this post was submitted on 01 Nov 2024
14 points (100.0% liked)

Casual Conversation

9 readers
11 users here now

Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.


RULES

Casual conversation communities:

Related discussion-focused communities

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 

YouTube? Deleted comment. Twitter? Banned, Reddit? Shadow banned and blocked Xbox live? You get kicked out online mode despite you are PAYING for it. You can't express your anger or hate towards other people without some kind of freedom.

No I'm not saying that RACISM or serious accusations should be allowed, but a simple "fuck u" gets you eliminated. Is depressing.

top 42 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 16 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

What? Yes you can. Observe:

Go fuck yourself, OP.

It's also not like getting banned for petty reasons is anything new. Forum ops, chat admins, moderators, etc all create and control the communities regardless of any corporate entities who own the website as a whole wanting to keep things PG for advertisers. Many of them do so because they themselves got kicked out of somewhere else. If you go into Big Jim's forum and post a bunch of hate about Big Jim, expect Big Jim to ban your ass.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

What you are saying is that we are all children and we are governed best with children's rules.

I'm gonna go ahead and disagree with your initial premise there.

[–] Kolanaki@yiffit.net 4 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (1 children)

and we are governed best with children's rules.

I said nothing of the sort. The first part is accurate; the petty mods who ban people just for disagreeing with them are children and play by children's rules. How you came to the conclusion that I am suggesting that is the best way to do things, though, is beyond me. I simply stated the reality.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

ah, my mistake.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 15 points 1 week ago (2 children)
[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

hey you're being upvoted. What do you suppose that means?

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

How so? It used to be the most natural thing in the world and never cared about being insulted, this sanitation of, well everything, disgust me.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (1 children)

People have always cared about being insulted. Being a kind person is a fundamental survival instinct. Humans are social animals, and rely on trust. Sometimes people might say egregious things and there's some room to sternly tell them that they are wrong, or even that what they are saying is harmful.

But this desire to be derogatory to other people just because you disagree with them isn't healthy. I completely understand the appeal of telling someone to choke on a wet bag of turds when they say they're pro-life or anti-gay-marriage or something, but that doesn't get you anywhere. It's just you losing control of your emotions and saying something stupid and getting yourself into trouble.

If someone has said something that upsets you, and you want to say something to them about it, take the time to articulate what the problem is and why it matters to you. Take the high road, and let them be the one to cast the first stone. Then you can report them and get them banned instead of giving them the satisfaction of doing it to you because you broke first.

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

I NEVER cared about taking the high road. I would feel like a... See? This is Problem, I can't talk freely

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 9 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can talk freely, you just don't have the emotional intelligence to talk in a way that people want to listen to, so people show you the door.

What you have discovered is that antisocial behavior has negative social consequences.

[–] Incandemon@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Not OP but had a thought reading your comment. I wonder how much of this perceived shift in language is driven by corpo's sanitizing for advertisers and how much is young people who have been fully raised online.

As you say, humans are social animals. It makes sense to me then, that if you were raised within an online environment you would naturally extend that sociability to it. However, if much of this technology grow after you were socialized would you be more inclined to see it as a relief valve to vent anger into.

[–] todd_bonzalez@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

It is more an issue that the Internet lets people hide behind anonymity and avoid witnessing the actual consequences of their cruelty. It's the same dynamic that can cause road rage: if they can't see your face they don't have to acknowledge your humanity, and therefore don't have to care if they hurt you.

And that's the issue. You can't vent anger into the Internet without being an angry person in front of or at others. The Internet isn't a soulless network of machines, it's filled with real people. If you use other people as your anger relief valve, those people aren't going to like you or want you around.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You are exactly the kind of person that causes me to avoid games I may play with randos, and keep all of my channels on a game muted.

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

I don't chat with anyone dude.

[–] nokturne213@sopuli.xyz 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

So you are just yelling fuck you in your living room and getting banned?

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago

I'm talking about live chat

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 4 points 1 week ago

And yet somehow you're getting banned for saying "fuck you".

I see a contradiction here.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 3 points 1 week ago

Whereas from this end, this insistence upon having the "right" to be a vicious boor disgusts me.

And it turns out I'm far more normal in this regard than the opposing stance is, given that social media sites, et al are bleeding users over it.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 10 points 1 week ago (3 children)

It's a simple solution; don't hate. If you disagree, find a more creative way to express it besides "fuck off".

Try this one: say "I hope the rest of your day is as pleasant as you are"

[–] schizo@forum.uncomfortable.business 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

The real pro move is to learn to just roll your eyes, and walk away.

Or block them, and walk away.

It makes certain angry-on-the-internet types so so SO mad when you just shrug and ignore them, but alas, it's a lost art since everyone likes being mad about everything all the time now.

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I agree to the least extent. I agree that when people express their hate, it doesn't bother me. However, I'm a smartass. I always have something to say about everything, which, fairly, I should work on. But I'm also a pretty skilled smartass. I've resorted to translating the smartass statement and then taking it word-for-word serious. It upsets people so much

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

You can't be serious. That's nothing

[–] EABOD25@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Well, you seem like are person that I don't want to speak with even online. Have you thought you might be the prlem?

