this post was submitted on 26 Nov 2023
1 points (100.0% liked)

Watches

10 readers
1 users here now

A community for watch & horology discussion.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

I was walking by the San Francisco Swatch store and dropped in to take a look at the Blancpain collaboration. The Swatch employee said they still only had limited colors of the MoonSwatch available but every color of the Blancpain was in stock. I’m not interested in either but it confirmed my suspicions that the Blancpain isn’t nearly as popular as the MoonSwatch, especially at the higher price point.

top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Caruso08@alien.top 2 points 11 months ago

Casuals don't know Blancpain, they don't care if the watch is automatic.

The moonswatch was so popular because a majority of people know Omega,being the first of the limited releases also built up hype, and people actually got to feel and see that the quality is the same as a swatch (which personally I'm not sure why people expected anything else from a $260 dollar watch)

Apart from that the colors are garish.

[–] eta2750@alien.top 2 points 11 months ago

To be expected. Blancpain has never been a "cool" brand. The Fifty Fathoms is ugly and dated. Sparse to a fault, like those Unimatic watches. Just my opinion, to each their own. It's also $400 plastic watch that can't be serviced. The ETA quartz movement in the Moonswatch runs on batteries and objectively has a longer theoretical service life vs a sistem51 movement.

The color selection is hideous. There's no "Mission to the Moon" option available. Imagine a black on black bezel option with the iconic yellow/red no rads indicator...but of course people would never bother buying the real thing if that were the case. The Fifty Fathoms doesn't have the same mythological pull that the Moonwatch has.

[–] Zehcomputerguy@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

As others have stated they are overhyped “watches” that can’t even be serviced. People paying hundreds for a disposable watch.

[–] bchhun@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I was there on Friday and they did not have a full stock of blancpain. So they must have got a delivery recently.

[–] rowthecow@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Omega has more brand goodwill than blanc

[–] sdujour77@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Good. The entire idea cheapens the brand names involved.

[–] PacificTridentGlobel@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Yes it does. They ruined Blancpain in my book. I had two BPs and sold them both when they did that. I’ll never buy another.

[–] Zenis@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

When I visited the Vegas Swatch store they were sold out, but had half the Moonswatch solar system. I may have picked one up if they had any 🤷🏼‍♂️

[–] Helenius@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

I was in Berlin a month ago, people was still lining up outside the SWATCH store. No idea if it was for the Blancpain or MoonSwatch.

I could buy any colour the MoonSwatch in Bangkok 8 months ago.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] SeikoWIS@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

A quartz chrono makes so much more sense for a disposable plastic watch than a $400 automatic.

[–] Ashi4Days@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Not that many people know about the Blancpain as brand. More people probably know what a speedmaster at a glance than know what a Blancpain is. On top of all of that, the MoonSwatch/Speedmaster looks better.

[–] enzo32ferrari@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The MoonSwatch was cool cause the colors made sense and actually looked good. None of the Blancpain colors look good.

[–] rgb3x3 1 points 11 months ago

I just looked them up for the first time and they look like plastic children's toys that you'd get at Walmart.

[–] BWFTW@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Imo the color choices also make a difference. The moonswatch color choices are fun, all look amazing, and some of them tap into unique heritage like the hands on the mission to Mars. The blancpain colors on the other hand are pretty much all ugly but 2. I saw a few comments talking about how bad they looked on the leak and new right away this was a dud from the get go. Not much the price is absurd. That's actual good watch money. You could buy a quartz prx for around that, a bunch of seikos. Just a bad pricepoint for novelty. I also think the automatic movement moves it into more watch enthusiast space, where as the moonswatch had more mainstream appeal. And watch enthusiast are going to more critical of a trash automatic then a quartz watch imo

[–] MotherAd1865@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (11 children)

Even on this sub there are far fewer people posting their Swatch x Blancpain.
I think it's a combination of things: the higher price-point, Blancpain being less popular than Omega, and the watch craze is starting to die down a bit. People had lots of free time and extra cash during the pandemic years - that's been changing this past year or so.

[–] dd1989NL@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Dont forget.. the moonwatch looks kind of cool.. this one is uggly as hell.. there is just no way looking at it and admiring the looks..

[–] TheHrethgir@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Kind of weird that the colors the picked for each ocean are based on sea slugs. I get the idea, but still... slugs.

[–] sns_bns@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I haven't seen one in person, but I actually like it on the photos. I would even buy one if it was cheaper.

[–] greyblacknavytan@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think you’re right on all points. I’m surprised they didn’t just do a Seamaster instead. I assume they’re waiting for the next Bond film and we’ll see a Swatch X Omega Seamaster X Bond watch.

[–] judahrosenthal@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

Seamaster would get great but Swatch Group is desperate to make Blancpain relevant. So far, no good.

[–] XwoeX@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

They should start by shrinking the FF 3 millimeters

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] 3d_extra@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

They could have tried a lot of other things first.

[–] J22Jordan@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago
[–] 3d_extra@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The designs being ugly is also a big factor.

[–] Pargula_@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

I think also a lot of people got burnt out on the whole cheap expensive brand watch thing with the Moonswatch getting so much coverage.

But besides that, brand is the biggest thing. Most non-watch people know Omega as a brand. Blancpain has very little if any recognition outside of our circle, hell, even many people who are into watches don't know about Blancpain.

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments (7 replies)
[–] CheGuevarasRolex@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The Speedy is a fine watch, and Moonswatch did a good job capturing the look of the real think in a plastic package. It’s an attractive watch even if it’s clearly a toy version of it.

The true Fifty Fathoms is a very distinguished watch, but the Swatch FF looks like the worst kind of plastic McDonald’s toy imaginable, while also charging you even more money.

