You can say the same about classical media like books or TV. Maybe, AI is more persuading?
Endward23
joined 11 months ago
Sounds like a lot of hight mathematics.
Its really a interesting piece. Thanks!
Capitalism is growth based. It requires infinite growth in order to operate normally, and we are on a finite planet.
I see your point but for "academic reasons", is there any proof of this claim.
Nothing within socialism points to growth of any kind, and well-structured socialism can even function well under degrowth conditions.
have to disagree strongly.
- Older individuals needs help from the socity in order to survive and have goods like clothes and so on.
- The help in questions has to be provided my at least middle aged individuals. They must spend resources like money, energy etc. on it.
- If you have significant more older individuals than younger ones, you got a really problem with the resources.
Even a socialistic society has to follow this logic since their resources, like the workforce of younger people, are limited.
The situation we'll face in the near future, the situation of having more and more older individuals, while we need resources for a lot of other fields like AI, political stuff and clima, would be problem in any human society. In every society which suffer the problem of limited resources.
Google "Deep Bach".
Does this mean that writing by hand is an important mental exercise?
capitalism is not the problem here, sorry.
The same problem would arise in a hypothetical socialist socity.
IMHO, a UBI is just an option in the case that all production is made by machines. If a sector of people is still forced to work, they will not accapt it.
Services like nurses or that like may be something other...
Many so called "deep fakes" are in fact just pardies, pieces of art and so on putting withour the context or reclaimed with another backstroy.
The initial case to creat a picture may be legit, while a internet troll or even a actuall agent with an political agency use the pic out of context.
Lets provide an example. Lets say I would make a caricature of a politican for a meme. After that, somebody else comming, taking the caricature and make something different out of it. Fake News for instance. Where comes the problem with "deep fakes" in? As far as I see, Fair Use protects the first step. Its allowed to make caricatures from politicans. The second step doesn't actually make a deep fake, just use a picture that was there before.
Yet againt. More power for the EU central gouverment and their officials and authorities. I don't see a change in favour of the usual citizen, here.
Lol