this post was submitted on 24 Aug 2022
10 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10180 readers
15 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] kvjxq 1 points 2 years ago (2 children)

I like how you conveniently ignored the second sentence in my comment.

[–] alyaza 3 points 2 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) (1 children)

I like how you conveniently ignored the second sentence in my comment.

yes: because it's wrong, unless you think absolutely nobody pays for porn (and that most people don't accordingly do porn because they are being paid to engage in an on-camera sexual behavior). you are making a distinction in the causal actions that lead to the creation of most on-camera sexual acts and the causal actions that lead to most sex work being done, when there practically isn't one. both are being done as a voluntary exchange of services and/or goods between consenting people.

[–] kvjxq 1 points 2 years ago

Again - you're being deliberately obtuse. I'm not going to converse with someone who is so determined to ignore my substantive point.

[–] remington 1 points 2 years ago

None of the people engaged in the sexual act is paying to get off.

That's the second sentence that you are referring to, right?

Please, reiterate the point you are trying to make.