A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions
Search asklemmy π
If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!
Looking for support?
Looking for a community?
~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~
From what I've seen, people who focus on things like "bullet sponginess" and "god tier" generally don't like it. People who don't care as much about stuff like that and look for worldbuilding and story love it.
Personally, I think people who are looking for perfect gameplay are looking at the wrong things in cyberpunk. If you want an awesome shooter, go play overwatch or something, you don't play Cyberpunk because it has perfect gameplay, you play it because of the world they built.
'perfect worldbuilding' is amazing and im not going to attack a book for not having combat features but when combat is intended to be such a large feature in the game youre being too easy on the devs and doing yourself a disservice by saying that is just isnt a big feature / a concern at all, youre treating this like a walking simulator. expecting a game with such large emphasis on its combat to have balanced combat isnt perfection - it's the bare minimum. it's good you enjoyed it but admittedly the bar you have is very low
so it's shit
yes, my point proven exactly. If you go in hyper critical looking for things wrong with it, you're going to find things wrong with it. It's so much fun to focus on those things, refuse to play it (or buy then return after 2 hours saying it's shit), and then continue to complain online.
I've played 3 full playthroughs since release, and as someone who doesn't even know what bullet sponginess is - I've had a blast with the game. Being hyper critical and having ultra high expectations is a sure fire way to make sure you enjoy a lot less in life.
i beat the game 30+ hours first week of release. i gave it a full hearted chance. youre telling me im being nitpicky by saying the combat is an unbalanced mess?
Yes. That is what I'm saying.
Yes, it does get a bit easy towards the end, even on higher difficulties. That did not make me say it was a bad game at all though, you asked if it is "good" now. I think it's always been good, but I personally don't care about things like bullet sponginess or if I got "too many headshots". I just had a fun time playing it.
no it's not about how hard it is to get headshots it's about how little damage you inflict relative to you takw throughout the whole game, that whole 'god or balloon' imbalance causes combat to slog. that isnt a nitpick, thats one of the most important things a combat game (yes it's other things too) can have. it's nice you enjoyed though and i appreciate yourbhelp
Sounds to me like you should've invested in quickhack upgrades. Those can really help out in tough combat encounters.
It's an above average game. If you want a faced paced shooter it's not what you are looking for.. if you are looking for a game with a lively world, interesting characters and story telling, with some shooting attached, this game is awesome
Easily an 8/10 in it's current state. If you just want to shoot stuff and nothing else play something like doom eternal.
i never said i just wanted to shoot stuff, i can demand basic combat functionality and still want to play a game for stuff besides combat
Itβs only shit if you suck at games. The game plays fine. Could it be improved? Sure. Is it shit? No.
punch a tree in real life, doesnt come down in one hit? git gud
In my opinion it's not, the gameplay is still terrible and the writing nothing special.
Lol you've been downvoted for sharing your opinion after specifically being asked to do so. Also not a single person at the time I write this has provided a reason for why the game is good in their opinion. Great thread!
I guess we are Reddit now, only one opinion is accepted on any subject.
Of course this is Reddit now. Itβs filled with people from Reddit, worse, active people from Reddit. What was the expectation here?
Personally I enjoyed the gameplay and found the writing to be so so with some really good moments and some awkward and awful ones (River hitting on a female V, I was with Judy and was frosty with him at every opportunity and he still went on as if I was leading him on. Like MF I could not have been clearer.)
That River thing is just peak social commentary
your example is so funny cause if i asked my female friends rhatd be accurate lol
Yeah my wife was watching and was like βYup, accurate.β
That and the Netrunner at the Afterlife saying βGood girlβ after returning a job made my skin crawl.
Keeping it spoiler free: at one point my female V was walking past a bunch of the Barghest gang who were non-aggressive, but making degrading comments. One said something about "coming back on all fours" and I turned around and mono-wired his head right off. The entire gang went aggro and I had to kill about 50 of them. Worth it, will do it again next playthrough.
I'm still cut that the only male romance option for female V is a cop, and a creep on top of it
They may have changed it, but I recall the romances were entirely dependent on which voice you chose. Genitalia didn't matter. So you can theoretically make a feminine V with the male voice if you want those male on male options.
Male voiced V is so boring though... The actor has such a limited range of emotion in his lines...
I played it originally upon release and my biggest problem with the game was that none of the RPG elements mattered. It also felt more like a linear campaign with various irrelevant side missions.
Is it still pretty much the same in that regard?
