Seems like a good start, but I wonder why it doesn't include judicial.
this post was submitted on 20 Jul 2023
82 points (100.0% liked)
U.S. News
2244 readers
1 users here now
News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.
Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Post the original source of information as the link.
- If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
- Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
- Social media is not a news source.
For World News, see the News community.
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
Don't worry it has 0 chance of passing.
It could, because the requirements will be laughable. This is just a way for them to obfuscate their investment via a third party while virtue signaling.
It's also a way for them to finger point during election season.
Finger pointing! That is definitely something a politician excels at.
"They aren't my stocks, they're my wife's/husband's/daughter's/son's" - every politician
"my wealth manager does all that stuff, sure we have a weekly golf game together, but that doesn't affect the trades he makes"
Something like this requires a constitution amendment...