personal circumstances)

I just feel like we should have done more, and that it's not too late.

 

I have recently rewatched the movies Inside Out and Home Alone, having previously seen them while childless (I.O. as a young adult, H.A. many times at various ages).

The parental behavior draws a lot more of my attention, and it really changes the movie for me.

The parental panic when they don't know where their kid is, or if they're safe, just hits so much harder. Like, it's not that I didn't understand the movie before, I guess I just have a new appreciation for the parents emotions.

Are there any other movies that you appreciate differently now that you have different experiences?

 

The cyclist was riding on the sidewalk, and ran a red light (a bit more justified to flag him down). He fled, eventually ditching the bike and fleeing by foot.

I hope the police didn't screw up by performing an unjustified search.

 

My neighbour (40/m) ("N") confided that his recently retired father (70/m) ("G") has started going to the casino twice a day (all day but he comes home for dinner).

G's losses affect the food they eat (multi generational household).

N doesn't really know what to do. I'm not so concerned for N, moreso his mother/G's wife.

It's not my business but, when I was a kid my boyscout leader committed suicide after gambling away his house so I'm pretty sensitive to this sort of thing. I'd like to help if I can.

Any advice?

32
submitted 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) by m0darn@lemmy.ca to c/homestead@lemmy.ca
 

This goose has adopted my parents, and is attempting to establish residency in their cabin. We suspect it is domestic and escaped from its coop. It's a seasonal cabin and they're planning to close up soon. What should they do? Central Ontario. Near Bracebridge.

UPDATE: A neighbor of theirs is set up for chickens, so could accommodate a goose. And shortly after making that arrangement an ad appeared in the community message board. So the goose is going home.

 

Wikipedia says

A superhero or superheroine is a stock character that typically possesses superpowers, abilities beyond those of ordinary people, and fits the role of the hero, typically using their powers to help the world become a better place, or dedicating themselves to protecting the public and fighting crime.

So yes, he is definitely dedicated to protecting the public, but it feels wrong to call him a super hero. What do you think?

view more: next ›