this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2024
90 points (100.0% liked)

Do It Yourself

7723 readers
1 users here now

Make it, Fix it, Renovate it, Rehabilitate it - as long as you’ve done some part of it yourself, share!

Especially for gardening related or specific do-it-yourself projects, see also the Nature and Gardening community. For more creative-minded projects, see also the Creative community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

jerk-sock

jerk-sock on a vacuum


old car

old car


perfectly good tennis balls

perfectly good tennis balls


dry wall

dry wall


sharp blades

who needs sharp blades anyways


art degree

art degree


Any more suggestions?

top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Vodulas 26 points 4 months ago (1 children)

What's a jerk sock? Also, if you get use out of it, you arguably did not ruin it.

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 3 points 4 months ago (1 children)

A sock that you cum into..

[–] Vodulas 5 points 4 months ago (1 children)

The one in the picture is a nylon stocking, so that would be a poor choice...

[–] winkerjadams@lemmy.dbzer0.com 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

As is putting it on a vacuum. I was answering the question though

[–] Vodulas 3 points 4 months ago

I wasn't trying to denigrate your comment. Just pointing out the use of "jerk sock" by OP was an odd choice

[–] blackluster117@possumpat.io 23 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I actually really like the plastic bag and bottle trick.

[–] Rubisco@slrpnk.net 9 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It's a lot of plastic. What if a canning jar was used instead? Then we just have to convince Packaging to switch to waxed paper bags or something.

[–] Vodulas 34 points 4 months ago (1 children)

It looks to be reusing a bread bag and an empty bottle, so those would have been trash. Reuse/repurposing is better than just throwing away.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 15 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Reduce
Reuse <- You are here
Recycle

Not using it at all would be better, sure, but if you don't have that option for whatever reason, reusing it is the next best thing. Don't let perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] Vodulas 4 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I think you may have meant to respond to the other person since this is pretty much what I said

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 10 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) (2 children)

I was supporting your point. I forget that comments are seen as counterargument by default.

But you're right, my comment would have been more useful in reply to the other person.

[–] Vodulas 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Ah got ya. Since you were responding to my comment it seemed like you meant that I was letting perfect be the enemy of good.

[–] lennivelkant@discuss.tchncs.de 2 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Me no word good 😄
Nah, you've got a point, my brain is just fried these days. I definitely need a vacation.

[–] Vodulas 2 points 4 months ago

No worries, I 100% feel ya

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 1 points 4 months ago (1 children)

You raise a great point about comments being seen as a counter by default. And if you try to give a disclaimer in your comment (like saying you agree) you still get downvoted for some reason. I'm very cautious about participating in any serious topics because of this, jokes, one-liners and sharing (unimportant) personal experiences are pretty much the only safe comments.

[–] t3rmit3 3 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Come on over to Beehaw, where we don't have downvotes, then!

It forces people to actually take time and effort to disagree with you, rather than just hitting one button, and somewhat unsurprisingly, that deters a lot of "drive-by" negativity.

[–] mugthol@lemmy.blahaj.zone 14 points 4 months ago

Most of these seem pretty reasonable to me. I guess I don't get this post.

[–] Axolotling 4 points 4 months ago

Op, do you just hate fun? most of these are pretty cute or funny and just because they're not the most efficient design doesn't mean they're not allowed to exist?