this post was submitted on 14 May 2024
181 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

308 readers
5 users here now

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 
top 47 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 104 points 6 months ago (2 children)

We can’t let stopping climate change get in the way of capitalism!

[–] ed_cock@feddit.de 12 points 6 months ago (3 children)

That's protectionism, not capitalism.

[–] jaspersgroove@lemm.ee 24 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

Tomato, tomato. The free market is a myth, there is no part of the economy that goes without manipulation. Anytime business owners can’t directly manipulate the market themselves they bribe governments to do it on their behalf.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 18 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] ed_cock@feddit.de 2 points 6 months ago (1 children)

No, protectionism exists outside of capitalism and even somewhat goes against the idea of capitalism, especially the free market kind.

[–] Kalkaline@leminal.space 8 points 6 months ago (1 children)

That's theoretical capitalism, in practice there is no free market.

[–] ed_cock@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)
[–] frippa@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago (1 children)
[–] ed_cock@feddit.de 1 points 6 months ago

'preciate it

Bait or brain damage. Call it

[–] some_guy@lemmy.sdf.org 1 points 6 months ago

Ooh, good point.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] vrighter@discuss.tchncs.de 50 points 6 months ago

these actions already admit defeat

[–] Cowbee@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Wow, does that mean we are ramping up domestic production for these? No? Oh...

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 4 points 6 months ago

Classic Ronco politics

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 48 points 6 months ago (1 children)

The rest of the world will get cheaper solar panels and EVs, that's quite nice.

[–] khorak@lemmy.dbzer0.com 12 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Cheap panels are tanking European competitors, but it's probably too late to intervene at this point. Can't compete with work camps and cheap slave labor.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 3 points 6 months ago

There are parts of the world not EU and US. They would all benefit from cheap panels.

But EU and US are not really important: https://www.statista.com/statistics/668749/regional-distribution-of-solar-pv-module-manufacturing/ they account only for few percent of solar photovoltaic module production.

[–] davel@lemmy.ml 37 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

Also medical supplies, including masks, because COVID is Joever.

Edit to add: There is necessarily a lag between tariff imposition and indigenous production, and we’re left to fill that gap with our own wallets individually. Worse, the prices will almost definitely never come back down as they might in theory, because this is late-stage capitalism.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 7 points 6 months ago

It'd be really funny if those raw milk drinkers started a bird flu pandemic during a medical PPE shortage 😂

[–] crazyminner@lemmy.ml 32 points 6 months ago (1 children)

You want Amerikkka to lead maybe subsidize EVs as well?

Why can't we all win? (Ide rather bus/rail and walkable cities)

[–] papertowels@lemmy.one 5 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

The government does subsidize EVs.

Additionally even used EVs are subsidized.

Between federal and state tax credits, as well as utility company rebates, my folks just got over 5k back for a used Nissan leaf. They were able to trade in their old clunker, netting a profit of a few hundred dollars to upgrade to a practical used EV.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 31 points 6 months ago

For every voter who wants a habitable planet, a cheap electric car, or to catch covid less we lose, we're gonna pick up two moderate republicans!

[–] NovaPrime@lemmy.ml 25 points 6 months ago

What a bell-end. Maybe instead of tariffs the US should begin vesting in education, job training, and research into these sectors so it can compete instead of trying to hobble the competition in the domestic market. This is just protectionism by a different name

[–] Fidel_Cashflow@lemmy.ml 24 points 6 months ago

Repeatedly stomping on my collection of rakes to own the commies

[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 22 points 6 months ago (1 children)

This dude really does not want to get reelected again. I hate that he's the only choice. What a piece of shit.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 11 points 6 months ago (4 children)
[–] MossyFeathers@pawb.social 13 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (2 children)

I'm not an accelerationist, so no, it's not really an option. It's cool that you feel like you have the ability to just say "no", but I don't. I have to live here, and if Trump gets elected then there is a very high chance I might find myself in a concentration camp before the end of his term, assuming he doesn't find a way to abolish elections entirely.

