this post was submitted on 19 Nov 2024
237 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

789 readers
41 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

Chat rooms

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 50 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 hours ago

"Normies"? We don't need more tribalism.

[–] underwire212@lemm.ee 18 points 18 hours ago* (last edited 18 hours ago)

“My prehistoric brain can only think in ‘binary’ and doesn’t understand that development of a successful threat model doesn’t (and often can’t) be perfect, but any incremental change to my behavior and online practices in a way to prevent sensitive information from being shared and potentially utilized by malicious actors is a plus.

Instead of thinking about all of that, I’m going to reduce the whole subject to a nice and neat logical fallacy of ‘online privacy is terrible nowadays, thus it doesn’t matter what I do’ “

[–] drwho 9 points 17 hours ago

They genuinely do not care anymore. We lost, just like the cypherpunks lost.

[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 35 points 22 hours ago (2 children)

There’s worse.

They already know everything about me anyways. If I can exchange my data for some free and easy to use service, I’m more than happy to give.

I hate defeatism.

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 1 points 5 hours ago

I don't, in general make this same bargain, and I'm not more than happy to give my data, and thus sacrifice my privacy. However, I have had to reckon, and I think many of those who value privacy must too, with the fact that it isn't inherently valued by everyone, that simply adequately communicating this in a way that's better understood won't translate to people suddenly realising what they're giving up. We aren't always simply one great analogy away from changing every person's world view and likely many have come to their view from a place at least as well informed as those of us who jealously guard our privacy. I also have to reckon with the fact that to some extent, my own desire to protect my privacy is at least not fully explainable by logic and rationalism, especially in light of how difficult it is to protect and how easy it is to have unwittingly ceded it. You might call that defeatism, and to simply conclude "well I lost some privacy, so I might as well give it up completely" is accepting defeat, again not something I'm yet prepared to do, but it is also perhaps important to acknowledge and factor present realities in to one's thinking. It might sound defeatist to point out an enemy's big guns pointed toward you from all sides, but it's insane to ignore them. That quote that you've produced, while antithetical to my thinking, really isn't irrational or illogical, and only defeatist if you were onboard with fighting to begin with. If you do not value your privacy and you get something useful in exchange for its sacrifice then it would seem obvious to part with it gladly and it's difficult to offer a rational reason why someone shouldn't. My strongest motivation for protecting it is more idealistic than personal and has more to do with a kind of slippery slope argument and a concern for hypothetical power grabbing and eroding of our rights and autonomy. I like to think that's reason enough, but at least right now, for almost everyone, none of those concerns represent clear nor present dangers and I can't prove it definitely will become such in future though I certainly feel like it has accelerated trends firmly in the direction of my fears.

[–] Tangentism@lemmy.ml 20 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

Its not even defeatism, its willingly sacrificing themselves to the machine in hopes it will be merciful!

[–] Badland9085@lemm.ee 5 points 20 hours ago

True.

And they’ll follow that up with a somewhat snarky comment that “You’ll be eliminated by the machines first.”

[–] AAA@feddit.org 31 points 23 hours ago (2 children)

The claim to have "nothing to hide" was not just born our of ignorance, but also out of comfort - to not having to do anything about it.

Now that even the last one accepted that they do indeed have something to hide, but in order to justify their own inaction, it's labeled as inevitable: privacy is not real.

They are lying to themselves, because doing otherwise would mean they have to admit being wrong.

[–] Manalith@midwest.social 9 points 20 hours ago

The 'nothing to hide' argument seems a lot like that 'first they came for socialists and I did not speak out, because I was not a socialist...' quote. Sure you have nothing to hide right now, but what happens when something you weren't hiding becomes a target.

[–] legionguy@lemmy.ml 1 points 18 hours ago

i think its a propganda to destroy privacy like the one "police are public protector" only the high ups and they know what police means but the general public dont .

[–] schnurrito@discuss.tchncs.de 56 points 1 day ago (4 children)

but it was trash at loading html websites

as opposed to websites written in excel 2003 format or what

[–] Alice 24 points 1 day ago

Bro's from the timeline where Flash became the dominant species.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] NaNin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 27 points 1 day ago (2 children)

A lot of people have just accepted surviellance for convienience.

People close to me get TSA precheck even though it requires fingerprinting, because "the government already has your fingerprints"

But if they did, why would they need to ask your for them?

[–] octochamp@lemmy.ml 8 points 22 hours ago (1 children)

Sorry for devil's advocate here because I agree with you but hypothetically the answer would be verification. ie., Google already has your password, so why would they need to ask you for it when you log in?

