this post was submitted on 21 Dec 2023
63 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10177 readers
20 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
top 18 comments
sorted by: hot top controversial new old
[–] Empricorn@feddit.nl 35 points 11 months ago

Conditional love. Her value decreases when she's "unspoiled". That is to say, if she experiences natural, normal human experiences.

These dudes are gross.

[–] watson387@sopuli.xyz 20 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Christians are gullible AF

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 10 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] t3rmit3 2 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Riskiest click of the month...

[–] Telorand@reddthat.com 2 points 11 months ago

But it was worth it, right?

[–] PhlubbaDubba@lemm.ee 15 points 11 months ago

Quoth the Privs, "But Dems Same Tho!"

[–] ted 12 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago) (1 children)

The headline was the tip of the iceberg. What a fascinating article. Jumps from homosexuality is "unnatural" to it somehow eroding the foundations of our democracy!

Favorite unhinged quote:

Homosexual relationships are inherently unnatural… ultimately harmful and costly for everyone.

I want "ultimately harmful and costly for everyone" on a t-shirt.

[–] sin_free_for_00_days@sopuli.xyz 7 points 11 months ago

This is pretty mild. Weird as hell, sure, but not even top 10 of things about Johnson to be weirded out about.

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 5 points 11 months ago (1 children)

This is child sex abuse full stop.

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 19 points 11 months ago (1 children)

Abuse, yes… sexual abuse, no. Psychological abuse is a better fit for this.

[–] Semi-Hemi-Demigod@kbin.social 6 points 11 months ago (1 children)

One could call it "grooming."

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

it literally is, and a common and socially acceptible kind at that. why do we tolerate this?

[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

What’s the solution to the problem?

[–] Uranium3006@kbin.social 3 points 11 months ago (1 children)
[–] Frog-Brawler@kbin.social 1 points 11 months ago (1 children)

How do you plan on destroying religion?

[–] Zworf 1 points 11 months ago* (last edited 11 months ago)

Yeah while I think religion is bad for society because it's been used as a cause for war, intolerance and hate throughout the centuries, destroying it isn't the answer. Some people just have the ingrained wish to obey a higher being and are willing to go to great lengths to make one up. Then people start forming rulesets around it in their favour to gain power, writing holy books etc.

Trying to destroy religion only hides it and makes it harder and more extremist. You can see this in for example the soviet union that repressed religion and turned into a LGBT-hating bastion of orthodoxism after it collapsed.

I think enforcing a baseline (LGBT rights as foundational human rights) and a clear split between state and religion is the only way, and from there try to mellow it down as much as possible.

I've been wondering why most religions are so hard anti-LGBT by the way. I think it's because of evolution: Successful religions create a lot of offspring through indoctrination. The Catholics for example make having babies almost a holy goal. And LGBT couples were not able to conceive until recently.