this post was submitted on 09 Sep 2024
609 points (100.0% liked)

Science Memes

243 readers
32 users here now

Welcome to c/science_memes @ Mander.xyz!

A place for majestic STEMLORD peacocking, as well as memes about the realities of working in a lab.



Rules

  1. Don't throw mud. Behave like an intellectual and remember the human.
  2. Keep it rooted (on topic).
  3. No spam.
  4. Infographics welcome, get schooled.

This is a science community. We use the Dawkins definition of meme.



Research Committee

Other Mander Communities

Science and Research

Biology and Life Sciences

Physical Sciences

Humanities and Social Sciences

Practical and Applied Sciences

Memes

Miscellaneous

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 7 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (5 children)

But really it is much better for human temperatures.

It's just intuitive, 0F is 100% cold, and 100F is 100% hot.

When the dry bulb gets above 100F, wind only cools you down by sweat evaporation, and when the wet bulb gets above 100F, even that can't cool you down, and you will die if you don't get to a cooler or drier environment.

[–] pumpkinseedoil@mander.xyz 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

I love it when it's -10% hot in winter nights or 110% hot around the equator. Makes perfect sense.

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Yes, it does a better job of impressing that is all of the hot (or cold), and then 10% more than the difference between 38 and 43

[–] flora_explora 7 points 5 months ago

Any of the systems is better if you have an intuitive understanding of it. I don't know what 107 F would feel like, just as you don't know what 42°C feels like. But it's not a thing where one is inherently better than the other...

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 4 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago) (1 children)

Lol, 0F is not 100% cold. That is barely cold unless you live in very warm place like tropic or something

[–] alcoholicorn@lemmy.ml 3 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Do you live in northern canada?

[–] lauha@lemmy.one 2 points 5 months ago
[–] Honytawk@lemmy.zip 3 points 5 months ago

0F is 100% cold, and 100F is 100% hot.

So 50% is perfect temperature, no?

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 3 points 5 months ago (2 children)

How is 0F 100% cold though, most places will never get that cold, so it surely makes more sense to have 0F at freezing point of water and 100F at 38C?

[–] MadBob@feddit.nl 2 points 5 months ago

Not to mention negative numbers.

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Freezing point of pure water - but saltwater/brine freezes as a different temperature.

[–] 1rre@discuss.tchncs.de 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

pure water at mean atmosphere pressure at sea level if we're getting technical, but frankly human body temperature varies from 35.5C (95.9F) to 37.5C (99.5F) anyway, and that's before considering when people are ill, so if we go down that route it falls apart quickly enough that the definition of 100 given above is clearly just as arbitrary

[–] OpenStars@discuss.online 1 points 5 months ago

I'm okay with "mean atmosphere pressure" bc that's what is most likely to occur, whereas pure water seems far less likely to be found in a coastal village. The oddness of the measuring abilities of the devices made at the time is a more damning argument, but less for them back then and more for us now. Still, roughly negative ten to 40 for Celsius vs. roughly zero to one hundred for Fahrenheit, the latter does seem to use more "natural" numbers, even if nothing else about non-metric systems makes any sense.

[–] suzune@ani.social 1 points 5 months ago

Is 50°F 50% cold or 50% hot?