this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
40 points (100.0% liked)

Asklemmy

1464 readers
49 users here now

A loosely moderated place to ask open-ended questions

Search asklemmy πŸ”

If your post meets the following criteria, it's welcome here!

  1. Open-ended question
  2. Not offensive: at this point, we do not have the bandwidth to moderate overtly political discussions. Assume best intent and be excellent to each other.
  3. Not regarding using or support for Lemmy: context, see the list of support communities and tools for finding communities below
  4. Not ad nauseam inducing: please make sure it is a question that would be new to most members
  5. An actual topic of discussion

Looking for support?

Looking for a community?

~Icon~ ~by~ ~@Double_A@discuss.tchncs.de~

founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 64 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Make a drain hole at the bottom of a lake, that comes out above it. Put in a water wheel, free energy.

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 22 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Never thought about it before, but I guess this makes portal guns impossible, since scenarios like this break conservation of energy.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 11 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

Well, the videogame kind are definitely impossible, but if the gravitational field could travel through the portal then it would probably still conserve energy. The gravitational interactions around vertical portals would be exceptionally weird. If they were close enough, you'd probably experience weightlessness while in between them, but I can't wrap my head around what would happen as they move further apart. That makes me hope someone tries to make a mod that models that in Portal...

[–] Daedskin@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago (1 children)

My first instinct would be that it would equivalent to putting another celestial body the mass of the earth at the distance from the earth is from each portal. Since gravity is a wave, it, in theory, would affect a region beyond what would considered "around" the portals.

So if you put one portal on the ground, and another 100 meters up, it would be similar to there being a second earth 100 meters from the surface of the earth, experienced by the entire earth (once the gravitational wave propagated.) How that would evolve over time is too complex for my basic understanding of physics, but a simulation of it would be a neat experiment.

[–] balsoft@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Hm, I don't think the "gravitational force" (as in the thing that pulls you towards the Earth) is a result of a gravitational wave; rather it is a result of you being in a static vector field. Gravitational waves are waves that travel through that field, e.g. the stuff that LIGO is measuring.

I've tried thinking about how it would work with portals. The problem is that the definition for gravitational field is g = -βˆ‡Ξ¦ where gravitational potential Ξ¦(x) = βˆ‘~i~(-GΒ·m~i~)/||x - x~i~||, which depends on there being a single unambiguous "distance between two points" (x and x~i~ in this case). But think about two points on the opposite sides of one "portal entrance" (e.g. imagine a portal entrance on a wall in front of you, with your friend on the other side of that wall). What is the distance between you and your friend now? If we're to say it's the same as it was without a portal, then (1) we get straight back to our problems with energy conservation, (2) there is no physical path between you and your friend that matches this distance as there's a rift in space on that path. It would also be weird to conclude that it's infinity - you can just go around the wall in our example and be right next to your friend. So we almost have to conclude that the shortest path would have to go around the portal somehow. Let's just say that it would be the length of the shortest path around the portal. By the formulae for the gravitational field, this means that the gravity will pull you towards the shortest path to Earth's center. If you placed one portal on the surface of Earth (let's assume that the center of Earth is sufficiently far away that the gravitational field can be approximated as uniform in direction and magnitude) and another one somewhere far-far away in deep space (where let's say that gravitational field is 0 for simplicity) it would look something like this:

Note how while the gravitational potential (Ξ¦) is defined along the red line, the gravitational field would be undefined as there would be no gradient in the gravitational potential.

Now let's try thinking what would happen on the other side. I'll assume that our portals are just flattened wormholes with short throats. Thus we'll just assume that portal entrances are actually "two-sided" (e.g. if they are just floating in your room, you can walk around them and see whatever is around the other portal at all times), and that the distance between them is 0 (let's not think about how that works for now). Now the distance between an object on "one side" of first portal entrance and "the other side" of another portal entrance is even more messed up - I think the shortest path would technically be one that travels from first object to one of the "edges" of the first portal entrance and then from the corresponding edge of the second portal entrance to the second object. Thus the gravitational field around the other portal would look like this (I've added eyes to clarify how I've linked up portal sides):

The red line once again means that the gravitational field there is undefined.