So no, I don't really have an option to just shove my thumb up my ass and refuse to vote.

Edit: Sorry about the double post, Lemmy was being weird.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 16 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (1 children)

There's a very high chance I might find myself in a concentration camp before the end of Biden's next term.

All that's needed is for my red state to declare being trans to be a sex crime, the Supreme Court to decide 5-4 that it's constitutional, and then I'm off to a farm. Biden and his supporters would do literally nothing and just use my internment in a camp as a fundraising pitch.

[–] Empathy 1 points 6 months ago (1 children)

If you are arguing against voting, then I'd like to know: do you think your chances are better if Trump wins, if Biden wins, or do you believe they are indistinguishable? I'm having trouble understanding this.

[–] queermunist@lemmy.ml 2 points 6 months ago

I don't think my chances are good under either President, but I also think Democrats are more likely to fight back if Trump wins. Trump saw the largest protest movement in American history. If the trans concentration camps happen under him then people will actually fight back. If they happen under Biden then people will just be told to vote harder next time so we can close the concentration camps! 🤮

[–] rjthyen@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Always have to vote for the furthest left that has a chance to win and hope enough others follow suit. Our system sucks, but the biggest thing holding us back is how far right the country currently is. Even though depressing, your attitude is currently our best shot and I appreciate that you're one of the seemingly few on this platform willing to voice it.

load more comments (3 replies)
[–] ColeSloth@discuss.tchncs.de 18 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

No one in the US will dive into major production of such things without a more guaranteed long term tariff. Not something that may go away within 5 years time. Also, there isn't a snowballs chance in hell the US will be a world leader in solar production. We might dominate the US market.

[–] fmstrat@lemmy.nowsci.com 16 points 6 months ago

Steel I get. That's an environmental issue since US creation is way more carbon friendly. However the rest makes no sense without an announcement in domestic investment that is pulled from currently used non-environmental budgets.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 15 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago) (3 children)

Can someone explain to me how tariffs help us? Couldn’t I buy a Chinese EV cheaper if there were no tariffs.?

[–] LeLachs@lemmy.ml 21 points 6 months ago (1 children)

Correct. If there were no tariffs, you could buy a chinese EV for cheap. In this case for so cheap that the domestic US/Non-Chinese market cannot compete. So in order to protect these markets, the product needs to be made artificially more expensive with tariffs. This way, the domestic markets have a chance of competing.

However, this also isolates the country and provokes retaliation from the other side. This usually results in both sides sabotaging their trade relations with each other (for ex. with tariffs) which is called a trade war.

[–] monobot@lemmy.ml 5 points 6 months ago

I would be surprised if China cares too much, there is the rest of the world that needs small cheap EVs and solar panels. But they must do something as response, that's diplomacy.

I also don't see the problem to put tariffs to protect domestic products, sometimes it is necessar, but prohibiting completely is not cool.

[–] Melkath@kbin.social 13 points 6 months ago (1 children)

It doesn't help you.

It helps Elon.

[–] aStonedSanta@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

Yeah. That was my biggest gripe actually 😆🫠

[–] HopFlop@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 6 months ago

Yeah but they dont want you to buy Chinese EVs, this essentially pushes non-chinese EVs (so US-made or ones from Europe)

[–] Sam_Bass@lemmy.ml 12 points 6 months ago* (last edited 6 months ago)

If hes going to do that he should light a fire under the domestics asses to get our own evs up to snuff. And market competitive. None of that whining how it cannot be done either

[–] JokeDeity@lemm.ee 10 points 6 months ago

That's... That's not how any of this works.

[–] Eryn6844 9 points 6 months ago

nice now the all the cartels will start wheeling and dealing cpus and evs woo woo..

[–] Crikeste@lemm.ee 4 points 6 months ago

This is what we needed to encourage the fascist Biden vote!

It will do wonders!

[–] glouriousgouda@lemmy.myserv.one 3 points 6 months ago

Let's get a tarrif on major grocery and supply chain vendors at home first.