this post was submitted on 03 Aug 2023
218 points (100.0% liked)

Fuck Cars

431 readers
1 users here now

This community exists as a sister community/copycat community to the r/fuckcars subreddit.

This community exists for the following reasons:

You can find the Matrix chat room for this community here.

Rules

  1. Be nice to each other. Being aggressive or inflammatory towards other users will get you banned. Name calling or obvious trolling falls under that. Hate cars, hate the system, but not people. While some drivers definitely deserve some hate, most of them didn't choose car-centric life out of free will.

  2. No bigotry or hate. Racism, transphobia, misogyny, ableism, homophobia, chauvinism, fat-shaming, body-shaming, stigmatization of people experiencing homeless or substance users, etc. are not tolerated. Don't use slurs. You can laugh at someone's fragile masculinity without associating it with their body. The correlation between car-culture and body weight is not an excuse for fat-shaming.

  3. Stay on-topic. Submissions should be on-topic to the externalities of car culture in urban development and communities globally. Posting about alternatives to cars and car culture is fine. Don't post literal car fucking.

  4. No traffic violence. Do not post depictions of traffic violence. NSFW or NSFL posts are not allowed. Gawking at crashes is not allowed. Be respectful to people who are a victim of traffic violence or otherwise traumatized by it. News articles about crashes and statistics about traffic violence are allowed. Glorifying traffic violence will get you banned.

  5. No reposts. Before sharing, check if your post isn't a repost. Reposts that add something new are fine. Reposts that are sharing content from somewhere else are fine too.

  6. No misinformation. Masks and vaccines save lives during a pandemic, climate change is real and anthropogenic - and denial of these and other established facts will get you banned. False or highly speculative titles will get your post deleted.

  7. No harassment. Posts that (may) cause harassment, dogpiling or brigading, intentionally or not, will be removed. Please do not post screenshots containing uncensored usernames. Actual harassment, dogpiling or brigading is a bannable offence.

Please report posts and comments that violate our rules.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

The New York Times published a pair of articles this weekend highlighting the rising number of deaths of cyclists riding electric bikes. However, in one of the most impressive feats of victim-blaming I’ve seen from the publication in some time, the NYT lays the onus on e-bikes instead of on the things killing their law abiding riders: cars.

top 25 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] magnetosphere@kbin.social 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

When I’m driving, and a cyclist is “in my way”, I don’t blame the cyclist. I blame the shitty infrastructure. I’d love to ride a bike more often, but the roads and laws are just too hostile.

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 5 points 1 year ago (4 children)

So you don't live in NYC where cyclists ignore red lights, cross walks, stop signs, etc...and just expect you to jump out of their way.

[–] FermatsLastAccount@kbin.social 42 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I live in NY. As a pedestrian, cars are way more annoying than bicycles.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's safer for bikes to ignore those, that's why some states that are smarter about it have legalized the Idaho stop

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Forgot that pedestrians don't matter and bikes should run red lights cause ignoring traffic laws isn't dangerous at all.

[–] jessta@aus.social 19 points 1 year ago (1 children)

@Princeali311 @buckykat bicycles and pedestrians got a long fine for decades before the invention of traffic laws

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 year ago

The first stop sign was literally a PR stunt from a car owner's club

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Ignoring stupid car-centric traffic laws on a bicycle is safe and reasonable.

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Not for pedestrians it isn't. Nor are ebikes driving on sidewalks or going as fast as they do in the bike lane.

[–] buckykat@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yes, for pedestrians too. And the only reason an ebike would be on the sidewalk is if there are too many cars in the road.

[–] Princeali311@lemm.ee 2 points 1 year ago

Lol no. They are all over Williamsburg on Kent when there is no traffic at all.

[–] notenoughbutter@lemmy.ml 8 points 1 year ago

that doesn't show why ebikes are bad, it just shows the rider is bad

[–] zephyreks@lemmy.ca 4 points 1 year ago

Man's gotta avoid getting run over somehow.

[–] Showroom7561@lemmy.ca 31 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Just another perspective here.

Yes, it's cars, and yes, it's infrastructure. However.....

E-bikes have been causing a spike in cyclist crashes, even in places that is considered the safest place to cycle: The Netherlands.

The problem with e-bikes is that they are more like motorcycles and less like bikes, so you get a huge number of people under 25 and people over 55 crashing these things left and right.

This article from The Verge is worth the read to get a better idea of what's going on.

[–] Tessellecta@feddit.nl 9 points 1 year ago

80 yo or 14 yo on ebikes are menaces. One because they don't have the reaction time and coordination to handle the speed. One because they don't have a shred of situational awareness or respect for the rules of the road.

It's honestly scary to share a bike path with both.

[–] pizzaiolo@slrpnk.net 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)
[–] andrewrgross@slrpnk.net 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I feel like the NYTimes is everyone's well meaning out-of-touch neoliberal poly sci professor dad.

Like... they usually get to the right answer, but they're always 3 - 10 years behind.

[–] uriel238@lemmy.blahaj.zone 17 points 1 year ago

Well, they come to the neoliberal answer at any rate. NYT still asserts that privacy and encryption should be sacrificed so the nice law enforcement can take care of us.

[–] autumn 9 points 1 year ago

yeesh. i had seen the first one but not the second. i love the heck out of my e-bike.

[–] rm_dash_r_star@lemm.ee 6 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (4 children)

Not going to read the article so in response to the comment, electric bicycles put people in a strange place in terms of safety. You've got the speeds of a motorcycle without the ability to flow with traffic. In the presence of high density traffic I'd say an e-bike is more dangerous than a motorcycle.

I've been a motorcyclist most of my life and I can say you have to be super vigilant about situational awareness and ready to evade at all times. People driving in cars are not programmed to notice motorcycles. They're always looking for cars and sometimes don't register other hazards. It shouldn't be that way, but nothing is going to change that as long as human beings are driving.

My recommendation to anyone who wants to use an e-bike for regular transportation is just go to a motorcycle, it's going to be much safer in traffic. There's some really nice electric motorcycles now. For e-bike users you have to be extra careful. Drivers don't see bicyclists anyway and you're going a lot faster most of the time. A head injury at 10 mph can be fatal.

[–] MangoPenguin@lemmy.blahaj.zone 15 points 1 year ago

Speeds of a motorcycle?? Most ebikes top out at 28mph. You can go that fast on a normal road bike if you're in shape too.

[–] derpoltergeist@col.social 10 points 1 year ago

@rm_dash_r_star @bumble you're so close to getting the point, it's a bit painful.

[–] nilloc@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 1 year ago

Just getting a motorcycle doesn’t work in NYC. There’s no place to keep that many motorcycles.

Getting a motorcycle license, or taking a rider safety course might help, but changing the e-bike and traffic laws to make room for them (and reduce room for cars) is what’s going to save most lives.

For context I bicycle commuted in Boston for 18 years, motorcycled in the country for a bit, and restore classic cars for a semi-living now. I watched smartphones make it riskier and riskier to ride in traffic, then saw the pandemic magnify the issue, and largely avoid doing it at this point.

[–] moral_imperative 3 points 1 year ago

You're so close, bud.

Most ebikes have a top speed of 20mph and weigh less than a motorcycle (and MUCH LESS than a car,) so your first paragraph is BS.

2nd paragraph - right on. It's almost like cars are big heavy death machines that are dangerous, even FATAL, at high speeds.

Motorcycles cost more, are heavier, and move much faster than ebikes. They're absolutely more dangerous than an ebike.

Give ebikes their own infrastructure and do urban planning that reduces the speed and danger levels of large, fast-moving vehicles.