[–] SocialMediaRefugee@lemmy.ml 1 points 6 hours ago

Technically they only have your password hash

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] kekmacska@lemmy.zip 13 points 21 hours ago

"i don't have anything to hide" mfs when their passwords get leaked:

[–] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 43 points 1 day ago

html websites

These aren't normies. They're children.

[–] stationary_melon@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

"If people say edge is bad they should consider thinking about your windows 11 os lol"

[–] Mojeek@lemmy.ml 21 points 1 day ago

"hello i am u/NotBillGates and I agree with this message"

[–] scytale@lemm.ee 44 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

When they realized they DO actually have something to hide, they moved the goalposts to now say nothing is private online anyway.

[–] KomfortablesKissen@discuss.tchncs.de 16 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I mean, that is pretty close to the truth. Especially for people whose skill level is at "Firefox sucks at loading HTML sites".

[–] Oestradiolo@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 1 day ago

That’s such a weird statement. People who don’t like Firefox at that level don’t know what html is.

[–] LinyosT@sopuli.xyz 30 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Is it me or do those comments feel very shill-like?

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 19 points 1 day ago

Yes some subreddit is piviting hard captalism recently, giving up their dignity to defend corporations with their life.

[–] SorteKanin@feddit.dk 3 points 21 hours ago

Yea this has really big astroturfing vibes.

[–] Imprint9816@lemmy.dbzer0.com 90 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

The mindset about privacy is just all wrong. It's not an all or nothing game. Any privacy gain is a net positive to no privacy at all.

To many people conflate privacy with anonymity or try "accomplish" privacy without understanding what they want to be private from and why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Ilandar@aussie.zone 39 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Elon Musk popularised this cope argument a few years ago. It sounds intelligent to people who are incapable of any level of critical thinking or nuance and believe everything in the world is either 100% A or 100% B with no in-between. Sadly, this is a large percentage of the population.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] EngineerGaming@feddit.nl 19 points 1 day ago (1 children)

A similar argument I hear is "If they want me, they will find and arrest me no matter my precautions".

Kinda yes... But why are you talking about threat models that include someone deliberately hunting you down? We are not high-ranking dissidents or criminals that they would put effort and money into finding. Our concern is passive surveillance - maybe the collected info doing us a disservice (like being leaked for scammers or sold to an evil ex), maybe even something mundane getting flagged and us being arrested just to serve as an example.

[–] NaNin@lemmy.dbzer0.com 10 points 1 day ago (4 children)

e.g. Period tracking apps being used as evidence when prosecuting people who seek abortions

[–] XTL@sopuli.xyz 5 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago)

Yes. There are a lot of reasons why any one of us could turn into a high value target at the drop off a hat. If not to a government, then to an organisation or a lone lunatic.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 4 points 21 hours ago (1 children)

I use Edge on my work laptop because:

  • Vertical Tabs
  • Logs into my SSO account
  • Leaks info from my computer like a sieve (it's my employer's info, and they don't deserve privacy)
[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 1 points 4 hours ago
  • Vertical Tabs

Brave, Vivaldi, Arc, Floorp and Zen have those

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 9 points 1 day ago

The op in that post is 14 years old at most. Just look at how that shot is tailored.

[–] DieserTypMatthias@lemmy.ml 7 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Get off Reddit. Karma grind is not worth it.

[–] Ascend910@lemmy.ml 5 points 1 day ago (2 children)

Agree, I am primarily on lemmy now. People here are way nicer to each other than Reddit

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 6 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

People here are way nicer to each other than Reddit

If one has the right kind of opinions. 🤷

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 13 hours ago (1 children)

depends on the instance, if you're nice it's really hard to get banned on .world or blahaj.zone, on grad or ml tho you gotta be authoritarian

[–] DrDystopia@lemy.lol 1 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

What's nice to some is authoriterian to others.

[–] random@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 1 hour ago

no, what's forced on others, no matter how nice is authoritarian

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] beta@lemdro.id 2 points 20 hours ago (1 children)

I don’t think I’ve had an issue on Firefox other than some sites saying “unsupported browser,” which is really the site’s fault.

[–] wrekone@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 14 hours ago

I found Firefox to be much slower than Chrome... 10 years ago. Now, not only is it just as fast, it's a much better experience all around.

[–] ganymede@lemmy.ml 49 points 1 day ago (3 children)

my guess is its just another flavour of cope.

imo likely because recent history has began to undermine the delusions which were propping up the former flavour.

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments
view more: next ›