this post was submitted on 15 Oct 2024
310 points (100.0% liked)

Piracy: ꜱᴀɪʟ ᴛʜᴇ ʜɪɢʜ ꜱᴇᴀꜱ

1444 readers
26 users here now

⚓ Dedicated to the discussion of digital piracy, including ethical problems and legal advancements.

Rules • Full Version

1. Posts must be related to the discussion of digital piracy

2. Don't request invites, trade, sell, or self-promote

3. Don't request or link to specific pirated titles, including DMs

4. Don't submit low-quality posts, be entitled, or harass others



Loot, Pillage, & Plunder

📜 c/Piracy Wiki (Community Edition):


💰 Please help cover server costs.

Ko-Fi Liberapay
Ko-fi Liberapay

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
top 45 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Fester@lemm.ee 144 points 1 month ago (1 children)

It sued itself in its confusion!

[–] Samsy@lemmy.ml 34 points 1 month ago

This isn't very effective.

[–] jjlinux@lemmy.ml 76 points 1 month ago (2 children)

LMAO. Fuck Nintendo and the "do as I say not as I do" BS.

Emulation is perfectly legal if you own the game.

[–] IHeartBadCode@fedia.io 25 points 1 month ago

~~do as I say not as I do~~

Nintendo: Money! Fuck everything else.

All other attributes derive from that.

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 26 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This really isn't that surprising. They used ROMs for the classic games in Animal Crossing. They even had evidence it was from a release group, and not Nintendo's own copies

I really don't understand why this is embarrassing. I don't know the exact setup they have going on. Is it like a kiosk where people can play classic games, or is it a monitor just displaying them? They have their own emulator, Canoe, that they used for the SNES Classic. I don't remember the name of the NES one

Weren't at least some of the games in the Super Mario Collection ROMs? I guess I can see why people would expect a direct port from the company that created it, or original hardware running the original games, but it isn't like Nintendo doesn't already have a track record for this sort of thing

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 58 points 1 month ago (3 children)

It's embarrassing because of how extremely litigious Nintendo is, and that they are themselves profiting using other people's work (emulators and/or ROMs acquired from the internet), the exact thing they ruin lives over.

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 9 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

I'm not saying they haven't used others work in the past, but they do have their own emulators and ROMs. They have for a long time. They are still terrible, but this just doesn't seem like a big deal to me

Edit: Also, whose lives have they ruined aside from those profiting off of distributing copyrighted material? Taking down a fan game doesn't sound life ruining

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Just so we're clear, are you under the impression that "ROMs acquired from the Internet" represent something other than Nintendo's work?

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 11 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Yes, i would generally consider ripping roms as something requiring effort similar to cracking a game

[–] TheOctonaut@mander.xyz 7 points 1 month ago (1 children)

...

"Ripping" ROMs, or dumping them, takes almost no effort. If you have the cartridge reader its about as much work as taking photos off an SD card. Certainly nothing at all like cracking a game, which is pretty much software development.

Please consider informing yourself before forming strong opinions.

[–] Zorsith@lemmy.blahaj.zone 5 points 1 month ago

This is the part where I focus for half a second and realize this is about SNES and everything makes a lot more sense. I would hope newer stuff would have some form of protection 😅

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 3 points 1 month ago

Aren't the emulators licensed for this kind of use?

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 16 points 1 month ago (2 children)

This means you can find the pc and get THEIR OWN EMULATOR, make it open source and fuck them royally.

[–] 4am@lemm.ee 23 points 1 month ago (2 children)

You think they wrote their own emulator instead of just taking one of the free ones on the internet (who they will likely sue later). That's cute.

[–] DarkMetatron@feddit.org 20 points 1 month ago

Well yes, yes they did. It is called Canoe and is for example running inside the SNES Classic Mini. And that is not the only emulator they wrote. Writing an emulator is not some obscure magic, and it is way easier if you own all the schematics and other Information used to build the original hardware.

[–] Alice 2 points 1 month ago

Is it a known thing that they discontinued canoe or something?

[–] catloaf@lemm.ee 8 points 1 month ago (1 children)

That's not how any of that works

[–] BonerMan@ani.social 3 points 1 month ago (1 children)

Why? You can just say its the official Nintendo emulator.

Nobody gives a shit if its legal or not, this is a Nintendo bashing club. We hate them and wish them to go bankrupt.

[–] Lumu@lemmy.blahaj.zone 7 points 1 month ago

Sure but why would the source code be available? It'd be funny if it was but it's probably a compiled program, right?

[–] Blaze@lemmy.zip 14 points 1 month ago (1 children)
[–] bjoern_tantau@swg-empire.de 42 points 1 month ago (2 children)

Their NES and SNES mini consoles were also just off the shelf ARM SBCs running emulators. If I recall correctly people even found signatures of release groups in some of the ROMs.