Whew, it's complicated, right?

Now, let's put the second portal close to the first one. Note that I'm assuming here that only the shortest distance to the center of the earth matters.

The two red lines from before now overlap, and there's another one - there's no gradient when the distance to the blue portal and to the earth is the same. It'd actually be longer than what I've drawn, and some sort of parabola in those areas, but I'm too lazy to do that. Hanging in the middle of that red cross would be a weird feeling - your top half would feel as though you're hanging upside down, while your bottom half would feel normal, and your arms and legs would be pulled in slightly different directions.

Although, I think that Newtonian definitions of gravity are playing tricks on us here. We should probably try using general relativity instead, but I am too tired to even attempt that right now, and I'd probably fail given that the fields involved there are a lot more complicated.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 10 points 1 month ago (1 children)

But you know it’s possible from firsthand experience. Whomsth’n’t reached terminal velocity by shooting the ceiling & floor and jumping in?

[–] dessalines@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)
[–] SoulWager@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Maybe entering the portal takes as much energy as it would take to climb the long way? If the other end is on the moon you have to enter at 10km/s or something else you fall right back out. Warning: I am not responsible for damage caused by extreme tidal forces.

[–] CanadaPlus@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago) (1 children)

The trick would be finding the tallest vertical line of sight you can. Just making portable plates and flying one would be hard to beat, but failing that maybe a mineshaft.

Does it fire through water in the game?

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] CaptainBasculin@lemmy.ml 56 points 1 month ago (3 children)
[–] TheOakTree@lemm.ee 7 points 1 month ago

I mean, genuinely, this would be infinite energy. I was thinking of somehow using magnets and induction to generate power, but it would be excessively high frequency and would be antithetical to multi-phase power.

[–] pr06lefs@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 month ago

that looks just like me lol

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

Part of me is thinking: "But doesn't the water slow down each time it comes into contact with the cog?"

And the answer is the yes, but the answer is also, "it begins to accelerate again right after it falls off the cog."

And yet it's still fucking with me, and somehow I'm imagining water getting slower and slower and less energetic each time, as if gravity itself is being weakened

[–] CrimeDad@lemmy.crimedad.work 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Take advantage of the free energy and build a power plant around it.

[–] GreyEyedGhost@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 month ago

"You're given a money printing machine. What do you do?" "Uh, print some really cool art?"

[–] HipsterTenZero@dormi.zone 12 points 1 month ago

fuck it up and waste the first shot on a non-portal supporting surface

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Like, I can only shoot two portals ever? Single-use would imply only being able to shoot one portal, but that doesn't seem very useful.

Also wasn't portal travel hella toxic? To the point that it killed Cave Johnson? I sure as hell won't be using it to save time on my commute or anything.

I think I'd have to use it for violence, like sending a war criminal off a large building, but you couldn't even really have fun with it. Everyone fantasizes about launching a billionaire straight into space, but you'd need multiple portals to get them into a situation where they're building momentum first.

Also, if there's no material emancipation grids, are the portals just there forever? The portal gun doesn't have an off switch or a way to deactivate existing portals.

[–] gratux@lemmy.blahaj.zone 25 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Portal travel isn't toxic. However, ground up moon rocks, which are an almost perfect portal conductor, are very bad for you.

[–] Wahots@pawb.social 6 points 1 month ago

The dust is actually really sharp irl, afaik. It never has been ground down by weather or wind. So it actually is terrible for equipment and people, lol.

[–] altima_neo@lemmy.zip 12 points 1 month ago

I didn't think it was portal travel that killed him, it was breathing in the moon dust

[–] deadbeef79000@lemmy.nz 10 points 1 month ago

Put the other portal in a geostationary space station: free access to orbit.

The single most (energy) expensive thing humans do is put things in orbit.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (3 children)

Best use would be to get two steel plates or something, of apropriate dimensions for portals and shoot them there. Now I have two portals I can move as I please and where I please

[–] do_not_pm_me@thelemmy.club 5 points 1 month ago (3 children)

In the game if a wall moved the portal would evaporate.

[–] SteposVenzny 4 points 1 month ago

Except that one room.

