this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
264 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

217 readers
18 users here now

What's going on Canada?



Communities


🍁 Meta


🗺️ Provinces / Territories


🏙️ Cities / Local Communities


🏒 SportsHockey

Football (NFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Football (CFL)

  • List of All Teams: unknown

Baseball

Basketball

Soccer


💻 Universities


💵 Finance / Shopping


🗣️ Politics


🍁 Social and Culture


Rules

Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca also apply here. See the sidebar on the homepage:

https://lemmy.ca


founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
top 20 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

There’s a fundamental misunderstanding of how different governments operate in different countries. China’s government operates from the top down (from Xi Jinping down to the national, province, and municipality level). Russia’s government operates through state-linked enterprises that are definitely not government-owned. America’s government operates from the bottom up (from PACs and lobbying groups up to the federal government). American state-sponsored electoral interference is an inherently different problem than Chinese or Russian interference because there are many American actors at play. These include those American PACs and SIGs and other lobbying groups looking to use their billions of dollars in funding to push their ideals around the world by directly and indirectly interfering with foreign elections.

At the end of the day, foreign interference is anything that leads to Canada pursuing activities not in its own best interest from anyone that isn’t Canadian (if we want to fuck ourselves up, we have that right) and funded with non-Canadian money. This has clearly happened from Chinese, Russian, AND American sources and it needs to stop if we want to protect our democracy.

[–] frankyboi@lemmy.ca 22 points 1 year ago

Koch brothers already funds most center right think tanks in Canada. like Fraser Institute and institut économique de Montréal .

[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because that would mean acknowledging we’re very vulnerable to this type of thing and in Canada we like to pretend bad stuff just isn’t happening. It’s easier that way for our politicians to focus the ire of Canadians on bike lanes than to face this kind of stuff head on. Example: news is no longer talking about ~corporate price gouging~ inflation as if it suddenly isn’t happening anymore. We need something else to be outraged about! Argh!

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The simple answer to this is that our democracy has degraded to finding problems rather than finding solutions. Problems are easy, while solutions are hard… but problems get clicks. Maybe it’s a good thing that Google and Meta banned Canadian journalism because it means that we can go back to more in-depth journalism?

[–] Clevermistakes@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don’t think the ban will last though. They caved to Australia after a few days and they’re even smaller than we are.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 year ago

We will see…

[–] JizzmasterD@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

This is a good step.

We need to go back to speaking and reporting more about the weather, geography and its impact in shaping culture. In a “post truth” era it’s a good unifier, harder to manipulate and dads like it.

[–] psvrh@lemmy.ca 16 points 1 year ago

Because they're white people, and their backers are rich.

That's all you need to know. The far-right is allowed more latitude because, at least for now, they're useful idiots for the wealthy who can use their votes to further the agenda of tax cuts and deregulation. The problem is of the "riding the tiger" variety: at some point, the rabble will get out of control, and some of the wealthy will have their Fritz Thyssen moment.

[–] Rentlar@lemmy.ca 14 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Americans have money, and there is plenty of money in taking part in the grift...

Even the US supreme court has become a mockery of its former self, and is reflective of their system as a whole. By the rich, for the rich.

The Supreme Court has always been a corrupt problem from the Dred Scott decision to buck v bell to Plessy v Ferguson and so many more the supreme court has always despite some decisions moving some things forward generally been a force to stifle civil liberties in the interests of the propertied class.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 11 points 1 year ago

Many of us do consider it foreign interference.

However the people who complain the loudest at the current government about foreign interference seems to have hitched their wagon to the same ideas as these particular foreign interfereers.

[–] floofloof@lemmy.ca 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Part of the problem is that the Conservatives welcome it because they see it will help them in elections.

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 8 points 1 year ago

Oh, for sure. All the more reason for electoral reform.

[–] MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

Yeah, k, but how would you even start to combat grassroots interference like that? At least with China there is an organization that you can monitor and counteract. A far as I can see, with this type of "interference" we're stuck chasing ghosts and battleing hydras.

[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Long term, by growing our population.

[–] MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] lightrush@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The same reason it works for the US. A bigger population, all else being equal, means higher economic output and therefore larger political influence internationally relative to other players. If Canada had 1B population, groups in the US would have found it much harder to exert any significant influence over our politics given how much louder than them our voices would be. By voices think all types political voces, individual, collective, etc.

[–] MyFeetOwnMySoul@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I think there is an underlying assumption that our current situation with the right is largely due to external influences. I'm of the opinion, that while the expression of the ideology is globally crowdsourced, we would have a similar percentage of wingnuts with or without American influence.

It seems to me that the economic disenfranchisement of the average Canadian is the primary force polarizing people politically, which would also explain the simultaneous resurgence of fascism globally (notibly, outside of the anglosphere)

[–] AgreeableLandscape@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

Because we're their pet.

[–] sagacity 2 points 1 year ago

America’s far right is operating across the entire Anglo-sphere.

Can’t blame the government for that, the shared language,culture and perceived issues is what allows cross-contamination.

load more comments
view more: next ›