Phantom Liberty is more along what you want, that story branches nicely. The base game is very linear.
cant imagine that changed, thats an issue beyond one code can fix
Depends. If you mean in gameplay terms, no, there's been some changes. All the perks were reworked, and not only all function correctly, they all have a tangiable effect on your build, and visiting a ripper doc is now a requirement instead of something you do once or twice.
If you mean in level design terms, like are more missions open ended like the Maelstrom one in the beginning? Yeah, it's the pretty much the same. I don't think that'll be addressed in anything other than the DLC tbh.
I've played through it twice after the sale around the release of Edgerunners. Had a great time. I loved the story and I got completely absorbed into the world. I just played after the 2.0 updated and the game seems even more fun now, at least at high level. So yeah, it's good now and it was good a year ago. There's still some bugs every now and then, but most of them are just "charming" bugs like cars getting launched, spawning in wrong places, etc. Taste is personal though, maybe RPG diehards or something might not like it.
Yes, it finally lost Early Access
It always had been good. Itβs even better now
Genuinely delusional.
I don't know about it always being good...Objectively, it launched in a very very rough state, regardless of the platform (my PC is not a cheap rig, still had numerous problems when i played). The recent patch ironed out a lot of the game's problems (tho the level scaling was a step backwards IMO, tho YMMV on that), and yeah, a part of me wants to give props to CDPR for fixing the screwup they themselves made....but I also feel nobody should be giving them props for meeting--and not all the way, mind you--an expectation they themselves set with their own pre release trailers, interviews, and the likes.
Said it before, I'll say it again: they should've just gone the Baldur's Gate 3 route. Because we basically went from Beta, Early Access, to (arguably) the full release of this game in the 3 years it's been out.
I love it now, everything feels punchy because you're not gated around finding new weapons every level. I'm sticking almost exclusively with the iconics that can be upgraded, but as far as I can tell the only difference between generic weapons is the tier they're in, the damage appears to be the same no matter what level you find the weapon at. Some other changes:
I love it now, everything feels punchy because you're not gated around finding new weapons every level
just explain this all in more detail please
So pre 2.0, all the weapons, armor, cyberware, etc. had a level assigned to them in addition to the rarity that determined how big the numbers were, and it forced you to go through your vendor trash each time on the off chance that the numbers were better on any particular weapon you found. Now, every weapon of a particular type has the same parameters depending on rarity tier (white through gold) so if you have a higher tier of the same weapon, it's explicitly, if marginally better, and this keeps you from having to sort through 20-odd weapons every time you go sell, which drastically speeds up the process. Even more so if you stick with the unique iconic weapons, which can be upgraded with materials up to tier 5.
As a side-effect of this, the marginal increases can't boost the legendary item's damage that much higher than the common rarity, so even the most common weapons still deal adequate damage, so enemies aren't spongy like they used to be.
this is the answer i was looking for / hoping for, thank fucking god holy shit. so theres ten levels but the levels arent that different from one another if i understand right
Correct, and you're more likely to get higher rarity tiers as you level.
when was this change implemented!? is this like the combat rebalance mod?
I assume it's all part of 2.0, released last week. If you own CP2077 you have it, it's separate from the DLC.
well have you played befkee then and did it work like that back then?
Hell yeah. In my top ten games. It was good at 1.6 as well, 2.0 adds a whole new stack of cool shit though.
As a netrunner, cyberdeck overclock feels amazing.
Basically once youtr out of RAM for quickhacks, you can spend hp instead, 10 hp for each RAM cost.
So you can play along the knive's edge against a large group of enemies, where one or two more control quickhacks might put you right at deaths door, but give you a chance to heal back before they start shooting at you again.
I'm also a fan of the level scaling. In 1.6 sometimes I would come across early content with a late game character, and just run across them haphazardly 1-shot beheading anyone close to me. It's funny once, but gets boring revisiting old content. Night city should feel dangerous.
what happened 1.6
Curious myself. I played it shortly after launch, and while the atory and the worldbuilding was really great, the gameplay was flawed due to the severe lack of polish.
I concluded back when the DLC was announced that the game deserved a revisit, especially now that I have a proper PC on which to run it, so here I am.
I played it when it first came out and returned it. With update 2.0 and the game on sale, I gave it another go.
Iβm really enjoying the combat. Iβve built a character around Reflex and Cool, so my silenced pistol one shots standard enemies, and my throwing knives can one shot beefier guys so long as theyβre not aware of me. I specced into Reflex for the dodge/air dodge mechanic.
Maybe on harder difficulties, the enemies become bullet sponges, but most targets die before I need to reload.
Might be a bit too early to be the judge of balancing since it has been just a few days. But for now all I can say is it looks promising.