U.S. News

2244 readers

3 users here now

News about and pertaining to the United States and its people.

Please read what's functionally the mission statement before posting for the first time. We have a narrower definition of news than you might be accustomed to.

Guidelines for submissions:

Post the original source of information as the link.
If there is any Nazi imagery in the linked story, mark your post NSFW.
If there is a paywall, provide an archive link in the body.
Post using the original headline; edits for clarity (as in providing crucial info a clickbait hed omits) are fine.
Social media is not a news source.

For World News, see the News community.

This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

alyaza

rs5th

Powderhorn

165

GUILTY (edition.cnn.com)

submitted 5 months ago by UNIX84 to c/usnews

26 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Guilty on 34 counts.

In a historic verdict, Trump was convicted of falsifying business records in connection to a hush money payment to Stormy Daniels.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 9 points 5 months ago (1 children)

If felons can't vote, they also shouldn't be able to run for office.

Fuck 'em up!

[–] Drusas@kbin.run 18 points 5 months ago (2 children)

I understand the sentiment, but it is important for felons to be allowed to run for office. I would also say that the vast majority of them should be allowed to vote as well (I would only take that away in cases which involve acts against democracy, election interference, etc--which, incidentally, this was).

Sometimes the law is wrong. How many people are felons because they smoked pot, for example?

[–] SharkEatingBreakfast@sopuli.xyz 13 points 5 months ago

For the record, I support allowing felons to vote.

But maybe not this one.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

Meh...the felon population is not supposed to be large enough to influence elections...looks up incarcerated numbers...Louisiana/Oklahoma/Mississipi: nearly 1%...ok...new voting group: the incarcerated...but...who wants to fight for that vote?

[–] TwiddleTwaddle@lemmy.blahaj.zone 2 points 5 months ago (1 children)

^ absolute shit take

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

why?

[–] The_Che_Banana 1 points 5 months ago (1 children)

because once you take the right away from a group, somehow laws are written and enforced to make targeted population into that group. Look at drug laws. Oh, you have 2 Marijuana cigarettes? 20 years and no vote for you drug kingpen.

[–] Gsus4@mander.xyz 1 points 5 months ago* (last edited 5 months ago)

Wait, the rates of incarceration in Louisiana are because of pot? Yeah, that's fucked up.