this post was submitted on 17 Jul 2023
42 points (100.0% liked)

Food and Cooking

6446 readers
1 users here now

All things culinary and cooking related. Share food! Share recipes! Share stuff about food, etc.

Subcommunity of Humanities.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] minishoemaze 25 points 1 year ago (4 children)

"These products are garbage," he says. "We are not used to them, they are not part of the Mediterranean diet. And they could be a threat for people: we don't know what eating insects can do to our bodies.

As opposed to red meat, which we know causes health issues in large quantities...

People are afraid of change, I get it. The thought of eating bugs weirds me out too, but do it for a month or so and I'm sure it's fine.

[–] sirdorius@programming.dev 10 points 1 year ago

The famous Mediterranean diet did not include the ridiculous amount of meat and animal products that are so common today.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 23 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I really don't get what the fuss over eating insects is all about, especially if they're ground into a fine powder. It's just another dead animal to eat.

[–] bbbhltz 20 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

I don't know where you live, but here in France all the conspiracy theory folks have got the idea into their heads that they are already sneaking insects into our food. It is all part of the larger conspiracy theory that the government and the elite are going to impose a meat allowance, which will make the lower classes weaker and more prone to disease and blah blah blah. I don't know any more


my MIL is in deep though, she is a bit of an ultra-conservative type who thinks vaccines make you magnetic.

Moving on...

There is one minor issue, and that is that some people who are allergic to shellfish can have allergies to some insects.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Any deviation from the current norm inevitably ends up in conspiracy theories, most likely because it’s one of the most effective ways to avoid or delay change - aka enable the billionaire class to make as much money as long as possible.

Think about 15 minute cities, eating insects, covid vaccinations, eating soy, trans people existing, …

A lot of people are fundamentally afraid of change (or, more accurately, want everything to just remain normal), which the capital class gladly abuses to further their own interests.

[–] bbbhltz 8 points 1 year ago

Think about 15 minute cities, eating insects, covid vaccinations, eating soy, trans people existing, …

My MIL is "anti" all of those things, as well as anti-EV. She also believed for a week or so that the situation in Ukraine was a hoax.

A lot of people are fundamentally afraid of change

For real. I ate insects for the first time many years ago when Ynsect launched. A wonderfully crunchy snack. They gave me the whole 1kg bag because I was the only person who tried them.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 1 year ago (1 children)

People are afraid of what they don't understand. It's a tale as old as time

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (2 replies)
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 20 points 1 year ago (2 children)

It’s bonkers to me that people who eat “normal” meat are so opposed to eating insects. Without exception, it basically comes down to not wanting to try new things, which is often tied to conservatism and being scared of change in general.

It shouldn’t be surprising that the politicians fighting this are right wingers who are against this on a cultural level - aka being afraid of change.

[–] hot_milky@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

It's simply disgusting, it's not political, it's gag inducing.

[–] angstylittlecatboy@reddthat.com 26 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Disgust at eating bugs isn't political, but it's cultural. It's far from universal.

[–] hot_milky@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I grew up eating seafood but I still hate dealing with it if I have to remove shells and clean it. Telling people to suck it up and eat something they don't want to eat makes no sense to me.

[–] photonic_sorcerer@lemmy.dbzer0.com 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Nobody is being forced to eat anything. The point is that people have an irrational revultion at the thought of eating insects.

[–] 404CameranotFound@lemmy.fmhy.ml 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Because insects are disgusting pests.

Most crustaceans are the same. Disgusting water bugs.

Well, that's just like, your opinion, man.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] prole 21 points 1 year ago (5 children)

Do you like lobster or shrimp? They're basically bugs.

[–] HanlonsButterknife 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I like crab, bit I can't stand soft shell crab. It's a mouthfeel thing, and I expect a lot of insect food preparations are similar

[–] prole 8 points 1 year ago (1 children)

No, insects are ground into a powder and essentially used like flour. You probably wouldn't even know you're eating it if someone didn't tell you. No mouth feel to speak of.

[–] HanlonsButterknife 2 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Yeah in some cases. In others they are served whole, like fried crickets, beetles, etc.

load more comments (1 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 13 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Like I said

Without exception, it basically comes down to not wanting to try new things

Nothing about it is inherently icky. You’re just not used to the idea and therefore don’t want to try it.

