this post was submitted on 22 Jun 2023
329 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22059 readers
28 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 195 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

i'm just glad this whole thing is over. what a sick world we live in where five billionaires in a submarine sparks wall to wall coverage and five hundred migrants lost at sea gets barely a passing mention

[–] The_Terrible_Humbaba 53 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

In my country, they started the newscast 2h earlier than usual just to say "Debris were found; may be unrelated". I think they initially went live earlier because the conference was meant to happen earlier and they couldn't wait to show it; it had to be live. When it got postponed, they spent 2h just talking about it with commentators and different specialists; all just theorizing what could have happened, and whether there might still be a chance for rescue or not, and repeating that there would be a conference "so stay tuned!".

But refugees you barely hear about.

I get this story has some more "thrill" and novelty to it, being a submarine near the titanic and all, but this really is ridiculous.

[–] Thrashy 17 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

The more prosaic explanation -- bordering on "banality of evil," but still -- is that a story about a rickety overloaded fishing boat full of desperate war refugees sinking in the Mediterranean has become a fairly common occurrence in the years since the Arab Spring turned into a decade of civil wars, but whiz-bang private subs going missing while diving on the most famous shipwreck of all time is unusual. Horses vs. zebras and all that.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] maximus@lemmy.sdf.org 40 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I think it's more how uncommon the situation is, the complexity and odds of the rescue, and the 'ticking clock' effect that came from them only having 96 hours of oxygen. Stories need to be interesting to get mass media coverage (look at the Tham Luang cave rescue - none of them were billionares), and, as incredibly bleak as this sentence sounds, a boat capsizing with hundreds onboard just isn't interesting enough.

[–] RedCanasta@lemmy.fmhy.ml 15 points 1 year ago

Yea it's totally not that every major news outlet is owned by and serves the interests of the rich.

load more comments (5 replies)
[–] bobs_monkey@lemm.ee 35 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Definitely shows where the media's priorities lie, ie the wealthy lamenting the loss of their own

[–] jw_@programming.dev 18 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Or where the average person's interest lie? Most people don't click on articles about refugees dying, but do read about this...

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] Dandylion 16 points 1 year ago

4 billionaires and one guys 19 year old kid.

[–] CarbonIceDragon@pawb.social 14 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Were all of them billionaires? I can't imagine the people actually operating the thing were, surely, just the passengers?

[–] Fauxreigner 36 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

The pilot may not have been, although anyone described as an "explorer" is pretty likely to be wealthy. Three of the other four (including the CEO) were, and the last was one of the billionaire's 19 year old son.

Edit: Checked, the pilot (Paul-Henri Nargeolet) was also a billionaire.

[–] acupofcoffee 25 points 1 year ago

The CEO was the pilot.

[–] salarua@sopuli.xyz 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

it was literally just the five of them

[–] KoboldCoterie@pawb.social 39 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Maybe we should send another 150 or so subs, also filled with 5 billionaires each.

[–] xXxOxhamxXx 20 points 1 year ago
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Toxic_Tiger 99 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It sucks that 4 other people were killed by the CEOs own hubris. But at least they don't appear to have suffocated to death. At that depth, it would have been instantaneous.

[–] Fauxreigner 30 points 1 year ago (9 children)

Yeah, that was my concern when we got reports of regular banging noises.

load more comments (9 replies)
[–] patchymoose@rammy.site 80 points 1 year ago (16 children)

The more I have read about this, the more disgusted I am. This company generally, and the CEO personally, took all sorts of shortcuts to build this thing.

The CEO stated that he didn't want to have any ex military submarine experts as part of the team, because they were "uninspiring" and "50 year old white guys", and he'd rather have young college grads who are inspiring. The real reason: the college grads were simply cheaper. He didn't want to pay the ex military experts. That's it.

The CEO lied to CBS news in their CBS Sunday morning report and told them that Boeing and University of Washington consulted with them on the design of the submersible. Both organizations told the NY Post today that they had no involvement with it. So that was a fucking lie. All he did was use the UW lab after hours.

The use of a Logitech PS3 style controller to navigate the vehicle...what the actual fuck.

Because this was a submersible in international waters, there are virtually no regulations. That needs to change. If the UN needs to draft a treaty for countries to ratify to regulate these things in international waters, then that's what needs to happen.

[–] sanols 32 points 1 year ago (7 children)

I don’t see the issue in using a controller, the US Navy does the same

https://www.theverge.com/2018/3/18/17136808/us-navy-uss-colorado-xbox-controller

I do think it’s ironic that they used a Logitech controller instead of an Xbox controller, but the reasoning is probably similar to the US Navy’s

[–] termus 27 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Using a controller is fine, but I'm sure they are hardwired. There is a Today show interview where the CEO specifically said they use them over bluetooth.

Absolutely all shit made up in my brain from my hatred of bluetooth. I could definitely see the controller dying because they forgot to charge it, tried to connect the spare but bluetooth being bluetooth wouldn't. Then they drift into the Titantic, get a puncture and implode.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] patchymoose 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The fact that it's a wireless controller is what I really don't understand. Why would you want to risk interference, battery issues, etc?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Cybrpwca 15 points 1 year ago

The big difference I see is what it's controlling. Sure, the Navy used Xbox controllers for intuitive use of the periscope. I bet if you asked them "please make all ship attitude controls, and therefore crew safety, reliant on this," they would laugh at you and walk away.

