U.S. News

2244 readers

4 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza

rs5th

Powderhorn

Pastor’s Sermon Implying Women in Shorts Deserve to Be Raped Prompts Response (julieroys.com)

submitted 9 months ago by remington to c/usnews

15 comments fedilink hide all child comments

top 15 comments

sorted by: hot top controversial new old

[–] ApeNo1@lemm.ee 42 points 9 months ago (1 children)

In other words this creep has thought about raping women who are wearing shorts. Authorities should be putting him on a watch list.

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 23 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This guy is super likely to be a rapist

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 15 points 9 months ago (1 children)

This guy is super likely to get raped if he ever wears shorts again

[–] zcd@lemmy.ca 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

If he dresses like that he’s asking for it

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 13 points 9 months ago (1 children)

Especially if he’s wearing red underwear

[–] ThatFembyWho@lemmy.blahaj.zone 6 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I mean, if God lets it happen, it was meant to be

[–] DogPeePoo@lemm.ee 3 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)

The Lord doth work in mysterious, rapey ways

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 15 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

Here's what I don't get: In a lot of churches, isn't the guy standing up at front supposed to be telling you literally the word of God? Like God's anointed representative on earth? I know that's how it's supposed to work for the pope; like it's officially supposed to be absolutely impossible for the pope to ever be wrong in any statements about anything. Shouldn't this seem to the church goers like finding out that your doctor actually doesn't have a medical degree? Or like he thinks your heart is in your leg or something? It seems like "oops I made a mistake, I definitely know it's in the chest now, we all live and learn sometimes" should not by any means be the end of that conversation.

[–] t3rmit3 28 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (2 children)

No. In Catholicism, when a Pope makes official rulings on matters of Catholic doctrine it is supposed to be infallible. It also must be explicitly invoked as ex cathedra, meaning "from the chair", as applying to all Catholics. The last time that happened was in 1950, with a doctrinal ruling on the nature of the Assumption of Mary. It also cannot be a new doctrine, only a ruling on the nature of an existing one, so it's meant to be sort of akin to a SCOTUS ruling interpreting a law, rather than being an executive order.

In Protestant and other Reformation-derived denominations (e.g. Evangelicals) Pastors are not supposed to be authoritative or infallible. They just often present themselves that way.

[–] mozz@mbin.grits.dev 1 points 9 months ago

Fair point

load more comments (1 replies)

[–] Safeguard 9 points 9 months ago

We need a new corona that targets christo-fascists...