this post was submitted on 08 Jul 2023
80 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37705 readers
11 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Is it akin to the revolutionary code-breaking system from Digital Fortress called TRANSLTR?

I hope it won't.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] burrp@burrp.xyz 5 points 1 year ago (5 children)

This device should be seized and destroyed. Google have constructed a weapon.

[–] Lost_Wanderer 29 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Let it fold proteins and do space traveling calculations. Smashing tech is very Luditte

[–] Pseu 16 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

As a 70-qubit quantum computer, it's not going to be doing many helpful calculations. The benchmark used is random circuit sampling, which is doing a bunch of random quantum operations, and then reading the result, and it is compared to a supercomputer simulating the various random operations. This algorithm isn't useful outside of benchmarking.

This also makes Sycamore a particularly ineffective "weapon" considering that we don't really use encryption that's less than 1024 bits, which is well outside of the capability of our current quantum computers.

[–] 00@kbin.social 11 points 1 year ago (1 children)

As a 70-qubit quantum computer

Its cool to see that lemmy/kbin have such a diverse user base

[–] user224@lemmy.sdf.org 4 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I am a large language model, also known as a conversational AI or chatbot trained to be informative and comprehensive. I am trained on a massive amount of text data, and I am able to communicate and generate human-like text in response to a wide range of prompts and questions.

[–] 00@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I was expecting you to call yourself a sentient multi-zettaflop quantum frame or something.

[–] burrp@burrp.xyz 6 points 1 year ago (2 children)

You trust Google to use quantum tech for purely scientific pursuits?

[–] Lost_Wanderer 16 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I don't immediately distrust technology, like a moron.

[–] burrp@burrp.xyz 11 points 1 year ago

Keep it civil.

My distrust is in Google, not technology.

[–] fearout@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

I mean, there’s not much you can currently do on quantum computers. It’s basically either cracking encryptions or folding proteins at this point.

And quantum-proof encryption already exists.

(I’m oversimplifying, but quantum computer isn’t a faster computer. It’s just one that can solve a really narrow problem set faster. But you need a task that’s basically find 1 random correct answer out of these lots of possibilities. It won’t run Crysis. )

[–] Pseu 17 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's a 70-qubit quantum computer. It doesn't have enough memory to break even rudimentary 128-bit encryption.

The algorithm that it executed was also not Shor's algorithm (the one that could potentially break encryption). The benchmark used is called random circuit sampling, which is just doing a bunch of random quantum operations between pairs of qubits and then reading the output. It's one of the fastest quantum speedups of any known algorithm.

[–] argv_minus_one 8 points 1 year ago

“128-bit” usually refers to symmetric encryption, which is not broken by Shor's algorithm. 4096-bit RSA is what Shor's algorithm needs to break, and it's going to take a lot more than 70 qubits to do that. Like, two orders of magnitude more.

[–] Thalestr 8 points 1 year ago

Correction: Google should be seized and destroyed.

If not google then someone else will

Quantum computers have the potential to revolutionize medicine, not just crack encryption. It's better to develop it than not.

load more comments (1 replies)