this post was submitted on 30 Jun 2023
25 points (100.0% liked)

World News

22058 readers
8 users here now

Breaking news from around the world.

News that is American but has an international facet may also be posted here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


For US News, see the US News community.


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

That moment when you are walking down the street and you accidentally tread in a steaming pile of irony.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] IAmWiking 23 points 1 year ago (4 children)

As it says in the article, he's been designated a PEP because he allegedly took money from the Russian government. He denies this but hasn't sued the person making the allegation. Even in his rant on GB news he lists Ukraine first as a potential state known for bribery. He excuses Russian actions at every turn, it's clear he's getting something from them.

[–] zero_iq@lemm.ee 8 points 1 year ago

He denies this but hasn’t sued the person making the allegation.

He can't, because it was said under parliamentary privilege. An MP (in this case, Chris Bryant) cannot be sued for statements made in Parliament.

I'm not going to defend Farage (I think he's a slimeball) but the fact he hasn't sued is not evidence either way.

[–] herriott101@kbin.social 7 points 1 year ago (2 children)

He denies this but hasn't sued the person making the allegation'

He can't sue the person who made the allegation. It was an MP who made the allegation in the House of Commons. This means that the MP is protected by Parliamentary Privilege which allows an MP to say whatever they want while in parliament. Very important for allowing MPs to have proper debate without interference.

However, having said that. I definitely think he did accept money from Russia (the truth is also a defence against being sued!). He appeared on Russia Today (state propaganda) a lot.

[–] IAmWiking 2 points 1 year ago

Thanks for the correction. I didn't realise the MP making the allegation was speaking in the commons.

[–] sab@kbin.social 1 points 1 year ago

I guess there is the off chance that he's just a complete moron, and bought into Russian state propaganda without even being paid for it.

[–] tal@kbin.social 5 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children)

He denies this but hasn't sued the person making the allegation

Setting aside the issue of whether-or-not he has received money, I don't think that it's a great idea to make the expected norm for someone to sue someone else if they're innocent of something that someone claims that they did. Kind of results in everyone running around with lawyers on hair-trigger.

[–] Anomandaris@kbin.social 3 points 1 year ago

Between normal people, or even minor celebrities, I would absolutely agree. But Farage is a notable entity in politics and journalism, one would hope that being accused of corruption, bribery, and treason would be ruinous for such a career. That is absolutely the sort of thing you would sue over, if you believed you had a good chance at winning.

[–] IAmWiking 2 points 1 year ago

Oh, I completely agree, but right wing grifters have a proud tradition of using libel laws to shut down criticism like this. Another commenter has explained that Farage can't actually sue in this case since the allegation is protected by Parliamentary Privilige, which probably explains why.

load more comments (1 replies)
[–] Hyperreality@kbin.social 4 points 1 year ago

Could also be a useful idiot.

Plenty of people shill for the current regime because they've bought the propaganda and the christian nationalism it pushes.