ora

joined 1 year ago
 
[–] ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 year ago

They found 196's one weakness...

[–] ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I disagree with the use of the term "profitable" because it's a non-profit and so donations aren't going to investors or anything. Wikimedia is very transparent and efficient with donations according to Charity Navigator. That said, they do take in more in donations every year than they pay in expenses. See the financial reports they make public.

[–] ora@lemmy.blahaj.zone 8 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

I thought you meant Microsoft Java.