The Moonswatch is a meme but it is an attractive meme. The FF is a hideous meme.

[–] EBXLBRVEKJVEOJHARTB@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The FF doesn't have the same hype as the Speedmaster

[–] Patient_Fox_6594@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The watch community seems rather disdainful of both of them overall. Flawed watches for high prices is my impression of the general discontent with them.

[–] zagggh54677@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

50 fathoms….300 ft. 😂

They look cool to me, would be a cool backup dive watch

[–] bagoflees@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The rating was accomplished by them in the early 1950s. It was a big deal. The name stuck.

[–] Dark1000@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I don't know if it's a dud. The sales are obviously not going to be as high as with the Moonswatch, but without any inside knowledge, there's no way of knowing. They could certainly have met or exceeded expectations.

However, I suspect that you are at least in the right direction. They aren't heavily promoted in the stores during the most important sales period of the year. The Simpsons donut watch is all over the Swatch stores I've see , with the Blancpain collection off in the corner with the rest of the regular Swatches. They clearly aren't leading with it for Christmas, and we're only a couple of months on.

Watch YouTubers and hobbyists aren't the general public, and that's where Swatch lives.

[–] Zamboni4201@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (5 children)

$400 is really high for a Swatch.

Growing up, their watches were $40-$50. And they were popular. You wore them for a year or two, and when they were too beat up, you bought another one. Anyone could buy them.

Today, they’re $80-$110.

So they drop the Moonswatch. $250 is high, but the economy was better, the watch was a novelty, many people know the Speedmaster was the first watch on the Moon. Omega has marketed the Speedy for 50+ years. Billions of billboards, bus shelters, and magazine ads. Also, the moonswatch had cool models related to our solar system. People could identify with those models.
Sold like wild fire.

$400 for a plastic Blancpain?
Who, outside of serious watch collectors, knows anything about a 50 Fathoms or any Blancpain watches? If you surveyed 50 people on the street about 50 Fathoms, 50 of them would give you a blank look.

Even the average Swatch customer, when entering the store, will google Blancpain 50 Fathoms to see what the original watch looked like and then figure out the association. And it’s still $400.

[–] Nerazzurro9@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Exactly. The Moonswatch didn’t just have the timing and the novelty factor going for it—both of which were huge—but also the fact that pretty much everyone who has even a passing familiarity with watches knows what a Speedmaster is. Probably second only to various Rolex models on the “oh yeah, I’ve heard of that before” familiarity scale. You have to be relatively deep into watches already to know or care what the Fifty Fathoms is — and most of those people probably aren’t the types who will buy a $400 plastic Swatch.

[–] espressolemon@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Right, and those who were interested in Fifty Fathoms and a fun take… probably had WAY more fun with the Fifty Phantoms

[–] Pargula_@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (3 children)

I'm surprised they are still in business tbh. $110 is a loy for their cheap, plastic watches, specially compared to what you can get from other brands, like Casio, at that price point.

I was going to buy one in Switzerland as a chrap souvenir of my trip, thinking they'd be like 50 bucks, I was shocked when I saw the prices.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] manjamanga@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Of course it is. Nobody other than watch enthusiasts ever heard the name Blancpain before.

[–] Aquafina_lol@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

The price point was way too high.

[–] fusiongt021@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

End of the day it's just a Swatch. Enjoy it if you like it but I could see how the general consumer wouldn't know Blancpain versus how most will know Omega.

[–] Ezodan@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I think about 1% of the population heard about blancpqin as a brand. For omega that's like 50-70 times more people. On top of that can you name me an iconic piece from blanpain that you would want a cheaper copy of? Millions want a omega moonwatch an icon for any space and watchlovwr.

[–] Astropin@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

What immediately turned me off is they are not serviceable. If it breaks down...which it will...you get to toss in the garage.

[–] Wh1tePo1nter@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

Hopefully people have realised what BS marketing gimmicks both watches are. I can't imagine paying $400 for a plastic disposable watch.

[–] Red_Trapezoid@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

People without money are not going to buy something like that and people with money are going to buy something better.

I like many others are in the financial position of "too poor to buy cheap". But these collabs aren't even that cheap all things considered. That is a very expensive Swatch, what's the point?

[–] kapparino-feederino@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

The moonswatch in itself is already a really bad value watch tbh

The blancpain is more painful pricing

[–] DCLexiLou@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago (2 children)

And completely unserviceable. It’s literally a throw away. Shameful.

[–] kapparino-feederino@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

its crazy how they got so hyped up.

like u can get a Seiko Speedtimer the solar quarts one for the same price as some grey market moonswatch and people stills buy a plastic toy watch over it.

i just don't get the hype for it. bad value for MSRP awful value for the grey market price.

blancpain one is awful value but atleast its not hyped.

im all for accesibility but i really don't think these watches are it

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Low_Map4314@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

This is the problem with BlancPain as a whole. Good product, but massively overpriced.

[–] chicaneuk@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

In some respects I am glad.. the Moonswatch, I would imagine, sold way beyond Swatches wildest expectations and presumably they thought they had a sure fire cash cow lined up going forward. At least disappointing sales on the Blancpain collab will cause some kind of pause / reset / rethink on whether this model works on other watches.

[–] WSBGamer@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

It looks like it costs $25 to manufacture.

[–] curious_throwaway_55@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

What the fuck is a blancpain

  • 98% of consumers
[–] obedevs@alien.top 1 points 11 months ago

I’ve been casually into watches for a while and I’m a bit embarrassed to admit that I only heard about Blancpain this year (I’m 34 years old). I knew the Omega name before I was even a teenager. I bet if you ask 100 random people on the street 99 of them will have heard of Omega

load more comments
view more: next ›