Lost_Wanderer

Is There Anything to the Panic Over Ultraprocessed Foods?

What we know about them, what we don’t—and how to think about breakfast in the meantime.

Some 330 people, most of them Indigenous, live in the village of St. Paul, about 800 miles west of Anchorage, where the local economy depends almost entirely on the commercial snow crab business. Over the last few years, 10 billion snow crabs have unexpectedly vanished from the Bering Sea. I was traveling there to find out what the villagers might do next.

Special counsel Jack Smith earlier this spring issued a subpoena to the office of Arizona's secretary of state in a widening probe of former President Donald Trump's efforts to overturn the results of the 2020 presidential election.

According to the Arizona Republic, Smith's office "sought information related to two lawsuits, one from Trump's campaign and another from former Arizona Republican Party Chairwoman Kelli Ward, that alleged errors and fraud in the 2020 presidential results."

For years scientists have believed that when it comes to weight gain, all calories are created equal.

But an intriguing new study, published in the journal Nature Communications, suggests that’s not true. The body appears to react differently to calories ingested from high-fiber whole foods vs. ultra-processed junk foods.

The reason? Cheap processed foods are more quickly absorbed in your upper gastrointestinal tract, which means more calories for your body and fewer for your gut microbiome, which is located near the end of your digestive tract. But when we eat high-fiber foods, they aren’t absorbed as easily, so they make the full journey down your digestive tract to your large intestine, where the trillions of bacteria that make up your gut microbiome are waiting.

I have been looking at rack mounted shower for the ol' battlewagon and the price is just flabbergasting. REI, of all places, have plans online to build your own.

Messi looks to join the ranks of MLS with Inter Miami

https://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/2023/05/11/california-pork-rule-supreme-court/

The Supreme Court on Thursday upheld California’s right to block the sale of pork in the state unless producers abide by more humane regulations on the treatment of pregnant sows.

The decision touched on constitutional issues of interstate trade and splintered the justices outside of their usual liberal-conservative blocs.

Justice Neil M. Gorsuch, writing the majority in what boiled down to a 5-4 decision, rejected what he called a request by pork producers for the court to “fashion two new and more aggressive constitutional restrictions on the ability of States to regulate goods sold within their borders.”

“While the Constitution addresses many weighty issues, the type of pork chops California merchants may sell is not on that list,” Gorsuch wrote for a majority that included Justices Clarence Thomas, Sonia Sotomayor, Elena Kagan and Amy Coney Barrett.