this post was submitted on 26 Mar 2025
12 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10308 readers
16 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Substack came under substantial pressure in 2023 for hosting paid newsletters that promoted Nazi ideology and symbols. The company dithered in response to complaints, fueling questions about its values. And in 2019, the company received a major investment geared at attracting journalists with audiences from venture capital firm Andreessen Horowitz — whose head Marc Andreessen is a major Musk ally, recruiting staff for his DOGE efforts.

Substack's Role in the Network State

The company is also a major tentpole in a parallel establishment envisioned by Andressen and other promoters of the Network State movement, which specifically aims to dismantle the United States and replace it with a federation of smaller, competing fiefdoms. At the inaugural Network State conference in Amsterdam, in October 2023, the movement's leader Balaji Srinavasan said (with edits for clarity):

I'm gonna introduce a new concept today, which is the parallel establishment. Each of them replacing a different legacy institution. So for example, at the top there's San Francisco and we're replacing San Francisco with things outside it like Cul-de-Sac in Arizona and Prospera in South America and Cabin, which is in Texas, but also around the world.

We're gonna take out Harvard, and we have parallel education that's Replit, that Synthesis, which is K through 12, but it's also AI tutoring, the Thiel Fellowship, Emergent Ventures. We replace media with parallel media. It's Twitter and X, it's Substack. This concept of the parallel establishment, if you take up all of these new institutional replacements on the right hand side together, that's a parallel establishment.

They exist alongside, the legacy and parallel. They're gaining strength. They're pulling away users until they become the new thing. So this is how we turn that seemingly impossible thing of building a new country, break into a bunch of individual startups and then aggregate them together.

Srinavasan's statement makes clear that Substack is seen as part of a networked effort to replace, rather than augment, legacy media. And it is precisely Substack's strong network effects which are fueling its growth. Substack simplifies the relationship between publisher and reader while also making it easy for creators to amplify and reference other creators on Substack, while simultaneously imposing friction for sources on the open web. Substack's goal is to win. (Readers may be aware of Peter Thiel's book Zero to One, co-authored with Blake Masters, which discusses the power of network effects to achieve effective monopoly control.)

top 6 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Powderhorn 8 points 4 days ago (1 children)

The idea of not relying on the continuing benevolence of a single corporation is gaining traction, but not widely. One needn't look further than the size of the userbase of Lemmy vs Reddit.

Most people just want a centralized place to log into and get everything they want, which is antithetical to the premise of the internet. It's like a return to AOL, CompuServe and Prodigy.

Given all the conditioning by sites like Facebook, many are unaware that this wasn't always the case. There's a reason tabbed browsing is a thing. But seeking out information on your own takes work, and here we run into the 90/9/1 rule regarding engagement.

There are plenty of talented writers on Substack. I'll admit I don't even bother seeking them out.

But as I learned from my first divorce, you don't own your own data on any site you're not hosting. My ex removed me as a friend, which makes sense. But with that came the removal of all posts about her on my own timeline, which suddenly didn't make any sense but was rather a disjointed set of disparate posts with no throughline.

While Substack is still functioning as sold, it's imperative to keep backups of everything you do. Two papers I used to work for closed up shop, and I'd not done so. Years of my work are just gone because one rich guy in Canada decided to shut down those sites. The same can happen here at any time.

[–] jarfil 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (1 children)

Two papers I used to work for closed up shop, and I'd not done so.

Try the wayback machine, but put the URL with "http" instead of "https". I've recently found a page of mine they archived in the early 2000s, with data from as far back as 1997.

[–] Powderhorn 2 points 4 days ago

I was a columnist at one, but I wouldn't even know where to start looking, given this was over 20 years ago. I was just an editor at the more recent one, so nothing to dig up short of an explainer about bitcoin.

[–] hitmyspot@aussie.zone 3 points 4 days ago

I think the rise of a platform like substance is a good thing. It does provide a way to monetize independent voices. The rise of Ghost is a direct descendent of that. It's a shame that we are all so easily corralled, with 'friction' to other sites being such a problem. I fully expect substance to enshittify as per Cory Doctows original meaning. I just hope that enough alternatives are in place that this becomes swifter migration each time.

I think open source web, with independent media is actually starting to take off, and be taken seriously. Legacy media is broken and long form reads are gone. It's 24 hour news cycle speculation and constant breaking news instead.

[–] alykanas@slrpnk.net 2 points 4 days ago (1 children)

That is a fucking tremendous head.

[–] melp 3 points 4 days ago

Yea. That shape...