this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

18 readers
15 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Five LA high school students were expelled Friday for the same thing.

top 12 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Sibbo@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 months ago (3 children)

They expel high school students over that? I mean sure, it's not good. But I believe that since this stuff is so new, teens don't have a feeling for right and wrong there yet. It's also different to taking actual nude pictures of people. I would expect schools to give people a talk about this, and maybe educate everyone during sex education about this stuff.

[–] wetnoodle@sopuli.xyz 11 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Kid is lucky he's not going to juvenile detention, making and sharing child porn is kinda an extremely serious crime, even if you're in high school and the cp is ai generated

[–] GBU_28@lemm.ee 5 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago)

calling out that I've read pedos on this site advocating for AI generated content. This is problematic in a lot of ways. Normalizing ai cp, of people you know or not is nasty as fuck.

This highschool stuff is the next level of problematic because it is based on people in the local system, and is often weaponized.

[–] darkphotonstudio 4 points 8 months ago

America is all about punishment.

[–] Phil_in_here@lemmy.ca 2 points 8 months ago

While I was initially inclined to agree with you on the argument of "where's the law, where's the line" the article is pretty clear there is a law for it where they live.

On the one hand, yeah, I generally agree that children shouldn't be arrested for something they're doing just goofing around (to them it seems like a victimless crime), but on the other hand, it's a sexual crime against children which I firmly believe should have zero tolerance.

AI seems to be getting the same "what can you do about it" privilege as guns, which should be the focus.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 4 points 8 months ago (1 children)

boy draws girl halfnaked: oh what a romantic artist

boy cant draw, uses ai: die in hell

[–] sonori 20 points 8 months ago (1 children)

Boy creates fake photorealistic porn of a girl and passes it all around school to bully, harass, and encourage them to kill themselves: it’s just like drawing a picture of your date.

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago (1 children)

you are sure about the intentions?

[–] Baguette@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

under a state law passed in 2022 which makes it a felony to share “any altered sexual depiction” of a person without their consent.

They got charged with sharing photos without the other party's consent. Lets be honest, sharing nudes without consent has been a rampant problem for a long while, and ai has made it 10 times worse

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

and is considered to make someone kill themselves? backed by a new law from 2022?

you are over your head. and you are terrible for claiming that the boys intention was that the girl kills herself. i think you kind of people are just sick and want others to feel bad.

anyway, let us look at civilisation: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161118/Aboriginal-erotic-rock-art-proves--28-000-years-ago--men-ONE-thing-minds.html

from the nonsense i read here i take that making a nakied depiction is a crime. as a european i think it is called art and being a human.

you on the other hand say that natural behaviour in men is bad. they always did and always will depict what they are interested in.

the result if this 2022 idiots act will be what? yes...and even dumber society: you paint real human...you go to jail. and we know men wont stop drawing. so they either go to jail....or, hear me out: further perversion of the US culture will happen. dont believe it? got proof! afghan men hardly see women...so female looking boys are forced sexslaves. and murica is smarter? LOL...sure not. you'll be flooded by more femboys, transmen and so on. merica is nothing but retarded at this point: only extremes matter to them. enjoy your next trump.

sure by murican standards the cavemen drew the cavewomen so she kills herself - he was just an evil animal not like the superior burgereating war machine. fuck america!

[–] pineapplelover@lemm.ee 3 points 8 months ago

They're high school they should know better. Heck any decent human should know that not just teens

i guess it's no surprise that ai is being used for this but fuck me that's disgusting