Also, you’ve most likely consumed insects before, because they are also used in food colouring.

[–] TheOakTree 9 points 1 year ago

I'm not necessarily accustomed to eating insects... but even the packaged/processed foods we have today are allowed to be a certain percentage of hair/bug/mouse-poop so that it doesn't become impossible to produce legal food :)

[–] hot_milky@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 year ago

I have tried it for the novelty but I see no reason to make it part of my diet. It is disgusting to me and getting used to it would take a lot of time and suffering, for what reason? I've been a vegetarian before, I'd rather eat peas than insects.

[–] black_mouflon 12 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Also other than the inherent disgust to bug there is also the fact that since bugs are so small animals they can't be cleaned and separeted to different parts of the animal. This means that part of what you eat is the intestines of the animal with all the fecal matter in it.

I simply don't want shit (or processed shit) in my food. Is that too big of an ask?

[–] butterypowered@feddit.uk 10 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Like a lot of seafood then.

load more comments (6 replies)
[–] ericjmorey 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The industrial beef slaughterhouses don't exactly have a pristine track record of keeping shit out of the market either.

[–] black_mouflon 2 points 1 year ago

Still by the nature o these animals being bigger it is practicality easier to separate the different parts. With everithing else being equal. No matter how bad it is, it is going to be less than 100% of the initial shit ammount unlike with the bugs wich I'll imagine are being crushed whole.

load more comments (2 replies)
[–] brain_pan@infosec.pub 2 points 1 year ago

for you and me perhaps, not all feel the same

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] glad_cat@lemmy.sdf.org 2 points 1 year ago (3 children)

Would you eat cat, dog, or horse meat?

[–] tycho@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The only reason you don't eat those meats is because you are not used to it. People ate horse meat in Europe regularly until WW2 and cats and dogs are eaten in other part of the world.

Cats and dogs are no more intelligent than cows but we have emotional attachment and historical use (herding and killing rats) for them so in the Western world we prefer to have them as pets.

[–] hot_milky@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 year ago

Horse meat is not rare here in Sweden. Nor is moose or reindeer.

[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 3 points 1 year ago

If it tastes nice, sure.

[–] hot_milky@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 year ago

I eat horse. I would not eat cat or dog because I've don't see them as food but I'm still more disgusted by insect meat.

[–] forestG 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

For most people, eating bugs is only natural.

So, while we globally enjoy this heat wave, most of us hoping for lower temperatures. While some discuss the political aspect of this, which really is large, already established, economic interests resisting alternatives. I am just going to quote something near the end of the article.

Insect farming is arguably much more efficient than cattle production. One hundred pounds (45 kilograms) of feed produces 10 pounds (4.5 kilograms) of beef, while the same amount of feed yields 45 pounds (20 kilograms) of cricket.

I find the thought of eating insects disgusting.

That said, I think outlawing or opposing it is so absurd it's ridiculous. Just like banning lab meat.

Don't want to eat it? Then don't. But why should you force that choice on others? I suspect this is nothing more than political shenanigans in most cases, just another topic with an easy gut answer to stir up the masses over nothing at all.

[–] worfamerryman 11 points 1 year ago (2 children)

A lot of people argue over whether they would want to or not want to eat crickets and defend their decision. But if someone doesn't want to eat crickets, they do not need to defend themselves. Not wanting to is good enough.

People who say we should eat crickets should start eating animals brains, eyes, testicles, and intestines if they really want to push this on people.

[–] plactagonic 8 points 1 year ago

You know, I eat most of these things but I wouldn't say that everyone should eat it. At least try it once to make their opinion on it.

Lots of people don't like the consistency and legs but when ground nobody recognise it.

[–] TheBurlapBandit 4 points 1 year ago

Brains, eyes, testicles, and intestines are delicious. Head to the Southern US and get you a good plate of chitterlings.

[–] EponymousBosh 8 points 1 year ago

Intellectually, I know there's nothing wrong with eating insects, they're just another animal protein source, but I can't get past the "ick" factor.

[–] r1veRRR@feddit.de 7 points 1 year ago (6 children)

Obligatory to each their own, etc. etc.

