this post was submitted on 28 Jan 2024
99 points (100.0% liked)

Melbourne

43 readers
36 users here now

This community is a place created for the people of Melbourne and Victoria. We are a positive, welcoming and inclusive community. We might not agree about everything, but we always strive to stay civil and respectful.

The focus of our discussions is based around things that effect Victoria, but we are also free to discuss our local perspective on wider issues. Or head to the regular Daily Random Discussion thread to talk about anything.

Full Community Guidelines

Ongoing discussions, FAQs & Resources (still under construction)

Adoption Certificate for Nellie, the Daily Thread numbat (with thanks to @Catfish)

Feedback & Suggestions

founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
 
top 7 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Pons_Aelius@kbin.social 51 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

What I don't understand is this. The person owns the bookshop and is complaining about what is on the shelves.

Aren't they in charge of what they stock?

If they feel so fervently about this why are they stocking (and I assume selling) these books that offend them so much?

If you feel this strongly, empty your shop of all those works that offend you and only stock things that meet you approval and stop your bitching online about something you control...

[–] Jimmycrackcrack@lemmy.ml 5 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago) (1 children)

I guess their response if you said to this to them would be that they actively are trying to do exactly as you suggest, hence the posts and with regard to the list of materials they seem to be sick of seeing, they'd probably say this is what they continue to be offered from publishers when they try to stock their shop making the task difficult.

I don't think from the posts alone there's necessarily a logical flaw or hypocrisy to what they're saying, but certainty an inflated sense of their own idea of what public opinion is and a very distorted understanding of what literature outside of the narrow confines of what they deem acceptable is for and about.

I think they maybe get some sense of how fucked up the sentences their position requires them to write sound when they have to clarify what they mean by recasting the thing they reject as something else that sounds worse, hence "inclusion" becomes "anti-white exclusion" because even they perhaps realised that it's hard to sound like the good guy preaching against hate and division when you find yourself saying you don't want any books featuring inclusion.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Aussieiuszko@aussie.zone 31 points 9 months ago

Something to keep in mind next time you're thinking of supporting a local book seller. Luckily there's other options around.

[–] Tristaniopsis@aussie.zone 17 points 9 months ago (1 children)

I wish I lived in Melbourne so I could not go to that bookshop.

[–] Obi@sopuli.xyz 4 points 9 months ago

I live on the other side of the world, that just makes it even easier not to go.

[–] ElcaineVolta@kbin.social 13 points 9 months ago

she completely gives the game away when she says even being aware of indigenous people's history will automatically foster hate.

[–] anotherspringchicken@aussie.zone 8 points 9 months ago* (last edited 9 months ago)