Surprising number of people taking this seriously.
kibiz0r
Seems like a pointless waste of time for a first-party effort, when they could be… Idk, implementing the audio manipulation APIs that Discord relies on, or something.
But I don’t necessarily see direct harm from it either. Just useless.
Fingernail Spiderhole
As it was with standardized testing, so shall it be with personal behavior: the goal is not to inform the student why, but to enforce compliance.
I haven’t tried it yet, but GrayJay purports to be an aggregator along those lines: https://grayjay.app/
“Women are the most vulnerable in the world and the most vulnerable are the most vulnerable”
Aren’t MP3s just a statistical correlation?
Besides, you really don’t need to zoom in on “but muh license agreement” to roast these AI turds.
They’re very clear: We’re gonna put creatives out of work, we’re gonna sell a unified product to replace them, and we’re gonna use their own labor to build their replacements.
That’s anticompetitive.
Nail em on that instead of trying to thread the needle on reining in the tech lords without damaging e.g. linguistic analysis researchers.
Crash reporting, probably.
Tap for spoiler
They gonna rat you out to the feds if you divide by zero.
It’s worth checking out Louis Rossmann’s take too: https://youtu.be/TF4zH8bJDI8
I rarely ever find myself disagreeing with either of them, so this is an interesting situation.
Edit: This is also a good take about live service, separate from the "Stop Killing Games" initiative: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=NO38QvKraTQ
They been sellin us out since the start. And they never even paid for us!