this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
12 points (100.0% liked)

Lemmy

496 readers
1 users here now

Everything about Lemmy; bugs, gripes, praises, and advocacy.

For discussion about the lemmy.ml instance, go to !meta@lemmy.ml.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
top 8 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 20 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better than disabling it:

  • Understand it - low score boils down to "people don't want to see it". Everything else is assumption, and should be taken with a grain of salt.
  • Deal with it - you won't be able to please everyone all the time.
  • Vote - if you see some post/comment that you feel like undeservedly downvoted, by all means, upvote it.

I still wish that downvoting was multidimensional though. Negative feedback is important.

[–] SomeBoyo@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Could you elaborate on multidimensional up-/downvoting?

[–] lvxferre@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Imagine a system that works like this:

  • upvotes - a simple click, as it is now
  • downvotes - you click the downvote button, and then specify a reason from a list (disagreeable, unfunny, inaccurate, off-topic, rude, disingenuous, etc.)

So it's a bit like Slashdot, but only for negative reactions.

Each "reason" would be a dimension, as now you can measure content by funniness, accuracy, etc. And one of the effects of this system is that, if you are being downvoted, you'll have a better grasp on why. It's considerably more useful as feedback, for users in good faith.

(It has a few additional advantages too; for example custom sorting filters, and the very fact that a downvote takes a tiiiny bit more effort than an upvote should encourage positive feedback over negative one.)

[–] NoTime@lemmy.one 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It's partly why I joined lemmy.one as they disable downvotes.

[–] deegeese@sopuli.xyz 1 points 1 year ago

Oh good, downvotes still work here.

Yes they’re meaningless internet points, but downvotes serve a real purpose.

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 year ago

Also beehaw

[–] Engywuck@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just engage, if you disagree with people. Engagement is much more useful than just donwoting and exposes different point of views.

[–] MuffinMangler 1 points 1 year ago

Unless they're trolls or unwilling to engage in good faith discussions because then you're just promoting their views and wasting your time.

Also not every comment is worth engaging. Some are so shit that you should just downvote so no one has to see it.

load more comments
view more: next ›