Gaming

30563 readers

16 users here now

From video gaming to card games and stuff in between, if it's gaming you can probably discuss it here!

Please Note: Gaming memes are permitted to be posted on Meme Mondays, but will otherwise be removed in an effort to allow other discussions to take place.

See also Gaming's sister community Tabletop Gaming.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

125

Long Dark dev criticises Manor Lords for lack of updates, Hooded Horse CEO replies that not every game needs to be "some live-service boom or bust" (www.rockpapershotgun.com)

submitted 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago) by ConstableJelly to c/gaming

36 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Interesting thoughts about how to define success for video games in today's market, particularly for those using early access. Lots of respect for Hooded Horse's CEO, Tim Bender, he says all the right things and seems genuine.

He describes van Lierop’s post as “exactly the kind of distorted endless growth/burden of expectations/line must go up perspective that causes so much trouble in the games industry”. He’s also unconcerned by Manor Lords falling behind its initial vast popularity, poking fun at “the apparently dark reality that some people, after enjoying their purchase of a premium, single-player title, might decide to go on and play another game (The horror! The horror!).”

Headline is a little melodramatic though.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] t3rmit3 14 points 4 months ago (1 children)

Manor Lords was the top-seller on Steam for a couple days if not a full week, so Hooded Horse definitely has enough money for a good while.

Bender said Manor Lords sold 250,000 copies in the last month after selling over two million copies in its first three weeks MSN

2,250,000 * $30 = $67,500,000

I think they'll be good for a while.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 14 points 4 months ago (2 children)

*70% - don't forget Steam's cut! There's basically nothing left after that.

/s just in case not obvious

[–] AdellcomdoisL 7 points 4 months ago (1 children)

I believe Steam's predatory cut is very important to the discussion and not a light matter at all, although that's a discussion for a different thread.

Those should still a good amount of earnings, even if we aren't aware of how much it goes to HH and how much to Styczeń, so they do have good reason to take it easy.

[–] CraigeryTheKid@lemm.ee 16 points 4 months ago

Not to go down a rabbit hole that's off topic, but I'm generally not offended by Steam's cut. The platform, advertising, centralizing, hosting, and cloud saves, etc etc, seem like a major benefit, especially for smaller developers, that would allow them to get to market faster, and with a much larger audience.

[–] jjagaimo@lemmy.ca 6 points 4 months ago* (last edited 4 months ago)

Which also drops from 30% to 25% after $10M and to 20% after $50M, giving a grand total of:

$10,000,000*0.70+
$40,000,000*0.75+
$17,500,000*0.80=
$51,000,000

Not including taxes and fees