this post was submitted on 23 Jul 2023
319 points (100.0% liked)

Gaming

30554 readers
38 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

In a response to a post from the AntiDRM Twitter account, Ubisoft Support has clarified that users who don’t sign in to their account can potentially lose access to Ubisoft games they’ve purchased. The initial post from AntiDRM featured a snippet of an e-mail sent to a user from Ubisoft notifying them that their account had been temporarily suspended due to inactivity and warning that it would be closed permanently in 30 days. Responding to the ominous e-mail, the Ubisoft Support Twitter account stated “We certainly do not want you to lose access to your games or account” and noted that account closure could be avoided by signing in to the account again.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] ono@lemmy.ca 81 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (13 children)

Unless they also refund the price paid for the game, this is theft (or fraud), and should be punished as such.

[–] HiDiddlyDoodlyHo 45 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (2 children)

The problem is that online storefronts all lease (edit: it's actually license) you the games you own until your account is terminated. I miss actually owning media.

[–] ono@lemmy.ca 29 points 1 year ago (1 children)

The problem is that online storefronts all lease you the games

They license them. (A lease would normally have an expiration, and it would be clearly stated, which does not appear to be the case here.)

Accepting money and then refusing to honor the terms of exchange, whether it's an object or a license, is generally called fraud.

I miss actually owning media.

Yeah, I think most of us do.

[–] HiDiddlyDoodlyHo 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the correction on lease vs license; I didn't really understand the difference.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 24 points 1 year ago (1 children)

GOG comes close by allowing their users to get an installer if they want a back up.

[–] thejml@lemm.ee 10 points 1 year ago (1 children)

Correct, GoG is completely DRM free and has the ability to download offline installer packages for all your games. There are even a few scripts out there to do it for you.

Some of Steam’s content does as well, but not all and it’s hard to tell.

[–] strongarm@lemmy.dbzer0.com 2 points 1 year ago

GoG is no longer completely DRM free, one example is the Hitman games that require online connection to play.

[–] Chozo@kbin.social 22 points 1 year ago (2 children)

I agree, this is such a dangerously stupid move by Ubisoft.

I can only hope that this is just a mistake with an intern on their social account misinterpreting the ToS and that this isn't something Ubi plans to enforce. But damn, is it a bad look for them. Which is a shame, because they've been doing some decent work at improving their image as of late, too.

[–] NightOwl@lemmy.one 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Seriously. For pirates once a game is cracked there is zero worries of what will happen to my copy? Somewhere they will be able to retrieve the game even if they don't bother backing it up.

But, paying customers opt not to do that to rely on official channels for downloads and installs. To punish them and reminding them how inferior their copy of the game is in the long term to the cracked copy is a bad move. It'll only take losing their game once to lose faith in the platform and not bother buying again.

[–] hamiltonicity 2 points 1 year ago

I mean, let's not forget the whole sex predator thing. Their image is going to be faeces smeared on a bathroom wall until Guillemot goes.

load more comments (11 replies)