this post was submitted on 02 Jul 2023
128 points (100.0% liked)
Politics
10180 readers
31 users here now
In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.
Guidelines for submissions:
- Where possible, post the original source of information.
- If there is a paywall, you can use alternative sources or provide an archive.today, 12ft.io, etc. link in the body.
- Do not editorialize titles. Preserve the original title when possible; edits for clarity are fine.
- Do not post ragebait or shock stories. These will be removed.
- Do not post tabloid or blogspam stories. These will be removed.
- Social media should be a source of last resort.
These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.
Subcommunities on Beehaw:
This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
While I may just not be well enough informed, I'm pretty sure Ben Wallace sincerely believes that providing support for Ukraine to repel the Russian invasion is in the best long-term interests of the UK (whether you personally agree with him that it does or not.)
I do agree that most of the members of recent UK government's have been largely preoccupied with projects that directly benefit them (or people funding them) at the cost of the nation and the world and anything other than their own personal self-interests.
It's worth trying to be aware of the areas where that isn't the case as best as possible. If nothing else as important practise for trying to pick out the few buried nuggets of good from the next government...
Very well said. It's also always helpful to focus on specific examples or - if you want to generalize - on particular studies or election results or whatever. Broad assertions are often too broad to be useful (he said, asserting broadly lol).