this post was submitted on 27 Jul 2024
127 points (100.0% liked)

Pleasant Politics

5 readers
11 users here now

Politics without the jerks.

This community is watched over by a ruthless robot moderator to keep out bad actors. I don't know if it will work. Read !santabot@slrpnk.net for a full explanation. The short version is don't be a net negative to the community and you can post here.

Rules

Post political news, your own opinions, or discussion. Anything goes.

All posts must follow the slrpnk sitewide rules.

No personal attacks, no bigotry, no spam. Those will get a manual temporary ban.

founded 4 months ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] solo@slrpnk.net 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago) (1 children)

Can DEMOCRATS please TONE DOWN their Violent Rhetoric!

It seems to me you are confusing things, on who has the violent rhetoric.

This comes from the very beginning of the article:

“I’m afraid if we lose this one, it’s going to take a civil war to save the country — and it will be saved,” Lang said Monday.

And the text that follows is full of more examples, the following are just a couple of those

“If Stephen Richer walked in this room, I would lynch him,”

“some folks need killing!"

These stuff do not come from dems, so you might want to reconsider what you said

[–] The_Che_Banana 6 points 3 months ago (2 children)

Imma gonna go out on a limb and say they were being sarcastic.

(if not...lo fuckingl)

[–] AVincentInSpace@pawb.social 2 points 3 months ago (1 children)

did you just insert a swearword into the middle of the word "lol"

[–] The_Che_Banana 2 points 3 months ago

Laugh out fucking loud.

....sooo yes.

[–] GammaGames 2 points 3 months ago* (last edited 3 months ago)

It’s pretty obvious sarcasm to most