[–] FlashMobOfOne 14 points 1 year ago (3 children)

I don’t see the issue in using a controller, the US Navy does the same

I do. I've been an avid PC Gamer my entire adult life and I've never had a Logitech product that wasn't terribly glitchy. When I heard that bit it made me feel like Moss in The IT Crowd.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)
[–] LadyAutumn@lemmy.blahaj.zone 78 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Better that than them surviving all that time slowly dying on the seabed.

[–] Death2lois@lemmy.one 45 points 1 year ago

If it were me or one of my loved ones, aside from rescue, this may be the best outcome.

[–] Adella1961 57 points 1 year ago

I find it incredibly sad that the teen, Sulemon Dawood, only agreed to go on the trip to appease his father. Left on his own, the teen was not interested in going. And although I’m saddened to hear all five perished, the four older adults made their own independent decisions to take the risk. I feel an extra sense of sadness for the teen though who was influenced by his father into going.

https://www.independent.co.uk/news/world/americas/shahzada-suleman-dawood-titanic-sub-imploded-b2362670.html

[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 55 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

https://www.nbcnews.com/news/amp/rcna90336

good thing we put so much effort into saving a billionaire with a deathwish while we let all these poor people die. Good thing so many peasants were more interested in a billionaire's life than our brothers and sisters the billionaires oppress and exploit out of proud, insatiable, sociopathic greed.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] qevlarr 49 points 1 year ago
[–] Valliac 34 points 1 year ago

A sudden implosion is the best-case scenario, given how else it could have gone.

[–] alottachairs 34 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I do feel awful for their families. But I feel more awful for the refugees in the Mediterranean.

[–] takeda 16 points 1 year ago (3 children)

The CEO's wife lost her parents to Titanic and now also her husband.

[–] SilentStorms@lemmy.fmhy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Her parents? Wouldn't that make her more than 110 years old..?

[–] Mishmash2000@lemmy.nz 13 points 1 year ago

It was her great great grandparents

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] nfld0001 33 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I ought to concede I have plenty of disappointment around this. I feel like there were well established means to do this kind of thing safely, and I think because Seagate failed to meet that, five lives were needlessly lost. I wouldn't be surprised if this story lives on for a while as a sort of fable in hubris. That's not even getting to, say, the sense of injustice invoked in comparing how this was handled to the recent shipwreck in the Mediterranean. I think all of those thoughts distill down to the Eat The Rich flavored fan faire, and I think there's already plenty of that here.

Still, the Rich and Foolish nature of this trip all said, I find it commendable that the likes of the US Coast Guard, the Navy, and international groups came together and put up a sizeable and respectable search and rescue effort. I think it would've been well in their right (and in fact realistic) for them to wave it off and say something like "they made the wine, they drink the cup." But they didn't. I can respect that the collective weight of the wallets on board likely played a big part in it to say the least, but I'd also wager that it also takes a mighty large amount of forgiveness in people being foolish to go through that kind of effort to try and save them. Similar can probably be said for rescue missions helping out others in equally foolish incidents.

There's a lot directly and indirectly connected to this disaster that doesn't reflect well on the bulk of society, but the effort to try and help others even if they don't necessarily deserve it? I'll admit it feels naive to say, but I'd rather live in that kind of society than one that errs toward extending a callous hand. I hope we'll hear more often about us extending a hand to those who indeed deserve it, like those in the Mediterranean, but I'm also in the camp of continuing to extend that kind of forgiveness to The Foolish we'll continue to stumble upon. I hope to have the will to do that, at least.

We're all going to be foolish from time to time in life, and I sure know I'd sincerely appreciate a kind hand when it's my turn.

[–] AllonzeeLV@vlemmy.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

We're all going to be foolish from time to time in life, and I sure know I'd sincerely appreciate a kind hand when it's my turn.

It depends on your net worth. I see Americans wish death on homeless people for lowering property values and insisting they did it to themselves. I see Americans telling student loan debtors who committed the crime of buying the lie and improving themselves being laughed at for their struggles.

Meanwhile a wealthy person can go to a fancy rehab for years of acting like a belligerent, intoxicated asshole, be called brave for it, and have their job with massive salary waiting for them after it all.

Second chances (and third, and fourth...) are for capital holders. Poor people half to walk a tightrope from birth and be both lucky and perfect to improve their station, with plenty of people ready to scold them for trying the moment they fall.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Spitfire@pawb.social 28 points 1 year ago

This is incredibly sad but at least it was a quick death.

[–] jast1117@vlemmy.net 28 points 1 year ago

I'm so glad this story is done now. Rich people dying paying huge money for dumb things makes me 😴😴.

Literally couldn't care less...

[–] snrkl@lemmy.sdf.org 24 points 1 year ago

For those wondering about James Cameron's comments, I'd thoroughly recommend watching the Deep Sea Challenger documentary. It is enthralling. I have a friend who actually worked on the sub and went on the expedition with Cameron. In his words: "to underestimate the safety requirements is, put simply, to die."

[–] DSLeMaster 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

With all the red flags I've seen in the 4 days of them looking for it, I cannot understand how anyone spending that kind of money on this didn't see enough to back the fuck off.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] ag_roberston_author 22 points 1 year ago

The hubris of CEO Stockton Rush caused the death of 4 other people.

[–] Mcballs1234@lemmy.ml 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel sorry for thecreww members who were just there to drive the thing, but the rich I could care less and I'm pretty hungry

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Rentlar 15 points 1 year ago

Nice going with the breaking report. At least they went painlessly.

[–] zombiepete 12 points 1 year ago (10 children)

Better that than suffocating to death slowly on the bottom of the ocean. Sympathy for their families.

load more comments (10 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›