this post was submitted on 24 Feb 2025
867 points (100.0% liked)

Privacy

800 readers
72 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

John Oliver cited a 5000% rise in search queries related to leaving Meta and deleting accounts. Among the topics mentioned in the analysis, attention was drawn to early Facebook's naivete with regard to moderation requirements, the constitutional framework, and a history of governmental interference.

Oliver debunks common right-wing "cry censorship" talking points, as well as the objective difficulty of moderation endeavors, and how direct threats by Trump may have influenced Zuckerberg's turnaround.

Oliver went on to suggest Signal, Mastodon, Bluesky, and Pixelfed as alternatives that "do not seem as desperate to fall in line with Trump". For those reluctant to completely ditch Meta, Oliver revealed a new site with step-by-step instructions to "make yourself less valuable to them".

The guide was a collaboration with the EFF, and includes settings' tweaks for Facebook and Meta, whose 98% of revenue comes from micro-targeting ads, the host previously cited, to increase privacy, and recommends Firefox, Privacy Badger, as "other measures" to take in order "to block advertisers and other third parties from tracking you".

The segment culminated in a mock advert, in which the new Meta's approach to moderation is coined as "Fuck it", and hints to racism, internet scams, and calls to genocide running rampant on Meta's platforms.

The clip reminds the origins of Facebook as a site to "rank college girls by hotness", and its implication in genocide in Myanmar, which was more thoroughly discussed in an Oliver's previous special on Facebook in 2018.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] perishthethought@lemm.ee 42 points 6 days ago (6 children)

Why don't stories like this EVER mention Lemmy?

[–] OneTwoThree@mander.xyz 55 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Well, I get that Lemmy is an alternative social media, but it's not really an alternative to Facebook. Anonymous usernames, text-based posts, you can't follow people, Fediverse is somewhat confusing.. I'd recommend it as an alternative to Reddit, but probably not the website where boomers want to check up on their neighbors and friends

[–] jagermo@feddit.org 23 points 6 days ago

you can't follow people

Challenge accepted

[–] tal@lemmy.today 6 points 6 days ago

you can’t follow people

He said "Lemmy" but probably meant "Threadiverse", and mbin does support both the Twitter-style following user model and the Reddit-style forum model.

To use fedia.io as an example:

https://fedia.io/people

I dunno about piefed, haven't used it.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 12 points 6 days ago (2 children)

Because Lemmy is nowhere near as ready for primetime as other platforms.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 8 points 6 days ago (3 children)

I reckon Lemmy is actually pretty good. I wouldn't know if the mobile apps are good, because I don't use those - but for me the core functionality of Lemmy on my computer is smooth and functional. I don't see any obvious low-hanging-fruit.

[–] HobbitFoot@thelemmy.club 3 points 6 days ago

Lemmy is good for the size. It took a while for Lemmy to adjust to its current scale, with major instances having uptime issues.

If we keep the servers up, there is still issues with spam and moderation. We don't have the tools that Reddit built and I expect further pushes towards defederation as the standard for users hasn't been developed.

[–] Petter1@lemm.ee 1 points 6 days ago

Voyager ist amazing

[–] hanrahan@slrpnk.net 1 points 5 days ago

Boost on Android works well. It does for me at least.

[–] Zagorath@lemm.ee 1 points 5 days ago

Eh, Lemmy is way more mature as a platform than PixelFed is, and he mentioned that.

I think the explanation being in relation to what it's intended to replace is more likely. He doesn't care as much about getting people off Reddit as he cares about getting people off Zuck and Musk's platforms.

[–] whydudothatdrcrane@lemmy.ml 11 points 6 days ago (1 children)

Clean cut kids do not find Lemmy very palatable.

[–] doingthestuff@lemy.lol 11 points 6 days ago (2 children)

I don't find Lemmy very palatable. I'm still here because I like to hear different perspectives. Lemmy as a whole seems to hate different perspectives, it's like many go out of their way to keep it closer to a hive mind. 80% of the world's people would not fit in here. I don't either, but I don't give a shit.

[–] lena@gregtech.eu 12 points 6 days ago

Let's hear your different perspectives

[–] mctoasterson@reddthat.com 3 points 6 days ago

Agree. I am not an open socialist and my top 5 issues probably don't align with the usual stuff I see at the top of Lemmy communities. Still, it is a worthwhile source for some tech/privacy info and some other niche content.

[–] auraithx@lemmy.dbzer0.com 4 points 6 days ago

Not as many grassroots advocates. Even on the Reddit alternative sub the consensus isn’t lemmy somehow.

[–] tal@lemmy.today 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] Corgana@startrek.website 1 points 6 days ago

This is literally the answer lmao why are you getting downvoted.

[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 2 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] JasonDJ@lemmy.zip 3 points 6 days ago (1 children)
[–] DaseinPickle@leminal.space 1 points 6 days ago

Yes, those too