this post was submitted on 21 Feb 2025
43 points (100.0% liked)

Politics

10264 readers
12 users here now

In-depth political discussion from around the world; if it's a political happening, you can post it here.


Guidelines for submissions:

These guidelines will be enforced on a know-it-when-I-see-it basis.


Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

A Republican group is hoping to rally support to change the Constitution to allow President Donald Trump to seek a third term.

The 22nd Amendment to the Constitution was ratified in 1951 following the presidency of Franklin D. Roosevelt, who was elected to four terms between 1933 and 1945. The two-term limit for presidents was introduced by Congress to prevent potential abuses of power.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 8 points 1 week ago (4 children)

TIL Australia is not a sane democracy.

[–] alansuspect@aussie.zone 4 points 1 week ago

The difference is countries that vote for parties vs voting for an individual. I don't know why anyone would think one person would have the best interests of the country at heart.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 3 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Nor Canada.

Does any commonwealth country have that sort of term limits?

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Not that I'm aware of? Technically the king/queen is head of state and that term is until death, can't get much longer than that.

[–] kent_eh@lemmy.ca 1 points 1 week ago

Technically the king/queen is head of state

Technically, yes, but I was referring to the elected president/prime minister who is the head of the functional (as opposed to ceremonial) government.

[–] Gorgritch_umie_killa@aussie.zone 2 points 1 week ago (1 children)

Sanity doesn't create our system,

If the PM survives the voters, their Party dances them out, if the PM survives the Party, the PM resigns to spend more time with "family", if the PM survives the "family", the GG.... Kerrtails.

The PMs power at any given time can seem a bit Schroedinger's cat.

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago

It probably depends how much fractional power and money is behind the PM. John Howard was PM for a decade after all.

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@spiffmeister hah! Are you able to be president for more than 2 consecutive terms in peace time?

(I heard France doesn't prohibit more than two terms either, but they have to not be consecutive)

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 1 points 1 week ago (2 children)

Well Australia doesn't have a president. But in theory there's nothing stopping someone from being prime minister for infinite time, provided their party doesn't stab them in the back or their party doesn't lose the election.

Is Sue Lines, the President of the Senate, a joke to you! For interest, they also have no set term limits.

[–] petrescatraian@libranet.de 1 points 1 week ago (1 children)

@spiffmeister oh, I see. Well, technically, a prime-minister is a different thing, so you're right in this regard, but yeah, practically no one has been a prime minister for very long. It's a bit of a complicated thing

[–] spiffmeister@aussie.zone 3 points 1 week ago

Agreed that PM is different, they don't weild the same power the US president does. But in terms of time, Robert Menzies was pm for a total of 18 years and John Howard was pm for 12, so you can be for a long time. Politics have just been much less stable in the last 20 years.