kvjxq

You said:

you're making a judgement about the person you're speaking to

My rephrasing makes no such assumptions. It is a general statement, and as someone who works in digital forensics, it's one I stand by. Anyone who cares about their privacy or security will run screaming from the Apple ecosystem.

"Anyone who uses an iPhone doesn't give a shit about privacy or security." There you go.

What hostility? It's a publicly available fact that iPhone is terrible for privacy and security. Anyone who's interested in this app and is using an iPhone isn't serious about either.

Again - you're being deliberately obtuse. I'm not going to converse with someone who is so determined to ignore my substantive point.

Lol, I'm sincerely not sure whether this is a joke? If so, bravo, this is hilarious.

I like how you conveniently ignored the second sentence in my comment.

how weird it is that doing sex for money on camera generally is seen as distinct from doing sex for money off camera, even though that's effectively an arbitrary legal and moral distinction to make. you can't even point to an obvious difference between the two that justifies the distinction

This is just obtuse - sex on camera isn't done for the gratification of the participants. None of the people engaged in the sexual act is paying to get off.

Yaaaay, more consumer-hostile ipads with wheels.

Thanks for telling us, this was a great contribution to the discussion.

The fact that this poor mentally ill person was ever in the news is depressing as fuck. Stop gawking and get this guy some therapy.

Are downvotes disabled here? If so, why?

Thanks!