That being said I'm not sure who these insect burgers are for, or what problem they solve. If you acknowledge that diet is big part of climate change solutions, then why not go directly to plant-based burgers? It's not like crickets have anything in common with red meat in any way.

My cynical take is that it's just a way to "do the right thing" without agreeing with the vegans. Gotta eat dead animals.

[–] Manticore 13 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

I think that's a bad faith interpretation to imply that one eats animals exclusively because it being 'animals' is the point. Most people don't think about it, their priority is making their daily life as simple as possible. They just eat whatever tastes good and is easy to get. And the people pushing for eating insects are thinking about it; they just have different priorities; they're trying to make environmentally-sustainable food easier to get.

Insects are still a far better choice for protein. They don't take remotely the amount of land or water that soy crops do, and they can be grown in areas of the world that don't have as much freshwater. They can be fed off scraps and organic material that are waste to us. They also have a high return yield; they're not being lost to droughts/weather/pests at the rate crops (especially organic) are. I'd posit that an insect-inclusive diet is probably more environmentally-friendly than the modern vegan diet is.

Humans are evolved omnivores. It's both possible and noble to have an organic and herbivorous diet that meets your basic needs, but it's difficult, often inaccessible, expensive; and it takes up huge amounts of land to grow the kind of crops needed (especially if much of them are lost to pests). Soy demands a lot of water, and avocados have been priced out of reach of the impoverished Central Americans they used to cheaply feed. Whether plant or animal, we are only alive by consuming life. There is no diet without some harm to somebody somewhere. Most vegan diets are too expensive (or unavailable), and are part of the deforestation for soy plantations overseas.

Ultimately now that principles have become a part of how we consume (and not just necessity, availability, effort etc), any philosophy requires compromise. If one's primary concern is freshwater, the carbon cycle, deforestation for cropland, nutrition density, local food-chain, animal suffrage, animal consent, organic, local-grown, seasonal, etc... It's not possible to follow them all, and it's not reasonable to expect everybody choose a single specific one.

I have a preference towards attainable and environmentally-sustainable eating, which means that eating crickets (and mushrooms, yum) is less harmful ecologically than eating soy (deforestation, water), and far less harmful than cattle (magnitudes worse than any other livestock). I also avoid palm oil products (deforestation). I don't disagree with any vegetarians or vegans who chose other principles; it's excellent that humans are becoming increasingly mindful of what we choose to eat. We just have different priorities.

[–] averyminya 3 points 1 year ago

Insects are also cheaper than plants.

Plant-based food alternatives, at least in the U.S. are very expensive to the counterparts.

Poor people make up a majority of America. If we want change, we need feasible alternatives, not greenwashed ones that price out at the middle class. Impoverished people aren't capable of making the same extent of changes sheerly because their survival is more important than not using cow milk.

I'm totally with you, we need to make efforts at culturally appropriate changes and to make efforts towards diversifying all of them. More options is only a good thing and I'll never understand this idea that it has to be specifically one thing (usually some kind of plant based). If it can be made cheap enough, great, but don't we also want lab grown, insect based, and locally farmed meat and produce? Let's try and make strides towards making all of these as prevalent as factory farming, no?

[–] SlamDrag 4 points 1 year ago

Crickets are more sustainable than plants as a source of protein.

load more comments (4 replies)
[–] randomname01@feddit.nl 6 points 1 year ago

I don’t understand how someone could be fine with eating “traditional” meat but be opposed to eating insects. The only reason

[–] Tordoc 6 points 1 year ago

I've eaten and cooked with cricket flour! It's honestly no different than most powdered protein supplements, and has a mild nutty taste that is unnoticeable or pleasant. As the article mentions, it's great in pancakes and pastas! I expect that as climates and food availability changes, many more people will be including alternate protein sources in their foods!

[–] wnose@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago

I had deep fried grasshoppers in Mexico. Just imagine eating a handful of popcorn with some peanuts. Same texture, more or less same taste. I did finish the plate and did not gag at all. I would't go out of my way to order it, but I wouldn't say no if it was offered again.

On the same trip, I tried a live beetle and OMG, it was disgusting beyond belief. Just think some awful chemical taste. Unfortunately that's the reality for some desperately poor people in less developed nations.

[–] u202307011927@feddit.de 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

(offtopic: whoa beehaw is federating with us again?)

load more comments (2 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›