this post was submitted on 12 Oct 2023
245 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37742 readers
73 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 19 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] alyaza 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Six months later, we can see that the effects of leaving Twitter have been negligible. A memo circulated to NPR staff says traffic has dropped by only a single percentage point as a result of leaving Twitter, now officially renamed X, though traffic from the platform was small already and accounted for just under two percent of traffic before the posting stopped. (NPR declined an interview request but shared the memo and other information). While NPR’s main account had 8.7 million followers and the politics account had just under three million, “the platform’s algorithm updates made it increasingly challenging to reach active users; you often saw a near-immediate drop-off in engagement after tweeting and users rarely left the platform,” the memo says.

[–] mp3@lemmy.ca 47 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Hopefully that hurts the social media platforms more than they want to admit.

[–] GammaGames 27 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It does, social media is very headline driven. I’m not surprised traffic wasn’t affected much

[–] loke@fedia.io 18 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It can't be headline driven if you remove the headlines. Musk, probably

[–] GammaGames 7 points 1 year ago

All for the E S T H E T I C

[–] athos77@kbin.social 54 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Danielle Nett, an editor with NPR’s engagement team, writes in the staff memo that spending less time on Twitter has helped with staff burnout. “That’s both due to the lower manual lift — and because the audience on Threads is seemingly more welcoming to publishers than on platforms like Twitter and Reddit, where snark and contrarianism reign,” Nett writes.

Snark and contrarianism, on reddit?! I'm shocked!

[–] ultratiem@lemmy.ca 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Plenty of snark and contrarianism on Threads don’t know what dafuq they are talking about, sounds like nonesense.

[–] agressivelyPassive@feddit.de 14 points 1 year ago

There are just less people on Threads.

[–] HappyMeatbag 42 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Good. I hope people and organizations keep leaving.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The level of ad dollars flying away from Twitter this year has been staggering. Elon has come back from a lot of shit in the past, but I don't think he'll ever be able to recover it from this, it's just going to be a long circle downward. He's truly lost the plot on this one, and the world's already moved on. Truth be told, I haven't understood Twitter for years anyways, but that's just me.

Ad buyers are demanding accountability for their spends. They want to see justifiable results from their campaigns, so that means heavy measurement that can attribute their spend to quantifiable lifts. Meanwhile, over at twitter? You have a billionaire having a mid life crisis and sticking his thumbs in his ears going lalalalala, pissing off his entire user base and basically taking stances on his platform that no reasonable ad buyers can realistically support. Also doesn't help when your user base is quickly turning into mostly far right wing maniacs. Not going to survive this new age of advertising, when that's pretty much your whole funding model.

[–] dumples@kbin.social 24 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I think everyone is seeing that the worth of social media isn't worth what you need to pay now

[–] tal@lemmy.today 5 points 1 year ago (1 children)

said dumples on social media

[–] dumples@kbin.social 9 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Is fediverse social media? I never considered reddit or this social media. More like a forum

[–] flipht@kbin.social 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's social media in the technical definition - it's a place to view media, both entertainment and news, with commentary, groups, the ability to follow someone, etc. Which makes it social.

But yeah, it's not quite like Facebook/Instagram/LinkedIn. A little bit like Twitter though.

[–] dumples@kbin.social 6 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah. I guess you're right. I just don't follow anyone and without real names it seems different

[–] Gaywallet 6 points 1 year ago

Different kinds of social media have different focuses. Reddit and forum style have a bit less focus on the person and more focus on the content than Twitter because of how people interact with the platform itself. Twitter is very person centric, encouraging you to follow people to cut through the noise. Having communities which surface voted content puts more emphasis on the community than the individual and draw out the timeframe of algorithm engagement.

[–] GrindingGears@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 year ago

I think you are going to start seeing an ad exodus from social, that's my prediction. Connected TV ad spend is going to be what catches all the ad dollars in 2024, especially if Netflix and Amazon start sliding towards exposing their viewers to more ads. Social media is going to start its long decline as a result, turning into pay to play as they all try to survive a world with declining ad revenues.

[–] uphillbothways@kbin.social 15 points 1 year ago

Being insufferable is a great way to become redundant. Doesn't matter if you're a platform or a person, rich or poor. Anything can be more trouble than it's worth. And if you are given the chance to stop and think about it, it's probably been true for a while already.

[–] Iwasondigg@lemmy.one 11 points 1 year ago

To the surprise of no one.