[–] illi@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

Well then I fucked up I guess :D don't remember this detail

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago

In the Valve-developed Sixense Razer Hydra expansion, you could smoothly glide a portal along a wall. Not sure if that makes much of a difference.

[–] Devanismyname@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Smartest answer by far.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

How thick are the plates? Are they bendable? What happens if you bend one of the portals? What happens if an object goes through a bent portal?

o_O

[–] illi@lemm.ee 2 points 1 month ago

I imagined it being thick enoug to not bend easily. But I guess if it could, either the portal would somehow prevent it or expire

[–] Tolookah@discuss.tchncs.de 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would think about buying a house out in the middle of nowhere and link up a closet with one in my house. Free extra square feet in my house.

Realistically, I'd link up my house with a family member's house that we need to fly to.

[–] Albbi@lemmy.ca 13 points 1 month ago

Your houses would become an extremely valuable trade route.

[–] apotheotic 6 points 1 month ago

Upon receiving it I would spend the first god knows how many hours trying to convince myself not to use it for sex things.

Beyond that, I think I'd definitely have to consider permanently renting a storage room in a country I want to visit often, and storing a portal in there.

[–] HiddenLayer555@lemmy.ml 6 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Reverse engineer it

[–] potentiallynotfelix@lemmy.fish 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I would contact NASA and tell them to launch a robot to mars that can shoot it. I'd shoot it at the ground, then put it on the robot, then have a portal to mars.

[–] djsoren19@lemmy.blahaj.zone 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

I'm wondering if the people suggesting it for planetary travel have played Portal 2. It uh...it doesn't end too well when they try.

[–] SageMountain 4 points 1 month ago

Just put a door on it

[–] Ghost33313 6 points 1 month ago

Assuming there is only one, sell my single use for ludicrous amounts of money to some Corp that has merchandise to move.

[–] PatheticGroundThing 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Put portals on two boards. See what happens if I put one board through the other portal.

[–] Nicadimos@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago
[–] ashenone@lemmy.ml 4 points 1 month ago

I would put one portal on a pneumatically actuated plate above a dais that holds an object, and the other portal on a plate placed at a 45 degree angle. I would then see if an object on the dais would fly or fall out of the 45 degree portal, if the other portal actuated and closed the distance between its starting point and the dais.

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 4 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Create infinite energy machine

[–] tetris11@lemmy.ml 1 points 1 month ago

This is the correct answer given time and thought, but nah, would rather pee from my bed

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 4 points 1 month ago

Shoot the portal on two moveable plates. Move the plates as needed to ship goods. For instance, I imagine making a lot of money shoving sea ice into a portal exiting Lake Powell.

[–] AceFuzzLord@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

It would be a bad use of it, but probably pick a random road online and pick a random volcano. Whoever gets unlucky and doesn't notice the nightmare portal in the ground gets a free trip to the base of a volcano at no cost. Would obviously need the portal to be in a location where you cannot just easily return from, though. Gonna turn a random volcano and random street into quite the tourist attraction for no reason.

[–] communism@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago

Save it. I don't have anything currently that I would want to use a portal gun on given that I can only use it once. I might use it to get myself out of a sticky situation, or wait to see if I ever move into a relatively permanent home and I could make a portal from my house to another location for convenience.

[–] BmeBenji@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

The good answer is to create some kind of perpetual motion machine.

The cool answer is to create some kind of roller coaster that just keeps going and going

The fun answer is to create some chaos. Put one behind a door or something and the other in some unexpected place.

[–] folaht@lemmy.ml 3 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Read the instructions.
Sell it to a space agency that promises it to use it as a wormhole.

It needs to be aimed at our moon (Selene) and an exo-dwarf planet.

[–] mrodri89@lemmy.zip 3 points 1 month ago

Take a portal to a black hole, keep the portal open for funsies.

[–] sharkfucker420@lemmy.ml 2 points 1 month ago

Open a portal to the moon at the bottom of the ocean

[–] BCsven@lemmy.ca 2 points 1 month ago

Nobody went with sending trump and musk to mars?

load more comments
view more: next β€Ί