[–] SitD@lemy.lol 16 points 1 month ago

technicians just know what's good. unfortunately every company becomes too big for its own good and inspirationless ghouls take over 😔 the palworld thing also just shows they could be so successful if they take off the shackles and make a good game, but now they want to shackle everyone else so no one can have good games

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 1 month ago (1 children)

They are at least Nintendo's own in-house emulators. I don't recall the situation with the Classic systems ROMs, but Animal Crossing had the release group signatures if I'm not mistaken. They've been pulling this garbage for a long time

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 6 points 1 month ago (1 children)

The nes roms in animal crossing for N64 had the header for the ines emulator. Now, a few years before Nintendo hired a guy who worked on the audio driver for ines, and that tomohiro is credited with lots of emu projects for Nintendo, so it's not impossible that they reused that header idea. In the gigaleak there's a tool that adds the ines header to clean roms.

This said, it's also not impossible that they're taking a peek in other OSS emulators source code, i recall that luigiblood (a guy obsessed in decompiling Nintendo emulators) found traces of 64dd emulator code from pj64 in some Nintendo product, which then was silently removed after he tweeted about that

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 1 month ago (1 children)

This is very educational, thank you. Just out of curiosity, what has Nintendo done with the 64dd? I thought they had forgotten about it

[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

They seem to have included support for an unofficial 64dd cartridge adapter used for homebrew/development/piracy which for an official product makes no sense

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 weeks ago

That's very interesting. I can't even think of a game worth doing that for. Not trying to say there isn't, I just don't have one off the top of my head

[–] bender223@lemmy.today 12 points 1 month ago

Someone call Alanis Morisette 🤣

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 12 points 1 month ago (3 children)

What's so embarrassing? Emulation for backward compatibility is done all the times

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 17 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I guess people are assuming it runs whatever third party emulator. It was at least how I first imagined it.

If that's the case, it's in my opinion very embarrassing: attempting to profit from stuff made by the community they act extremely hostile towards.

If not, I guess it's just mildly embarrassing that they have a poorly concealed windows machine taking away from the immersion.

[–] greenacres3233@lemmy.dbzer0.com 6 points 1 month ago (2 children)

I read through the article, only speculation but since the sound is without a doubt the USB being disconnected then it's pretty obvious an Windows machine running a rom.

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 4 points 1 month ago* (last edited 1 month ago)

Well yeah, but it might as well be their own in-house emulator.

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 month ago

They really should have used their own PC OS

[–] lowleveldata@programming.dev 3 points 1 month ago (2 children)

It's a weird assumption. Like I said, emulation for backward compatibility is common. Do they always just wait for some random strangers to implement an emulator for them?

[–] Bezier@suppo.fi 5 points 1 month ago

It's a weird assumption. Like I said, emulation for backward compatibility is common.

Nintendo has some serious emulation experts for building products, but this setup rigged by some museum staff could be anything.

Do they always just wait for some random strangers to implement an emulator for them?

Waiting? There is zero chance availability is an issue. There are many ready to go snes emulators for windows out there.

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 1 month ago

They have literally had their own emulators for so long. At least since the SNES Classic released. It is called Canoe

[–] HappyFrog@lemmy.blahaj.zone 1 points 3 weeks ago

Thst they use windows, ew

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Moonrise2473@feddit.it 9 points 1 month ago

It would be interesting to plug an usb rubber duckie to own that station and dump all the disk somewhere

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

how did lemmy piracy suddenly turn to defending nintendo...

nintendo pulls rom sites down, sure - it's their shit (https://www.pcworld.com/article/402404/nintendo-suit-rom-emulation-game-preservation.html)

Nintendo is using roms from these sites to sell to consumers within their own "ecosystem" (https://www.eurogamer.net/did-nintendo-download-a-mario-rom-and-sell-it-back-to-us)

Not even close to all of nintendos titles are avaliable on their online stores, and the mini-snes or whatever did not have even close to all their titles.

point is. Nintendo is NOT preserving their own games. And they sue anyone doing anything like preserving it for the public.

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 4 weeks ago (1 children)

Then please explain the Dolphin Emulator to me

[–] Cassa@lemmy.blahaj.zone 3 points 3 weeks ago (1 children)

what? whaddya mean? the fact that it exists?

https://arstechnica.com/gaming/2023/05/the-solid-legal-theory-behind-nintendos-new-emulator-takedown-effort/

or the fact that nintendo doesn't want it to "spread" Come here without defending big megacorpo or leave please

[–] Biskii@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 3 weeks ago* (last edited 3 weeks ago)

That literally says theory in the title

This isn't even your instance and you are telling me to leave lmao

[–] Xianshi@lemm.ee 4 points 3 weeks ago

Fuck nintendo

[–] K0W4LSK1@links.hackliberty.org 1 points 4 weeks ago

do you think they make the games on consoles as well.