blind3rdeye

joined 1 year ago
[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago) (2 children)

[edit] I'd posted something to go into more detail. But I've decided that branch of conversation is not really the way forward.

I'll just say that the software is not installed by choice, and it does things that people don't want it to do... so it could be described as malware. But if you want it on your computer, then I guess for you it is not malware. In any case, it doesn't look like we're going to agree about this regardless.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 4 points 4 days ago (4 children)

Anti-cheat software is very clearly and explicitly spyware. That's the entire purpose of it. It spies on how you use your software in the hope that if you cheat you'll be seen by the spyware watching you.

This spyware is generally not something people want on their computer - as evidenced by people complaining about it. So effectively whats happening is that people are being spied on against their wishes. Spyware is a common category of malware.

So I think it's pretty easy to see why people might describe anti-cheat software as malware.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sorry, I'm not much help with that kind of advice. My knowledge about it mostly comes from dim memories of my time at university many years ago - with only some very minor bits being kept fresh by regular use.

My only suggestion is that it would be good to use a reputable textbook, so that you can be fairly confident that it is correct and not cutting corners; and then when you practice yourself, you should also make a conscious effort to not cut corners. (It's always tempting to just fudge any changes to arbitrary constants as being unimportant - since they are still arbitrary constants anyway; and mostly it doesn't matter. But that's a bad habit, because sometimes it does matter, and won't notice those times unless you've been paying attention all the time.) I won't try to recommend specific sources though, because I'm very out-of-date with that. I'll just say that published books used by universities are likely to be better than the notes of a private tutor or small online course.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago

I'm not sure I understand your mnemonic. It looks like you've got 1/sqrt(3) as one of your exact value for sine and cosine... but that surely isn't right.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 1 week ago (3 children)

I think they're just being very sloppy with their definitions of the arbitrary functions f and g. In that if you integrate some arbitrary function, then you get some other arbitrary function - and they just used the same name. That's my best guess for what they're doing.

Actually, there's a whole lot about that 'answer' that I don't like. I assume g(x) becoming g(y) is just a mistake. The implicit redefinition of the functions is bogus. And even if they were given new letters, I don't like that the integration constants / functions are introduced before the integral is done. Like, I guess they are a result of integrating the LHS - but then we're implicitly assuming that the other integral will give a constant of zero... To me that doesn't look like good technique. But then again, maybe I've misunderstood the whole thing!

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 3 weeks ago

I find Widelands to be slow and relaxing; but also challenging and engaging.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 6 points 1 month ago

Yeah. They've done a good job. Strategically its so that Steam can't easily be crushed under Microsoft's enormous boot. So it's a good forward-thinking commitment that everyone can benefit from. (Everyone except Microsoft, I suppose.)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 5 points 2 months ago

My latest favourite is missing: Note Taking Apps:

Joplin is good for organising text-based notes, so I'm not surprised to see that on your list. But xournal is a for mixed drawing / hand-writing / text, etc. So it's a different use-case to Joplin. (It would be perfect if Joplin supported xournal notes; so that you could write with xournal and then organise with Joplin. ... But that hasn't yet come to pass.)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago (1 children)

I wouldn't read too much into it. Using "he" instead of "it" is a mistake that a person might make if English is not their first language. It's pretty easy to imagine that someone working on a browser would not be interesting in messing around with the pronouns in their build instructions. They made an error, and they didn't think the error was important (which in itself was another error). But it is fixed now. Surely no harm done. They were not actively trying to impede anyone's progress or deny anyone's rights, or even say anything negative about anyone at all. They simply made a mistake in their use of pronouns in their build instructions. The mistake is now fixed. And although its fair to take it as a 'warning' that maybe there are objectionable views lurking in there, it certainly is not evidence of such views. I really don't think it's fair to hang this mistake over them. I'm sure that pretty much everyone in this thread has made worse mistakes throughout their lives. I know I certainly have.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 2 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago)

There are real problems transgender people are having, ladybird browser must be low on that priority.

Are you trying to tell me that Ladybird inadvertently referring to a computer process 'he' instead of 'it' is not a high priority problem for transgender people? What could possibly be worse? :p

(But seriously though. I find it really weird that people are still upset at Ladybird about this. It makes me wonder if there's some social manipulation going on. Like, is anyone actually upset about this, or is it just an excuse to attack the devs?)

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 38 points 2 months ago* (last edited 2 months ago) (5 children)

Is this because they used "he" instead of "they" in the build instructions? ... They changed that and acknowledged the mistake. Surely that's enough. It's the fucking build instructions. I think we can probably find it in our hearts to forgive them.

[edit] Just in case people think I'm joking. I'm not. As far as I'm aware, the critical incident that that has resulted in people calling Ladybird devs anti-trans is that they wrote 'he' instead of 'they' in the build instructions. That's what caused the original outrage. And as far as I'm aware, there have been no other incidents. But please, if there is something of substance that I'm not aware of, post about it here.

[–] blind3rdeye@lemm.ee 1 points 3 months ago

I'm pleased to hear that all the hardware is working.

I've been using Mint on my desktop for about a year, and it's been great. I'm now thinking that it's almost time to try it on my work computer too. I have a BYO device for work, and I use the touch screen and stylus a lot. So that that was one of the things I was a bit worried might give me trouble if I made the switch. Anyway, it's good to hear examples of that stuff working out nicely. It gives me more confidence.

 

I'm looking for discussion and suggestions about the best way to play games from GOG on linux.

My current method is that I've got GOG Galaxy installed with bottles, and then I use GOG Galaxy to install and launch the Windows games. That's working alright so far. One downside is that won't install Iinux versions like that, so for games that have a native linux version I have to decide if I want to install it separately, or just run the windows version with the others. So that isn't perfect. Another minor thing I don't like is that since I'm installing games via GOG Galaxy via Bottles via Flatpak... I end up having very little idea of where stuff is being saved. It's difficult to find save game files for example; and if there is some junk installed or left over from something, there's very little chance that I'm going to notice and delete it. It just feels very opaque. (I guess that's mostly just about my personal lack of knowledge though.)

Anyway, I'm mostly just wondering how others are choosing to handle their games from GOG.

 

I'm vaguely interested in having a few different encrypted folders on my computer, with different passwords on each. I don't have any particular strong requirements. It's more of a velleity; mostly just to try it so that I know more about it.

That said, when I search for encryption options, I see a lot of different advice from different times. I'm seeings stuff about EncFS, eCryptFS, CryFS; and others... and I find it a bit confusing because to me all those names look basically the same; and it's not easy for me to tell whether or not the info I'm reading is out of date.

So figure I'd just ask here for recommendations. The way I imagine it, I want some encrypted data on my computer with as little indication of what it is as possible; and but with a command and a password I can then access it like a normal drive or folder; copying stuff in or out, or editing things. And when I'm done, I unmount it (or whatever) and now its inaccessible and opaque again.

I'm under the impression that there are a bunch of different tools that will do what I've got in mind. But I'm interested in recommendations (since most of the recommendations I've seen on the internet seem to be from years ago, and for maybe slightly different use-cases).

view more: next ›