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago
[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 1 points 1 week ago

Well you can hate plenty without saying "fuck off". You can stalk them and report anything they say that plausibly crosses the line. You can play passive-aggressive games. You can downvote. You can argue in poor faith.

Plenty of hateful ways to express yourself within the bounds of the rules. It's arguably the path to success.

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Why do you feel entitled to express anger or hatred toward people?

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

Because it feels right. What's your guiding principal?

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) (3 children)

Well, for starters, when they say something that disgust me or pisses me off online. Not being able to express freely sucks

[–] dandelion@lemmy.blahaj.zone 9 points 1 week ago

Have you considered that your anger can have consequences for people on the other side, and that this can even be harmful - and that if you feel disgusted or upset about something it doesn't always give you the right to express that anger directly at someone?

I mean, I want to be sympathetic, I get how a corporate and sanitized internet can feel wrong and changes the kinds of community that are possible, e.g. young boys on Xbox live were known for saying vile things and riling one another up (as boys commonly do), but as someone who was also present in that culture at the time, not everyone felt at home or comfortable in that environment, and the bullying and culture often made me feel like I couldn't enjoy those games.

Sometimes tolerance and civility is a small price to pay in exchange for making spaces accessible to other people. That said, I'm not sure every space needs to be like this - so again, I want to be sympathetic here.

[–] Auster@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

There's a saying in my mother tongue that goes like "say what you want, hear what you don't". Even in situations where you need to have a more coarse tone, having some level of finesse to the words sent would help not just in not getting sanctioned, but also on getting past people's defenses more easily.

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

That shit NEVER works. Especially online, just for being a goodie 2 shoes online nobody is going to be "oh yeah you're right, I apologise and I'll change my ways" life isn't a Disney movie

[–] Auster@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Finesse doesn't mean bowing down to everyone. And indeed, expecting people to put their egos aside, at least quickly, is unrealistic, and even if the person takes in the points later on, chances of admitting are also low. But for example, if the person is clearly aggressive by his/her discourse, specially when including swear words, people tend to close down to whatever the first person is trying to say, or even respond proportionally aggressively.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

Being told how to express yourself under threat of having the power to express yourself taken away appeals only to the cretins. Unfortunately the cretins are in the majority. They eat crap and smile.

[–] shinigamiookamiryuu@lemm.ee 6 points 1 week ago

I don't encourage insulting, but the most durable ones (and, by some peoples' definitions, more tolerable, often because they appeal to some kind of truth) are usually the oddly creative/specific ones. For example, there's the famous Shakespeare line "I'd engage a battle of wits with you, but I see you're unarmed". Basically what Dirty Harry and Sgt Hartman do. In contrast, you have things like the "F you" and the "a**hole" which just seem like you're throwing what you can find.

[–] ZDL@ttrpg.network 5 points 1 week ago

What a mystery. Abuse upsets people, and upset people leave businesses where they get upset. And those businesses ban the abusers?

What. A. Shock.

Let's pretend this isn't online space and is, instead, say, the local deli. People go there to get food and see that a fellow customer likes to abuse people. The staff of the deli do nothing about it. So now people stop going to that deli and go somewhere else. (Note: not just the people being abused, but people who witness the abuse going unchallenged by the owner.)

So let's go over the decision-making process:

  1. Say "meh" and let the abuser drive off multiple customers. (Lost customers: >> 1)
  2. Ban the abuser from the premises. (Lost customers: 1)

Which is the approach that doesn't kill the business?

Now jack up the paint job, insert an online space, lower the paint job. Do you think the calculus is any different?

And in case you think people don't leave because of this kind of abuse, I dropped Twitter (loooooooooooooooong before Apartheid Manchild was its owner!) despite only rarely being the recipient of abuse. It was the culture of abuse that was everywhere, in practically every thread, that made me decide Twitter was a festering shitpile. (Again, even before the Manchild took it over.) Sure the abusers were a minority, but they were basically in any thread that was in any way public. And that just wasn't the vibe I was interested in.

[–] P4ulin_Kbana@lemmy.eco.br 4 points 1 week ago

You should have said this in the unpopular opinion community, honestly.

[–] TexMexBazooka@lemm.ee 4 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Yeah?

Go fuck yourself

I love you

Mods are now too confused of my true connotation to ban me

Cunt

[–] Platypus@lemmings.world 2 points 1 week ago

That's the nicest thing someone has said to me I a while

[–] forrgott@lemm.ee 3 points 1 week ago

Wow. The unnecessary negativity in online communications is one of the worst parts of the Internet. But a small reduction in negative bullshit that's allowed actually depresses you?!?

Go fuck yourself.

[–] infinite_ass@leminal.space 2 points 1 week ago

It's messed up that you're being downvoted. It's strange to think that most of us never cross the lines established by the censors. They like having a daddy-cop to tell everybody how to talk.

Average lemmy user.

[–] apotheotic 1 points 1 week ago

People have started treating online spaces as ones that should have some modicum of decorum and lack of abuse. Its not a surprise. Just be a kinder, less hateful person.