this post was submitted on 09 Mar 2024
35 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

18 readers
15 users here now

Which posts fit here?

Anything that is at least tangentially connected to the technology, social media platforms, informational technologies and tech policy.


Rules

1. English onlyTitle and associated content has to be in English.
2. Use original linkPost URL should be the original link to the article (even if paywalled) and archived copies left in the body. It allows avoiding duplicate posts when cross-posting.
3. Respectful communicationAll communication has to be respectful of differing opinions, viewpoints, and experiences.
4. InclusivityEveryone is welcome here regardless of age, body size, visible or invisible disability, ethnicity, sex characteristics, gender identity and expression, education, socio-economic status, nationality, personal appearance, race, caste, color, religion, or sexual identity and orientation.
5. Ad hominem attacksAny kind of personal attacks are expressly forbidden. If you can't argue your position without attacking a person's character, you already lost the argument.
6. Off-topic tangentsStay on topic. Keep it relevant.
7. Instance rules may applyIf something is not covered by community rules, but are against lemmy.zip instance rules, they will be enforced.


Companion communities

!globalnews@lemmy.zip
!interestingshare@lemmy.zip


Icon attribution | Banner attribution

founded 11 months ago
MODERATORS
 

Five LA high school students were expelled Friday for the same thing.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] Baguette@lemmy.ml 6 points 8 months ago* (last edited 8 months ago) (1 children)

under a state law passed in 2022 which makes it a felony to share “any altered sexual depiction” of a person without their consent.

They got charged with sharing photos without the other party's consent. Lets be honest, sharing nudes without consent has been a rampant problem for a long while, and ai has made it 10 times worse

[–] yournamehere@lemm.ee 1 points 8 months ago

and is considered to make someone kill themselves? backed by a new law from 2022?

you are over your head. and you are terrible for claiming that the boys intention was that the girl kills herself. i think you kind of people are just sick and want others to feel bad.

anyway, let us look at civilisation: https://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2161118/Aboriginal-erotic-rock-art-proves--28-000-years-ago--men-ONE-thing-minds.html

from the nonsense i read here i take that making a nakied depiction is a crime. as a european i think it is called art and being a human.

you on the other hand say that natural behaviour in men is bad. they always did and always will depict what they are interested in.

the result if this 2022 idiots act will be what? yes...and even dumber society: you paint real human...you go to jail. and we know men wont stop drawing. so they either go to jail....or, hear me out: further perversion of the US culture will happen. dont believe it? got proof! afghan men hardly see women...so female looking boys are forced sexslaves. and murica is smarter? LOL...sure not. you'll be flooded by more femboys, transmen and so on. merica is nothing but retarded at this point: only extremes matter to them. enjoy your next trump.

sure by murican standards the cavemen drew the cavewomen so she kills herself - he was just an evil animal not like the superior burgereating war machine. fuck america!